Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links

“News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues”—The news you won't see on W3!

Our Friends:

Watching IBM Watching IBM Facebook

Quick Links:

Get involved! Insider trading After IBM Lenovo Employee Discount

Previous highlights:

April 2, 2016 March 26, 2016 March 12, 2016 March 5, 2016 February 27, 2016 February 20, 2016 February 13, 2016 February 6, 2016 January 30, 2016 January 16, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 19, 2015 December 12, 2015 December 5, 2015 November 28, 2015 November 21, 2015 November 14, 2015 November 7, 2015 October 31, 2015 October 24, 2015 October 17, 2015 October 10, 2015 October 3, 2015 September 26, 2015 September 19, 2015 September 12, 2015 August 29, 2015 August 22, 2015 August 15, 2015 August 8, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 18, 2015 July 4, 2015 June 27, 2015 June 20, 2015 June 13, 2015 June 6, 2015 May 30, 2015 May 23, 2015 May 16, 2015 May 9, 2015 May 2, 2015 April 25, 2015 April 18, 2015 April 11, 2015 April 4, 2015 March 28, 2015 March 21, 2015 March 14, 2015 March 7, 2015 February 28, 2015 February 21, 2015 February 14, 2015 February 7, 2015 January 31, 2015 January 24, 2015 January 17, 2015 January 10, 2015 January 3, 2015 December 27, 2014 December 20, 2014 December 13, 2014 December 6, 2014 November 29, 2014 November 22, 2014 November 15, 2014 November 8, 2014 November 1, 2014 October 25, 2014 October 18, 2014 October 11, 2014 October 4, 2014 September 27, 2014 September 13, 2014 September 6, 2014 August 30, 2014 August 23, 2014 August 16, 2014 August 9, 2014 August 2, 2014 July 26, 2014 July 19, 2014 July 12, 2014 July 5, 2014 June 28, 2014 June 21, 2014 June 14, 2014 June 7, 2014 May 31, 2014 May 24, 2014 May 17, 2014 May 10, 2014 May 3, 2014 April 26, 2014 April 19, 2014 April 12, 2014 April 5, 2014 March 29, 2014 March 22, 2014 March 15, 2014 March 8, 2014 March 1, 2014 February 22, 2014 February 15, 2014 February 8, 2014 February 1, 2014 January 25, 2014 January 18, 2014 January 11, 2014 January 4, 2014 December 28, 2013 December 21, 2013 December 14, 2013 December 7, 2013 November 30, 2013 November 23, 2013 November 16, 2013 November 9, 2013 November 2, 2013 October 26, 2013 October 19, 2013 October 12, 2013 October 5, 2013 September 28, 2013 September 21, 2013 September 14, 2013 September 7, 2013 August 31, 2013 August 24, 2013 August 17, 2013 August 10, 2013 August 3, 2013 July 27, 2013 July 20, 2013 July 13, 2013 July 6, 2013 June 29, 2013 June 22, 2013 June 15, 2013 June 8, 2013 June 1, 2013 May 25, 2013 May 18, 2013 May 11, 2013 May 4, 2013 April 27, 2013 April 20, 2013 April 13, 2013 April 6, 2013 March 30, 2013 March 23, 2013 March 16, 2013 March 9, 2013 March 2, 2013 February 23, 2013 February 16, 2013 February 9, 2013 February 2, 2013 January 26, 2013 January 19, 2013 January 12, 2013 January 5, 2013 December 29, 2012 December 22, 2012 December 15, 2012 December 8, 2012 December 1, 2012 November 24, 2012 November 17, 2012 November 10, 2012 November 3, 2012 October 27, 2012 October 20, 2012 October 13, 2012 October 6, 2012 September 29, 2012 September 22, 2012 September 15, 2012 September 8, 2012 September 1, 2012 August 25, 2012 August 18, 2012 August 11, 2012 August 4, 2012 July 28, 2012 July 21, 2012 July 14, 2012 July 7, 2012 June 30, 2012 June 23, 2012 June 16, 2012 June 9, 2012 June 2, 2012 May 26, 2012 May 19, 2012 May 12, 2012 May 5, 2012 April 28, 2012 April 21, 2012 April 14, 2012 April 7, 2012 March 31, 2012 March 24, 2012 March 17, 2012 March 10, 2012 March 3, 2012 February 25, 2012 February 18, 2012 February 11, 2012 February 4, 2012 January 28, 2012 January 21, 2012 January 14, 2012 January 7, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 24, 2011 December 17, 2011 December 10, 2011 December 3, 2011 November 26, 2011 November 19, 2011 November 12, 2011 November 5, 2011 October 29, 2011 October 22, 2011 October 15, 2011 October 8, 2011 October 1, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 17, 2011 September 10, 2011 September 3, 2011 August 27, 2011 August 20, 2011 August 13, 2011 August 6, 2011 July 30, 2011 July 23, 2011 July 16, 2011 July 9, 2011 July 2, 2011 June 25, 2011 June 18, 2011 June 11, 2011 June 4, 2011 May 28, 2011 May 21, 2011 May 14, 2011 May 7, 2011 April 30, 2011 April 23, 2011 April 16, 2011 April 9, 2011 April 2, 2011 March 26, 2011 March 19, 2011 March 12, 2011 March 5, 2011 February 26, 2011 February 19, 2011 February 12, 2011 February 5, 2011 January 29, 2011 January 22, 2011 January 15, 2011 January 8, 2011 January 1, 2011 December 25, 2010 December 18, 2010 December 11, 2010 December 4, 2010 November 27, 2010 November 20, 2010 November 13, 2010 November 6, 2010 October 30, 2010 October 23, 2010 October 16, 2010 October 9, 2010 October 2, 2010 September 25, 2010 September 18, 2010 September 11, 2010 September 4, 2010 August 28, 2010 August 21, 2010 August 14, 2010 August 7, 2010 July 31, 2010 July 24, 2010 July 17, 2010 July 10, 2010 July 3, 2010 June 26, 2010 June 19, 2010 June 12, 2010 June 5, 2010 May 29, 2010 May 22, 2010 May 15, 2010 May 8, 2010 May 1, 2010 April 24, 2010 April 17, 2010 April 10, 2010 April 3, 2010 March 27, 2010 March 20, 2010 March 13, 2010 March 6, 2010 February 27, 2010 February 20, 2010 February 13, 2010 February 6, 2010 January 30, 2010 January 23, 2010 January 16, 2010 January 9, 2010 January 2, 2010 December 26, 2009 December 19, 2009 December 12, 2009 December 5, 2009 November 28, 2009 November 21, 2009 November 14, 2009 November 7, 2009 October 31, 2009 October 24, 2009 October 17, 2009 October 10, 2009 October 3, 2009 September 26, 2009 September 19, 2009 September 12, 2009 September 5, 2009 August 29, 2009 August 22, 2009 August 15, 2009 August 8, 2009 August 1, 2009 July 25, 2009 July 18, 2009 July 11, 2009 July 4, 2009 June 27, 2009 June 20, 2009 June 13, 2009 June 6, 2009 May 30, 2009 May 23, 2009 May 16, 2009 May 9, 2009 May 2, 2009 April 25, 2009 April 18, 2009 April 11, 2009 April 4, 2009 March 28, 2009 March 21, 2009 March 14, 2009 March 7, 2009 February 28, 2009 February 21, 2009 February 14, 2009 February 7, 2009 January 31, 2009 January 24, 2009 January 17, 2009 January 10, 2009 January 03, 2009 December 27, 2008 December 20, 2008 December 13, 2008 December 6, 2008 November 29, 2008 November 22, 2008 November 15, 2008 November 8, 2008 November 1, 2008 October 25, 2008 October 18, 2008 October 11, 2008 October 4, 2008 September 27, 2008 September 20, 2008 September 13, 2008 September 6, 2008 August 30, 2008 August 23, 2008 August 16, 2008 August 9, 2008 August 2, 2008 July 26, 2008 July 19, 2008 July 12, 2008 July 5, 2008 June 28, 2008 June 21, 2008 June 14, 2008 June 7, 2008 May 31, 2008 May 24, 2008 May 17, 2008 May 10, 2008 2008 Stock Meeting April 26, 2008 April 19, 2008 April 12, 2008 April 5, 2008 March 29, 2008 March 22, 2008 March 15, 2008 March 8, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 16, 2008 February 9, 2008 February 2, 2008 January 26, 2008 January 19, 2008 January 12, 2008 January 5, 2008 December 29, 2007 December 22, 2007 December 15, 2007 December 8, 2007 December 1, 2007 November 24, 2007 November 17, 2007 November 10, 2007 November 3, 2007 October 27, 2007 October 20, 2007 October 13, 2007 October 6, 2007 September 29, 2007 September 22, 2007 September 15, 2007 September 8, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 25, 2007 August 18, 2007 August 11, 2007 August 4, 2007 July 28, 2007 July 21, 2007 July 14, 2007 July 7, 2007 June 30, 2007 June 23, 2007 June 16, 2007 June 9, 2007 June 2, 2007 May 26, 2007 May 19, 2007 May 12, 2007 May 5, 2007 2007 Stock Meeting April 21, 2007 April 14, 2007 April 7, 2007 March 31, 2007 March 24, 2007 March 17, 2007 March 10, 2007 March 3, 2007 February 24, 2007 February 17, 2007 February 10, 2007 February 3, 2007 January 27, 2007 January 20, 2007 January 13, 2007 January 6, 2007 December 30, 2006 December 23, 2006 December 16, 2006 December 9, 2006 December 2, 2006 November 25, 2006 November 18, 2006 November 11, 2006 November 4, 2006 October 28, 2006 October 21, 2006 October 14, 2006 October 7, 2006 September 30, 2006 September 23, 2006 September 16, 2006 September 9, 2006 September 2, 2006 August 26, 2006 August 19, 2006 August 12, 2006 August 5, 2006 July 29, 2006 July 22, 2006 July 15, 2006 July 8, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 24, 2006 June 17, 2006 June 10, 2006 June 3, 2006 May 27, 2006 May 20, 2006 May 13, 2006 May 6, 2006 2006 Stock Meeting April 22, 2006 April 15, 2006 April 8, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 25, 2006 March 18, 2006 March 11, 2006 March 4, 2006 February 25, 2006 February 18, 2006 February 11, 2006 February 4, 2006 January 28, 2006 January 21, 2006 January 14, 2006 January 7, 2006 December 31, 2005 December 24, 2005 December 17, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 03, 2005 November 26, 2005 November 19, 2005 November 12, 2005 November 5, 2005 October 29, 2005 October 22, 2005 October 15, 2005 October 8, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 24, 2005 September 17, 2005 September 10, 2005 September 3, 2005 August 27, 2005 August 20, 2005 August 13, 2005 August 6, 2005 July 30, 2005 July 23, 2005 July 16, 2005 July 9, 2005 July 2, 2005 June 25, 2005 June 18, 2005 June 11, 2005 June 4, 2005 May 28, 2005 May 21, 2005 May 14, 2005 May 7, 2005 April 30, 2005 April 23, 2005 April 16, 2005 April 9, 2005 April 2, 2005 March 26, 2005 March 19, 2005 March 12, 2005 March 5, 2005 February 26, 2005 February 19, 2005 February 12, 2005 February 5, 2005 January 29, 2005 January 22, 2005 January 15, 2005 January 8, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 25, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 11, 2004 December 4, 2004 November 27, 2004 November 20, 2004 November 13, 2004 November 6, 2004 October 30, 2004 October 23, 2004 October 16, 2004 October 9, 2004 October 2, 2004 September 25, 2004 September 18, 2004 September 11, 2004 September 4, 2004 August 28, 2004 August 21, 2004 August 14, 2004 August 7, 2004 July 31, 2004 July 24, 2004 July 17, 2004 July 10, 2004 July 3, 2004 June 26, 2004 June 19, 2004 June 5, 2004 May 29, 2004 May 22, 2004 May 15, 2004 May 8, 2004 2004 Stock Meeting April 24, 2004 April 10, 2004 April 3, 2004 March 27, 2004 March 20, 2004 March 13, 2004 March 6, 2004 February 28, 2004 February 21, 2004 February 14, 2004 February 7, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 18, 2004 December 27, 2003 December 20, 2003 December 13, 2003 December 6, 2003 November 29, 2003 November 22, 2003 November 15, 2003 November 8, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 25, 2003 October 18, 2003 October 11, 2003 October 4, 2003 September 27, 2003 September 20, 2003 September 13, 2003 September 6, 2003 August 30, 2003 August 23, 2003 August 16, 2003 August 9, 2003 Pension Lawsuit Win July 26, 2003 July 19, 2003 July 12, 2003 July 5, 2003 June 28, 2003 June 21, 2003 June 14, 2003 June 7, 2003 May 31, 2003 May 24, 2003 May 17, 2003 May 10, 2003 2003 Stock Meeting April 26, 2003 April 19, 2003 April 12, 2003 April 5, 2003 March 29, 2003 March 22, 2003 March 15, 2003 March 8, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 22, 2003 February 15, 2003 February 8, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 25, 2003 January 18, 2003 January 11, 2003 January 4, 2003 December 28, 2002 December 21, 2002 December 14, 2002 December 7, 2002 November 30, 2002 November 23, 2002 November 16, 2002 November 9, 2002 November 2, 2002 October 26, 2002 October 19, 2002 October 12, 2002 October 5, 2002 September 28, 2002 September 21, 2002 September 14, 2002 September 7, 2002 August 31, 2002 August 24, 2002 August 17, 2002 August 10, 2002 August 3, 2002 July 27, 2002 July 20, 2002 July 13, 2002 July 6, 2002 June 29, 2002 June 22, 2002 June 15, 2002 June 8, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 25, 2002 May 18, 2002 May 11, 2002 2002 Stock Meeting April 27, 2002 April 20, 2002 April 13, 2002 April 6, 2002 March 30, 2002 March 23, 2002 March 16, 2002 March 9, 2002 March 2, 2002 February 23, 2002 February 16, 2002 February 9, 2002 February 2, 2002 January 26, 2002 January 19, 2002 January 12, 2002 January 5, 2002 December 29, 2001 December 22, 2001 December 15, 2001 December 8, 2001 December 1, 2001 November 24, 2001 November 17, 2001 November 10, 2001 November 3, 2001 October 27, 2001 October 20, 2001 October 13, 2001 October 6, 2001 September 29, 2001 September 22, 2001 September 15, 2001 September 8, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 25, 2001 August 18, 2001 August 11, 2001 August 4, 2001 July 28, 2001 July 21, 2001 July 14, 2001 July 7, 2001 June 30, 2001 June 23, 2001 June 16, 2001 June 9, 2001 June 2, 2001 May 26, 2001 May 19, 2001 May 12, 2001 May 5, 2001 2001 Stock Meeting April 21, 2001 April 14, 2001 April 7, 2001 March 31, 2001 March 24, 2001 March 17, 2001 March 10, 2001 March 3, 2001 February 24, 2001 February 17, 2001 February 10, 2001 February 3, 2001 January 27, 2001 January 20, 2001 January 13, 2001 January 6, 2001 December 30, 2000 December 23, 2000 December 16, 2000 December 9, 2000 December 2, 2000 November 24, 2000 November 17, 2000 November 10, 2000 November 4, 2000 October 28, 2000 October 21, 2000 October 14, 2000 October 7, 2000 September 30, 2000 September 23, 2000 September 16, 2000 September 9, 2000 September 2, 2000 August 26, 2000 August 19, 2000 August 12, 2000 July 29, 2000 July 22, 2000 July 15, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 24, 2000 June 17, 2000 June 10, 2000 June 3, 2000 May 27, 2000 May 20, 2000 May 13, 2000 May 6, 2000 April, 2000

Highlights—March 7, 2015

  • The Register (United Kingdom):

    High Court: IBM staff refused pay increases can claim damages. Big Blue set to appeal. By Kat Hall. Excerpts: IBM employees who were refused salary increases because they would not agree to changes to the company's pension scheme are entitled to claim damages, the High Court has ruled.

    The judgment set out the remedies available to employees in relation to "Project Waltz". The project was implemented in 2009 to help the company meet its 2010 target for earnings per share (EPS) and cut costs and led to a quarter of UK staff being kicked off its final-salary pension scheme.

    It follows a ruling last year that IBM breached its duties by giving staff the choice of either signing the non-pensionability agreements or receiving no pay increases in the future.

    High Court judge Mr Justice Warren said staff are entitled to claim damages from IBM to reflect the salary they would have received had IBM not implemented Project Waltz. ...

    IBM said it "respectfully, but fundamentally, disagrees with the Court's decision".

    A spokesman said: "The Court has acknowledged IBM's right to make changes in its UK pension programmes, which encompasses IBM’s need to make changes in the fast-changing technology world. We believe the Court applied an incorrect legal standard in restricting IBM's exercise of that right. IBM plans to seek leave to appeal this ruling."

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • I Am Not A Lawyer, but... Nice to have it confirmed that earnings per share targets don't trump employment law. Here. Yet.
    • Waaaaah!!!! Judge won't play ball :-( "The Court has acknowledged IBM's right to make changes in its UK pension programmes, which encompasses IBM’s need to screw a proportion of the hard working and talented employees that allow us to compete in the fast-changing technology world, and thereby pay our U.S. execs their obscene salaries."
    • From somewhere else: In IBM UK Ltd's 2013 audited accounts: £196m of IBM's UK income of £357m came from actuarial gains from the Defined Benefit Pension schemes. Nuff said.
  • Poughkeepsie Journal:

    IBM global headcount drops sharply in 2014. By Craig Wolf. Excerpts: IBM Corp. reports that its global workforce dropped by more than 51,000 in 2014, a decline of 12 percent.

    They don't say how much of a cut they did in the United States, but the head of a national workers advocacy group says more than 1,600 regular IBMers lost their jobs in a recent downsizing.

    IBM's global report comes as an exhibit in a required annual filing, called a 10-K, done with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In it, the company says that "for the year ended 2014" it had 379,592 employees, a substantial drop and a much greater one than in 2013.

    About 38,000 "resources," as the company calls its employees, were gone due to divestitures of the business units in which they worked, the report said.

    IBM used to break out how many people worked for the company within its home country, but it stopped giving U.S. numbers in 2010. It also has stopped giving local site headcount reports except when required by some law or often, terms of a tax-break deal.

    Lee Conrad, national organizer for the workers' group, Alliance@IBM, said he has learned there were 75,622 regular IBMers on Tuesday, down by 1,686 from mid-February. IBM has not confirmed nor commented on that number. But the company has said that a "workforce rebalancing" this year would amount to several thousand jobs.

    "The latest IBM employee number that the Alliance has received clearly shows that IBM is continuing to decrease its US employee population regardless of all the public relations talk of so called 'hiring,'" Conrad said. "For years IBM management has tried to hide the fact that they have been abandoning the U.S. workforce. We know and the IBM employees know what is going on and it is shameful."

  • Handelsblatt Online (Germany):

    IBM streicht etwa 400 Stellen in Deutschland. German to English translation shown here is courtesy of Google Translate. IBM deletes approximately 400 jobs in Germany. Translated excerpts: IBM deletes according to a magazine as part of its worldwide release program this year about 400 jobs in Germany. Employees should sign termination agreements, reports the "Business Week", citing circles of IBM -Aufsichtsrates. Thus, the number of employees of the world's largest IT service provider would drop to about 16,500 in Germany. IBM Germany refused to comment on the information.
  • Computerworld Denmark:

    Fyringsrunde i IBM Danmark: Medarbejdere mister jobbet onsdag. Danish to English translation shown here is courtesy of Google Translate. Firing Round in IBM Denmark: Employees lose job Wednesday IBM Denmark to go through another round of layoffs, learns Computerworld. By Kim Stensdal. Translated excerpts: Wednesday will be a sad day in IBM Denmark to implement a new round of layoffs. Computerworld learns from a reader that firing the round will take place on Wednesday, and there are rumors that it comes up to 120 employees.

    IBM Denmark rejects the figures but the company can confirm that it has been announced internally that should happen redundancies - and that it is also announced, where in the organization, redundancies are to take place. IBM Denmark does not want to say more at this time and therefore does not know how many employees, it is all about.

    1,000 fewer employees IBM Denmark has already said goodbye to quite a number of employees in recent years. Alone from the 2010 to the 2013 financial statements, the number of employees by more than 1,000, from 3,870 employees to 2,836. ...

    Computerworld has previously interviewed Lars Mikkelgaard-Jensen on the dramatic decline in the number of employees in IBM Denmark. "It's a continuous process that reflects the development we are in." "In some areas it is a demand and a desire from our customers that they want it at a more competitive price than if you produce in Denmark." "That is to say that if you look at the number of FTEs that are being produced for IBM Denmark, it's bigger than ever. It just gets produced in India and elsewhere." "This is our local workforce in some areas down also to the extent that we move the business over to some of the new growth areas," he explained , among other Computerworld last fall.

  • The Register:

    IBM buys 'deep learning' upstart Alchemy API, inhales 40,000 devs. Soz ex-staffers, we want people who can smarten up Watson-as-a-cloud. By Kat Hall. Excerpts: Big Blue has taken a break from its busy axe wielding cost-cutting schedule to buy startup AlchemyAPI and insert 40,000 developers into its "community".

    Deep learning upstart Alchemy API collects, sifts through and analyses unstructured text and data. According to Big Blue, the acquisition will boost IBM's "Watson ecosystem".

    The sale is part of IBM's move to rejig its traditional hardware and software biz after posting 11 consecutive quarters of declining sales.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • Steamroller our culture over yours. Heh, yeah, you know that free wheelin', free thinkin' start-up type culture we said we liked so much? Well its going to get corporately f---ed. After about a year spraying you with our big blue treacle*, you'll kick yourself for thinking you were going to be the special different one who could avoid being borged. Welcome to our anti-culture.

      * apologies for unfortunately imagery, but see also: XIV, Fiberlink, Ascential...

    • It's all about impressing the Stock Market. This has nothing to do with real business. IBMs management bonuses are related to the share price.

      So anything that impresses the traders in the banks and insurance companies is fair game. Firing employees, mouthing out meaningless BS about the latest big thing, mergers and acquisitions all impress our financial overlords.

      There doesn't need to be any logic behind these "growth strategies" as you are only trying to impress the people who thought sub-prime mortgages were a really good idea. Remember these are the people who brought you Wall Street Crash and its many sequels.

  • The Register:

    IBM's secret growth plan is … Karaoke? ♫ I guess that's why they call it Big Blue ♫ By Simon Sharwood. Excerpts: IBM might be planning a karaoke-led-resurgence, if a new patent application titled “Enhancing karaoke systems utilizing audience sentiment feedback and audio watermarking” is any guide.

    If IBM had a theme song it would probably be “I guess that's why they call it the blues”, as the company is beset by problems: the cloud challenges the company's already-dwindling hardware business, its SoftLayer cloud trails rivals Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google. Outsourcing isn't as popular as it once was which means the company's consulting business is no longer thriving. It's even paying others to take loss-making business units of its hands.

    One of Big Blue's strategies is a new album of products with an analytical beat. This patent could be a b-side in that effort, as it appears to add the chance for crowdsourced social feedback for Karaoke. ,,,

    The application, filed with the US Patent Office, is written in densest patentese, but the gist of it seems to be that singers will appreciate real-time feedback and the ability to share performances across their social networks, but that rights-holders will also like the ability to associate a performance with the original work, with biometric watermarking of their performances and analysis available to the owner of a song.

    IBM holds or has a hand in thousands of patents, including this one for a mosquito trap. So it's not entirely unusual for Big Blue to have waft at something a little odd.

  • The Channel:

    IBM may swing axe on same departments more than once. Job security in tech? Maybe try another industry. By Paul Kunert. Excerpts: Such is the lack of job security at IBM that staff in certain departments could be at risk of redundancy on more than one occasion during this year, The Channel can reveal.

    An elected Employee Consultation Committee (ECC) is liaising between IBMers in Systems Middleware that are working in Platform, Integration and Smarter Process units, amid a voluntary redundancy process.

    Around ten per cent of the division, which employs 736 staff locally, can ask to leave with a cheque. The notice period is one week per a year’s service, ranging from a minimum of four weeks to a maximum of 12. ...

    “If there is insufficient uptake via the voluntary programme, we may have to consider moving to an involuntary programme," said IBM.

    Asked if further lay-offs are expected later in the year as well, IBM responded “the business reacts to results and as such no comment can be made on this as no-one actually knows”.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • Why the hell would anyone want to go back? Or go there in the first place for that matter. IBM once had a good reputation and was a good company to have on your CV. Not any more.

      Wish they'd hurry up and announce more packages in my area. My name will be down again in a flash, like it was last time. Still, they're paying me to piss around on the internet all day despite me offering to leave so it's not all bad.

    • 0.05% bonus! Last year I achieved *all* of my objectives, and I actually exceeded my utilization target (84%) by 10 percentage points.

      Last year Ginny Rometty failed miserably to achieve her sole strategic goal -pathetic as that was- of an EPS of $15 (what vision!)

      She received millions in bonuses and I received less than 2 grand, or about 0.05% of our failure of a Chairman's.

      It's well past time to sack her and her worthless board.

  • The Register:

    IBM sued for talking up semiconductor business it couldn't give away. Firm alleges investors didn't realize Big Blue would need to PAY to have its chips hauled off. By Neil McAllister. Excerpts: A US public pension fund has filed a class-action lawsuit against IBM, claiming the company misrepresented the value of the semiconductor business it offloaded to GlobalFoundries in October.

    The suit filed by the City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System in Michigan accuses IBM of having inflated its own share price by valuing its chip manufacturing business at US$2.4bn, when it was actually worth substantially less.

    To be precise, it turned out to be worth substantially less than nothing.

    GlobalFoundries eventually took the business unit off IBM's hands, but only after IBM agreed to pay GlobalFoundries $1.5bn to help prop up operations while it tried to get the loss-making business back on track. At the same time, IBM wrote off a $4.7bn charge for the transfer. ...

    According to a report by Reuters, the Sterling Heights pension plan, which holds shares in IBM, is seeking class-action status on behalf of every investor who held the company's stock between April 17 and October 17, 2014.

    In addition to IBM itself, the company's CEO Ginni Rometty, CFO Martin Schroeter, and controller James Kavanaugh are reportedly also named as defendants

  • The Motley Fool:

    3 Reasons International Business Machines Corp. Stock Could Fall. By Leo Sun. Excerpts: Shares of IBM have fallen 13% over the past 12 months, woefully underperforming a 14% gain for the S&P 500. Revenue has declined for 11 consecutive quarters as it struggles to dump lower-margin businesses and transition to more profitable segments.

    Despite some glimmers of hope in cloud-related businesses, IBM could sink even further in 2015. Let's look at the top three reasons investors should beware of Big Blue.

    1. Nonexistent growth. The main problem is a lack of top and bottom-line growth. Last quarter, revenue from continuing operations plunged 12% year-over-year as adjusted net income fell 11%. For the full year, revenue from continuing operations fell 6% to $92.8 billion with adjusted net income slipping 7% to $15.8 billion. ...
    2. IBM earnings game. Another fundamental problem is the way IBM inflated its earnings over the past few years. In 2010, then-CEO Sam Palmisano promised to double annual earnings per share from $10.01 to $20 by 2015. But to accomplish that, he accelerated stock buybacks and divested lower-margin businesses, a strategy that continued even after Ginni Rometty succeeded him in 2012. ...
    3. All-in bet on the cloud. IBM believes expanding its higher-margin cloud businesses will offset its continuing year-over-year revenue declines. ...

    The verdict. Contrarian investors might consider IBM to be a good, beaten up, blue chip stock that could recover over the next few years. However, the company needs to patch up some big holes in its hull before it can sail properly again.

  • Glassdoor IBM reviews. Selected reviews follow:
    • “Used to be a great place to work. Not any more.”

      Current Employee — Senior IT Architect in New York, NY I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: There is some opportunity to work from home.

      Cons: The company was founded on a culture of "Respect for the individual". That is all gone. People are viewed, and described as resources. With constant layoffs, minimal raises, and few promotions morale is at an all time low. Most live in fear they are next for the layoff ax. If you are looking for a place to work, look somewhere else.

      Advice to Senior Management: Start treating your employees like you actually care about them. They are your biggest asset. Across the board I see employees being yelled at and insulted by senior management. The culture has become management by fear. Fix the corrupt appraisal system. It's a scandal how it is used and abused. Bring respect back to the IBM culture.

    • “A Culture of Fear”

      Current Employee — Anonymous Employee in London, England (UK).

      Pros: My part of the IBM organisation have team of dedicated professionals and executives providing a good service to our customer.

      Cons: I joined IBM in the culture of "Respect for the individual", and was the best company to work for. IBM now lacks integrity with management who don’t make decisions and are scared to make decisions. It's now a culture run by fear. The PBC process is broken corrupt and abused by management. The last 3 year have been bad, since Rometty became CEO.

      Advice to Senior Management: Dump Rometty now before it's to late. Stop controlling everything from the top, allow decision making for lower management. Bring back "Respect for the individual".

    • “Promises broken, dreams shattered”

      Former Contractor — Anonymous Contractor in Tulsa, OK. I worked at IBM as a contractor (more than 8 years).

      Pros: Telecommuting used to be a perk, but with forced, unfunded relocations to sites IBM apparently intends to keep open only a short time, there really are no pros.

      Cons: Everything. I was promised direct hire but it never materialized. They cut my pay.

      Advice to Senior Management: Stop shedding Western talent for short-term profits. IBM may already be lost, but if it isn't, you may still have a chance to recover. Rehire those in the West, eliminate the PBC system, eliminate incentives for management based on short-term profit, restore telecommuting, eliminate the GDFs, stop punishing employees for doing what management tells them to do.

    • “At BIG BLUE...You're just a number!”

      Former Employee — Transition Project Manager in Endicott, NY.

      Pros: Many employees, including me, are able to work from home. This is a huge benefit - saving on gas, commute time, enables work-life balance (to some extent). Good benefits and looks good on resume to have worked for this technology giant.

      Cons: I worked for IBM for 10 years and recently let go due to a massive 'reorg' effort. Which really translates into...IBM needs to meet the quarterly budget forecast.

      Working from home for IBM really means: "You will work 24x7!"

      You are basically expected to be 'on call' and join any conference call that's required to troubleshoot and/or support problem resolution every day, and any hour of the day. During major project deployments, holidays are ignored and vacations must be rescheduled or postponed when project schedules change. You don't get paid any 'extra' or over-time for the 24x7 obligation.

      I joined the company through an outsource from previous employer, and my pay stayed the same during the transfer, even though my actual NEW position did not match the same skill set.

      There have been NO pay raises in the past 6 years, and bonuses are nonexistent at the Project Management level.

      When a project ends, you don't have any say in your assignment - whether or not you are good match for the project background. They just move people around without regard to matching performance and skills to the particular position.

      Management is totally disconnected from understanding individual performance, achievements and career counseling. Management is so severely disconnected from actual employee performance, I'm not even sure it's recoverable. It would take a significant amount of focus and resources to make improvements in the area of Human Resources.

      They have layoffs every year and you never know when your number is up. The basis for layoff is a checklist,. Employees who have poor skills, or no skills are retained because they have a required certification — PMI for example. They do this so they can tell clients: "All of our PMs are PMI certified." Yet, they will NOT pay for ANY external training to advance employee skills!

      Advice to Senior Management: This is futile, but IBM needs to recognize and appreciate individual employee contributions and loyalty. They need to invest in employees and build their skills. Without a solid, committed employee foundation, what do you really have?

    • “Company has gone downhill”

      Former Employee — Senior Software Engineer in Raleigh, NC. Pros: Work from home and great co-workers. Cons: No raises, constant pressure, poor leadership. Advice to Senior Management: Keep your good employees instead of laying people off every year; reward employees with raises and bonuses; train your management team to motivate and respect employees.
    • “Working here has been great”

      Current Employee — Software Engineer in Raleigh, NC. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than a year). Pros: Competitive pay, straight-forward work environment. Cons: Lack of perks, company morale is terrible, slow career growth. Advice to Senior Management: Have a better connection with your workers.
    • “Used to be a company with great benefits, career growth and a culture of trust but no more.”

      Current Employee — Second Line Manager in Fort Worth, TX.

      Pros: Opportunity to work in many different job roles; working from home and flexibility.

      Cons: Lack of awards, health benefits have been reduced significantly, lack of trust and vision; too many layers of management who do not make decisions but are highly paid and rewarded.

      Advice to Senior Management: Remove the multiple layers of management and focus on spending your hiring dollars on key roles that will help you realize your vision in Cloud, Analytics, Mobile, Security. You have highly paid executives not making decisions but rather adding layers and layers of processes. You want to "get simple" but you can't even make the simplest of strides in this area due to your management structure.

    • “Horrible. They don't care for their employees at all.”

      Current Employee — Advisory Project Manager. Pros: Work at home. Good vacation. Cons: Layoffs every year for the last seven years. Advice to Senior Management: Value your employees and show it.
    • “Not even close to the company that it once was”

      Current Employee — Software Engineer in Austin, TX. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: In some cases, the pay may be higher than other companies. There are a lot of great people to work with who have been duped by IBMs past reputation.

      Cons: You won't be rewarded for your work. Advancement is very political. The company is rudderless. Pay and bonuses have decreased each year for employees while executives take home more.

      Advice to Senior Management: Walk the walk not just talk the talk. The board needs to bring in executives that are competent in running a large company in order to turn the company around. The appraisal system needs scrapped and the original basic beliefs need reinstated.

    • “It's worse than you think...”

      Current Employee — Sales Representative in New York, NY. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 3 years). Pros: Pays reasonably well. Good work/life balance. Cons: Too big to succeed. Finance driven organization. Looking from the inside it's no surprise why the company is performing so poorly. Constant change. Teams bumping into each other. No clear direction. Blogs, blogs, blogs. The most process-bound organization I have ever been a part of. Advice to Senior Management: Bring in some real sales leadership. Get serious about cloud and stop just paying lip service to it.
    • “Working here was pleasant with no thanks to the superiors.”

      Former Contractor — Systems Engineer. I worked at IBM as a contractor (more than a year).

      Pros: It's a great stepping stone for fresh grads. Great eye opener because you get to travel a lot as an engineer. The office environment is clean and tidy. Good air ventilation.

      Cons: Being on 24-hour standby can be challenging especially if you have a family. Escalation routes are rather strict, but in certain cases it is pretty acceptable.

      Advice to Senior Management: Assess the managers and leaders of teams well, as not all of them are really doing exactly what they ought to do.

    • “Once Great Institution, Titanic Momentum”

      Former Employee — Unix, Cloud in New York, NY.

      Pros: Big. Many customers who still think "No one got fired for buying IBM" (That is changing) are still providing forward motion, but with quickly decelerating momentum.

      Cons: Big, too late to too many things. Slow moving, top-down oriented model, with seeming seriously lacking leadership at numerous levels. Atmosphere of fear, and back stabbing of long-time high achievers. Killing their best by finger pointing, and blaming everyone but high level leadership.

      Advice to Senior Management: It's too late. Appears to be a company on a death spiral. The Titanic was supposed to be unsinkable too, but it appears one of the greats is going down, and quicker than you'd want to believe. Jump off while there is still time.

    • “Test Engineer”

      Current Employee — Software Test Engineer.

      Pros:

      • Good/life balance.
      • Ability to work at home and flexible working hours. Interesting work and great people.
      • Some great products.

      Cons:

      • Managers will not make decisions.
      • Very poor pay and bonuses.
      • PBC process is painful.
      • Promotions are difficult especially if your face doesn't fit.
      • Bureaucratic to the nth degree.
      • No training budget at all.

      Advice to Senior Management: Abolish the PBC appraisal system. Focus on staff morale.

    • “Leadership needs a reboot”

      Current Employee — Product Manager in Raleigh, NC.

      Pros: Flexible work schedules. Opportunity to change positions every 2-3 years if you speak up. Interesting products. Going through a transformation, which can be interesting to be a part of.

      Cons: Very siloed with product lines not working well together on joint development; senior leadership is too in-bred (to lead the cloud initiative, Ginni passed over the CEO of Softlayer, who actually knew about cloud, and put a long-time IBMer in charge who had no experience with cloud); way too process oriented, not nimble like most younger tech companies; doesn't use some of their own best tools very widely, and conversely uses too many of their own worst tools, so the business cannot be managed effectively.

      Advice to Senior Management: Bring in outsiders to lead key initiatives, especially the leaders of the companies you acquire since they actually know those areas. Start using the good IBM tools and good outside tools to manage the business instead of insisting on old home-grown technologies. Cut down on all the red tape and start acting nimble like almost every successful tech company.

    • “Great potential but too many blind spots”

      Current Employee — Anonymous Employee in London, England (UK).

      Pros: So many to choose from. Ambition and confidence — the Smarter Planet story is a great example. IBM can improve the world, knows it and believes it. Who else could have created Watson? All those Nobel prizes, and its simple scale and breadth of capability.

      Cons: Despite all the rhetoric and PR, has still not managed to compete the transformation from product provider to service provider — will not do so until it starts treating its people as human beings rather than stock. (The way the UK pension changes were introduced is a perfect example). Still governed from the very top by a culture of bullying and no trust. May have a female CEO but no real diversity. Financial controls which were suited to surviving a recession but constrain growth. Bonus schemes which no one understands.

      Advice to Senior Management: Challenge the bullying which is reinforced by current management processes. Show employees some respect — stop fighting us over the pension issue — accept the court's decision and settle.

    • “Company changing and not for the better

      ” Former Employee — Anonymous Employee. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros:

      • Work from home to avoid long commute
      • Flexible hours
      • Creative freedom.

      Cons:

      • Working from home without meeting any of the people I worked with in person
      • Annual layoffs; even top performers being replaced with inexperienced off-shore labor
      • Lack of raises and awards
      • Pressured to work more than 55 hours a week, even when not busy
      • Lack of support with loss of experienced work force.

      Advice to Senior Management: Stop replacing experienced top performers with inexperienced cheap off-shore labor. When it takes two weeks and many meetings to resolve a problem which took two hours with one call in the past, you know there is a negative effect to such decisions. It is a matter of balance. Supplementing with off-shore labor may have its benefits.

    • “Great talent that is not valued by management. Meanwhile Financial Engineering company that treats employees as resource”.

      Current Employee — QA Lead in Stuttgart (Germany). I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Still good number of bright colleagues. If you don't care about good compensation, you can define what you do to an considerable extend.

      Cons:

      • No matter how hard you work, you are treated as a resource, a cost-factor.
      • Message is clear: We want the work to be done as cheap as possible.
      • They hire young talent and fire them, once they become more expensive.
      • The consequences are dramatic, IBM continuously bleeds good skill and looses talent and motivation.
      • Management does not understand that there are assets they destroy over long time now, which do not show up on the balance sheet — at least not immediately.

      Advice to Senior Management: Make room for leaders with visions that go beyond key financial metrics. Leaders that understand that companies like IBM need *motivated*, *high skilled employees to deliver more than the ordinary.

    • “IBM — Modern day Titanic. Bound to sink one day.”

      Current Employee — Anonymous Employee. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 5 years).

      Pros: Very few — There are still some bright technical folks working who carry the bulk of workload.

      Cons: Leadership style, if self preserving, almost dictatorial. Upper management rank is filled with sycophants, who just do not care about people who get the job done. Company makes billions of dollars of profits but does not believe in sharing it with employees — very poor yearly raise, hardly any bonus, and forget training. Management will work you to death so where is the time to acquire new training and skills!

      Advice to Senior Management: None. Management is deaf to feedback.

    • “Depends on where you are in the company”

      Current Employee — Anonymous Employee. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 5 years).

      Pros: At IBM it very much depends on where you are in the company. The life of someone in Research is very different from Software Group or Global Business Services. If you're working in a hot area like IBM Cloud or IBM Watson Group, it's a terrific place to work, filled with some of the brightest and hardest working people in the world. As an added bonus, IBM is really good about work life balance and being flexible when life happens.

      Cons: There's a relentless drive toward shareholder value that is hurting the morale of the company as it leads to short horizon decision making. In many areas of the company morale is very low because the employees are working in an area that is no longer the high margin areas that IBM gravitates toward. But where it's good, it's good.

      Advice to Senior Management: There is a profound lack of transparency across the company. Particularly around things like resource actions (layoffs). These are often not communicated with employees, so when a pundit comes out and says "IBM is going to lay off 100k people" we have no way to combat that. In a world of social media your employees can be your best weapon against some of this, but we constantly feel as though there is no communication to those of us manning the decks of the company.

    • “Huge Company Experience”

      Current Employee — Project Manager in Columbia, MO. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 3 years). Pros: Global company, tools to collaborate globally, education/training culture, diverse, work from home ability, vacation days initially starts with 4 weeks. Cons: Mass layoffs not due to merits, impossible to obtain bonuses yearly, unskilled management, benefits are very basic. Advice to Senior Management: Training workshops for managers should be mandatory. Employees should be treated as individuals and not as serial numbers. Improvements needed immediately to retain employees.
    • “The Best Place I've Worked”

      Current Employee — Senior Software Engineer in Cambridge, MA. Pros: Unbelievable accomplishments, history, and incredible vision for the future. Their is a reason Buffet had IBM as the 3rd most invested company by Berkshire-Hathaway. They have gone through 3/4 transitions and each time come out on top. The CEOs vision is. Cons: There are no cons. This company is legendary in the computer industry. Advice to Senior Management: More bonuses and incentives.
    • “Company has lost its way”

      Current Employee — Department Manager in New York, NY. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Used to be a great company to work for with prestige and cared about technology leadership. Now it is just another service and software company. Work/life balance can be managed well.

      Cons: Company has relied on prestige too long and does not pay competitively or provide motivational compensation. No work performance you do can influence your bonus which is typically low. Execs still get well paid though.

      Advice to Senior Management: Empower the lower management. Give them decision making and budgetary authority back. Trust your employees to do the right thing, i.e. their job. Simplify processes to improve agility. Cut out many layers of hierarchy.

    • “IBM Design, not for designers”

      Former Employee — User Experience Designer in Austin, TX. I worked at IBM full-time (more than a year).

      Pros: I can not think of any long-term pros. The honey moon phase will be nice. You'll be wined and dined and promised the world but those are empty promises.

      Cons: Low compensation based on the degree you were able to afford not talent, lack of direction in leadership, false promises to get you through the door, technology is of very low quality or misrepresented to press and outside organizations and very young immature new hires. Feels like a college dorm room a lot of times.

      In the beginning you'll get a phone a call and you'll hear a lot about how IBM Design "will change the world". You'll work on projects "that will change the world". Unfortunately, this will not be the case. There is a lengthy 3 month process called design camp. It is to prepare you for what is like to work at IBM; it is not. It is for those coming directly out of college who have zero work experience but have somehow gotten through the hiring process and need some type of real world experience.

      This creates chaos amongst those who have 1 to 2+ years of experience coming to IBM. There are dedicated recruiters to help find the 1,000+ designers they plan to hire but they bring in the new hires (those are the college students) to also help. They are now judging, commenting and deciding the fates of potential candidates that they are clearly not qualified to do. Immature remarks and fear of working with individuals who are more skillful and qualified make it so great candidates are over looked and passed on. Lots of MFA candidates with no prior job experience; just one degree obtained after another.

      You'll be promised the world and receive very little. When being deployed to your project. you're told by leadership that "hours, even days! went into the process". The process is biased, haphazard and is never explained to you in the least. Nothing about your skill set being a match or what the logic was behind it. If you're lucky you'll work on Watson. Not because it's a good project, but it makes it easier to speak about to others outside the company because of the press and name recognition. 80% of the designers in Austin are trying to maneuver their way to that team because they have zero interest in their current project.

      The Watson tech is weak and not artificial intelligence as it is often described. It does have some advantages and in some ways could be very powerful but there is no magic behind it; not a super computer; there are no such things as super computers. Leadership running Watson is weak and unpredictable. Pitching tech to potential clients and partners that does not exist and is years, possibly even decades from being a potential working product. Even going to the extent as to lie about whether or not a product is actually using a Watson service.

      It is unfortunate that IBM Design has glossed over so much of what IBM company culture is like. Once you're in the door and have your sign on bonus you hear how this is a "long term mission", "the road will be tough". Any good designer has no problem working hard but reaching for an impossible goal is demoralizing. The GM of IBM Design will tell you "how they will write books about the success or failure of IBM Design one day". I'm sure they will write a book about this one day. I have an idea which one it will be.

      Advice to Senior Management: Be honest in your recruiting. Don't sell college students the world and hire more experienced designers. The idea is to retain talent not push them away. Your compensation for junior to mid level designer is low for Austin and NYC. Rank compensation on talent, not the degree they were able to afford. Stop trying to hire 1,000 designers and focus your efforts on steering the Titanic (IBM) away from the iceberg. Be design evangelist to development leaders in the company and not the design police who force feed it down their throats when they won't cooperate.

    • “Working environment varies from group to group, but it is rapidly deteriorating across the board.”

      Current Employee — Research Staff Member in Yorktown Heights, NY. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros:

      • work with very smart people
      • flexibility in work schedules
      • wide range of projects and technical areas.

      Cons:

      • opportunities for career development are scarce
      • minimal raises, vanishing bonuses for non-executives
      • employees come last; sinking morale.
    • “What Ginni is trying to do is right; the executive tiers are completely undermining her at every turn.”

      Former Employee — Anonymous Employee.

      Pros: If you happen to work for a manager who likes you, you'll be fine. If you happen to work in Asia-Pac or India (where IBM is moving jobs to — cheaper), you'll be fine. If you work in a part of the business that's growing, you'll be fine.

      Cons: If you work for a manager who doesn't like you, if you work in a location IBM is moving jobs away from, or in a part of the business that's not growing, you need to be looking to work elsewhere, before IBM "encourages you to leave." And salary/compensation are simply awful.

      Advice to Senior Management: The executive tier (between Band 10 and Ginni — some 6,000 people) are simply killing IBM — there is no accountability for failure. Ginni's top priority shouldn't be to reduce cost or shrink headcount; it should be to replace about half of this tier with executives from outside IBM that understand what it takes to grow the business, manage for profit and growth, and can make IBM relevant again.

    • “A place to grow and learn. Better than any lessons school could teach.”

      Former Employee — Applications Developer. Pros: The people and atmosphere are very laid back and positive while being productive and efficient. Cons: None. They always put their employees first. Advice to Senior Management: Keep being the best.
    • “Most corrupt company on Earth. Business has been gutted to make the top executives rich.”

      Current Employee — Senior Manager in Miami, FL. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Good pay if you're an executive. Many flexible work location jobs.

      Cons: Pay for non executives' retirement is now below poverty line for even senior level people. Retirement doesn't include health benefits. Customers hate IBM and are no longer interested in buying from us.

      Advice to Senior Management: Stop cutting the company to shreds so that you can prosper personally. You have no ethics, and have destroyed our reputation and ability to satisfy customers. Your focus on skills, and statements regarding lack of skills, are WAY off base. We lay off industry leaders every quarter so you can get your bonuses...it's a sad fact.

    • “Excessively wasteful, horrible administrative overhead, incredibly inefficient, 'good ole boy' management structure”

      . Former Employee — IT Operations Manager. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 8 years).

      Pros: Good benefit options, but the employee had to pay for them. They had lots of money, so large projects and improvements could be possible. The name of the company carried weight due to the past company history.

      Cons: I was excited to start working here because they "preached" about how they were so employee driven and how democratic the place was. This turned out to be a complete farce. Everything was top down, "good ole boy" management and promotion.

      The company is way too large and not divided up into small enough business units to be effective. I saw tremendous waste of time, money, and resources.

      I can't fathom this company surviving the next 10 years without a dramatic overhaul. Here is an example. I worked in IT, and had been there before our division was purchased acquired by IBM. Prior to IBM, if something became an issue in our data center, we diagnosed it and fixed it, usually in a very timely manner, say less than one hour.

      Once we became IBM, if this same issue happened, we were not allowed to fix it. We would have to call India and report the issue and be assigned a case number. India had 2 hours to diagnose the issue and try to fix it. If they could not fix it remotely, they would call ATT because IBM had contracts with ATT to fix all the network hardware. ATT had a 4 hour SLA to fix the issue, so now we are talking about a potential 6 hour time frame to fix and issue our team would have fixed before in less than an hour.

      The real kicker is that our division measured time loss at 10 million dollars an hour! Now you're are talking about 60 million dollars over 6 hours. Of course our division CEO would be freaking out to get it fixed, but there was nothing we could do. I sat in countless meetings where this issue would be escalated up to IBM management above our division, and time and time again, no one above us cared.

      So my point is that this company was so big, they didn't give a damn about a 60 million dollar loss, which could have easily been prevented with simple policy changes. This is why I don't recommend working there and can't see them surviving the brave new world.

      Advice to Senior Management: Break the company up into smaller business units, have some core values, principles, and values. Then let the smaller business units function independently.

    • “IBM GBS has a maniacal focus on "utilization", lacks focus on employee development”

      Former Employee — Managing Consultant.

      Pros:

      • Nice to have IBM on your resume (fairly easy to leave and get a better job after IBM because of the brand)
      • Big brand clients across different industries.
      • Lots of material available for self study on your own time (good luck finding time).
      • Old timers are very smart people (can't say the same about the new people being hired at band 9 or higher)

      Cons:

      • I didn't see us adding any real value to our clients, I got the feeling that a lot of poorly-repackaged material, full of buzzwords, was circulated as new intellectual capital. Although this is standard in consulting, it seemed far worse here than elsewhere.
      • I noticed a high turnover rate. New people (APs, Architects etc) coming in, want to immediately impress their managers and I saw a lot of them taking credit for other employees' contribution.
      • There is an insane focus on utilization...IBM wants close to 100% of your time being billed to a client. This leaves very little time for employee development and training since you're working 50-60 hours a week on projects.
      • There's a process for everything. If you haven't been with IBM for a while, it's impossible to figure it out without some handholding (which isn't easy to get).
      • Often feel like you're operating in a void (to be fair this depends on your manager)
      • Compensation is lower than industry standard.

      Advice to Senior Management: Don't let the myopic focus on fulfilling an arbitrary promise to the shareholders (delivering $20 a share in 2015?) derail the values that made IBM a recognizable brand. Invest in employees.

    • “Horrible — run don't walk away”

      Current Employee — Technical Solutions Manager. Pros: Nothing positive to say. It's a dinosaur and might be around, who knows. Out of touch management and execs. Cons: Dog eat dog. Execs are incompetent. Throw employees under the bus every day. Benefits terrible. Out of touch CEO and execs who have no idea on technology; just blog all day. Toxic work environment. Advice to Senior Management: Fire yourself you owe it to the employees. Worthless.
    • “The early years were great, the last several years were stressful”

      Former Employee — Quality Assurance Analyst in Saint Louis, MO. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Working from home has been the biggest benefit lately.

      Cons: Always seem to be worried about next RA and how to stay off the list, raises few and far between, little or no bonuses, working to all hours.

      Advice to Senior Management: Stop focusing on stock price; build a business that provides value to the customer. Put the customer and employees first; the stock price will follow. I was once told by an ex-IBMer "Good Business is good for everybody." Go back to that belief and IBM can once again be a great company both to work for and to do business with.

    • “Really losing credibility in the last two years”

      Former Employee — Senior Project Manager. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Benefits, pension, education opportunities internally.

      Cons: Siloed work environment, change from creative to back in the 1970's style in the last two years, few and minimal salary increases, no support of external sources of learning.

      Advice to Senior Management: Bring back the 360-style of evaluations for management; it seems bullying is standard now. Leadership training for teams. Recognition of remote employees and that they should have at least SOME face time with team members. Reputation is really falling as the trust level with employees has dropped.

    • “IBM, Half Dinosaur, Half Corporate Glutton”

      Current Employee — Manager. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years). Pros: Name still invokes prestige. Cons: Watch your back; there is no loyalty except to money. Advice to Senior Management: Respect all (customers, employees, partners)
    • “Sinking ship”

      Former Employee — Advisory Project Manager. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 8 years). Pros: Work from home and some fairly smart people. Cons: Bureaucratic, process driven, tall silos, no raises and small or non-existent bonuses. Locked into a specific level and few promotions. Advice to Senior Management: Learn to manage people better. Exec management needs to learn practical leadership and that employees are your most valued resource. Stop ignoring them and working to drive them out of the company
    • “IT Architect in Global Services”

      Current Employee — Advisory IT Architect in Poughkeepsie, NY. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Many smart, earnest people work and mentor there. I worked on very interesting projects that helped move my career forward.

      Cons: Absolutely no promotional or monetary advancement. Worked for years with no promotion. When I left my manager had no idea; didn't even know my rank. I left for a huge raise elsewhere for a job that actually has less responsibility. It's clear that executive management is de-investing in the US work force, and I could never recommend to any one.

      Advice to Senior Management: Fire the C-Suite, clean out the board, and start over. Really there is nothing that any one below VP has power to enact so I decline to give advice to line management.

    • “Consulting by Degrees”

      Current Employee — Consultant. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than a year).

      Pros: Pay offer was competitive coming out of school. Definitely not as many hours as banking (unless you are pretty lucky).

      Cons: Management, company culture, promotions/salary increases, morale are all pretty bad.

      Advice to Senior Management: IBM isn't doing so hot right now which has definitely hurt, promotions/salary increases for the last 2 years were pretty low (I will admit, the initial offer was quite high). Morale among people within the company is pretty poor. Many college hires I joined with have left IBM already or are actively looking elsewhere to switch companies.

    • “Stay Away from this Unprofessional Firm.”

      Former Employee — Applications Support Engineer in Gurgaon, Haryana (India). I worked at IBM full-time (less than a year).

      Pros: N/A— Don't recommend this to anyone. No specific HR team. No professionalism.

      Cons: Had an interview with the company in July 2014. Cleared the Tech and HR rounds. And the company contacted my current employer even before releasing offer letter and without my consent. Very unprofessional behavior by these guys. Don't recommend.

      Advice to Senior Management: Have a HR panel set up and look into the concerns by the employees.

    • “Senior Consultant”

      Former Employee — Anonymous Employee.

      Pros:

      • Dynamic company
      • Interesting projects
      • A very diverse work force
      • Good benefits and generous retirement plans
      • Excellent training opportunities for consultants

      Cons:

      • Projects are often very large and long term.
      • It's difficult to move on to new projects
      • Constant travel
      • Average pay
      • Utilization is heavily factored, though often beyond the control of the employee

      Advice to Senior Management: More remote work opportunities for the consulting force. More weight on quality of work and less on the utilization in performance reviews.

    • “Staff Test Engineer”

      Former Employee — Staff Test Engineer in Research Triangle Park, NC. I worked at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Flexible hours, could work from home at times, good benefits, opportunities to travel, excellent people to work with in the organization.

      Cons: Uncertainty of future employment due to down sizing in the US; in recent years the company seemed to be more interested in the balance sheet than in its people.

      Advice to Senior Management: Return the the basic principals that made IBM a company people were proud to work for and made it a successful thriving company.

    • “Good technology gain, not so good management of staff”

      Current Employee — Anonymous Employee. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 10 years).

      Pros: Excellent telework opportunities, great technology exposure, if you're willing to move around within the organization a lot. Unlimited access to RedBooks, the IBM Systems Journal, etc. so whatever you want to learn, you can learn if you're motivated.

      Cons: Leadership is (and has been) woefully lacking. Middle management got there simply because they weren't technical enough in most cases and spend a lot of time managing up. Any time I had concerns about working relationships in the highly matrixed organization, I was told to just find someone else to work with. No team spirit — more of a team competition as there is always the need to justify your position to upper management. Bad energy.

      Advice to Senior Management: Not sure upper management would be reading this they are so out of touch.

    • “Mediocre — stingy company, but good co-workers”

      Current Employee — Senior Consultant in Washington, DC. I have been working at IBM full-time (more than 3 years).

      Pros: Flexible (depending on client) and pretty good work/life balance relative to other firms. Boots on the ground staff are usually very good, 80%+ of the time.

      Very project dependent. Some projects are great, others not so much.

      Middle management is hit or miss, but generally pretty good (bands 8-10).

      Cons: However, senior management (aka management you never see) are not very good and disconnected from middle management. Middle management is not empowered and must try to play along with the changing games created by senior management. Senior management sets unrealistic targets/goals. Many policies are likely driven by IBM corporate, which have negative impacts on the consulting practice (GBS), which needs to operate fundamentally differently than a normal corporation.

      The company is super stingy. It seems as though IBM will do whatever it can to push costs onto the employee. Compared to other firms, it's gotten to the point of being a joke. It can be a challenge to get basic supplies and many staff are still forced to use archaic software such as Word 2003. (I believe they may be starting to upgrade Word 2003 now in 2015.)

      Advice to Senior Management: 1) Carefully assess any cost-cutting measures. Some substantially reduce productivity. Saving $200 on a software license that will end up making your employee lose hours of productivity over several years is dumb. Especially if their bill rate is >$100/hr. Would recoup the cost in less than 2 hours, but instead make you endure and probably lose dozens of hours of productivity over a few years.

      2) Compensate your staff or you will lose them. A new graduate hire should never make more than a prior graduate hire in the same role with an additional 2 years of experience at IBM. Only at IBM does that ever happen.

      3) Stop being short-sighted and driven purely by this quarter's financials. Plan for the long-term.

    • “Not the same IBM”

      Former Employee — Anonymous Employee. Pros: Lots of smart people that work here. Unfortunately, they are not in management. Cons: Employee morale is worse than it has been in 10 years; never know when your product/department or division is going to be let go, sold off, or offshored.
New on the Alliance@IBM Site

Job Cut Reports

  • Comment 03/02/15:

    So I became an ex-IBMer in the UK on 5th Feb 2015. There were not enough voluntary redundancy requests in my section so I was then one of the unlucky ones to be chosen to leave. All this even though I had been told (unofficially) to not apply to voluntary as my request would be rejected. Found it all very hard to deal with but onwards and upwards now and I feel I am better off out! -UKExIBMer-
  • Comment 03/02/15:

    Question for the board. Is anyone familiar with the NJ Unemployment Insurance rules as it applies to the IBM RA? Today is the first official day of unemployment for me. I did receive 24 weeks severance, but I'm hoping that I can file for unemployment and collect now while I'm looking for my next job. Does NJ treat severance payments like regular income when considering eligibility for unemployment payments? Do I need to exhaust my severance payments before I can file for UI? -GinniOnlyCaresAboutEPS-
  • Comment 03/02/15:

    To -GinniOnlyCaresAboutEPS- regarding NJ unemployment. You can file from the 1st day you are no longer employed by IBM. The RA package is not future pay which if it was, then you would have to wait. -tmc-
  • Comment 03/02/15:

    -GinniOnlyCaresAboutEPS- New Jersey doesn't look at severance as regular income, you can file for UI asap. FYI, NJ UI only lasts 6 months, no extensions. Everything can be done online, no need to go to the UI office. https://lwdsso.dol.state.nj.us/amserver/UI/Login?goto=https%3A%2F%2Fnjsuccess.dol.state.nj.us%3A443%2Fnjsuccess&arg=newsession -Jersey Boy-
  • Comment 03/03/15:

    On February 19th, there were 77,308 IBM regulars in the US and 17,444 contractors/vendors. Of the regulars, 13,991 were managers. Today, on March 3rd, there are 75,622 IBM regulars in the US and 18,916 contractors/vendors. Out of the regulars, there are now 13,782 managers. This represents a loss of 1686 regular employees, a gain of 1472 contractors/vendors and a loss of 209 managers.

    IBM supplemental employees and those designated as "assignee-in" or "assignee-out" are all excluded from these numbers.

    Not all people who received their layoff notice had an exit date of Feb. 27th, therefore, the numbers above do not represent the full impact of this RA. Lastly, the deltas above are not strictly limited to the effect of this RA as there are many random hires/fires in any given day. My feeling, however, is that it is statistically representative of the magnitude of the the 1Q RA. -International Bowel Movements-

  • Comment 03/04/15:

    Layoffs coming tomorrow in Canada. Not sure about the US. -Anonymous-
  • Comment 03/04/15:

    I always despised being called — or any colleague being called — a "resource". That nomenclature, which no doubt management thinks is benign, is a good indicator of the IBM employee culture. In my experience, "resource" was used exclusively from the FLM+ level down to the rank and file; does anyone think Martin is referred to by Ginni as a "resource"?

    So with that, it seems that a renaming of HR is in order — to RR (Resource Resources). -FormerIBMer-

  • Comment 03/05/15:

    To -anonymous- in Australia in regards to being let go 15 days before vesting. Sorry to hear about your situation. The only thing I can suggest is to get in touch with an attorney versed in Australian labor law. Yours would not be the first time nor likely last that IBM has violated a country's labor laws or stretched them past the point of intent. The only way to be sure is to get legal advice. If you are unionized that would be another alternative for honest answers. -anonymous_retiree-
  • Comment 03/05/15:

    I received my severance payment in a over night envelope with a hand written note on the outside saying "Look Inside" with a SMILEY face drawn on it, from my manager. How uncaring and unfeeling can someone be. I was never less then a 2 and two days prior then being read the RA script I was informed of my 2014 rating a 2. There is life outside IBM but righting the ship after they bore a hole in it, will take time! -Anonymous-
  • Comment 03/05/15:

    This is incredible that 18% of IBM USA are IBM managers (2 of every 11 regulars IBM employees.) IBM managers and executives are the least qualified to be managers in the entire IT industry. Most of the managers in IBM have n0 college degree in the IT industry, have no communication and negotiation skill, have no clue of what is expected in their departments,and have no leadership qualities. To become a manager in IBM its all about the good old boy network, being a golden boy, and politics.

    Managers in IBM are politically savvy, and are excellent in playing the political game, but the majority have no idea how to be a manager and understand product and how to treat employees with respect. To a IBM manager, it's all about year-end bonuses and the next promotion up the corporate ladder, and how many employees they can screw. IBM needs a union to stop this corrupt practice. -ANA

  • Comment 03/05/15:

    There have been several comments about why employees who have been RA'd are back as contractors, given how poorly treated they have been over the years. For me, the answer is easy. It is strictly financial. I have a mortgage to pay, bills to pay.

    Yes, I applied outside of IBM, but there appears to be some age discrimination going on outside of IBM as well. Never hear back from anyone, and the people who do call back, they always ask why I would want to leave IBM, given the successful career I had.

    I was a long time IBMer and the mistake I made was putting down how many years of experience I had. I think to those dot-com companies or those companies that feature young people on their web site, they look at IBM veterans with an unfair bias that we are hard to work with, set in our ways, etc. When I apply to jobs outside of IBM, I will probably list the number of years as 12, which is the number of years spent in my current profession. -I have a mortgage to pay-

  • Comment 03/05/15:

    @International Bowel Movements: How were you able to retrieve all this data about IBM employees? -Curious-
  • Comment 03/06/15:

    @-Curious-: I am one of those technical IBMers with a knack for locating the raw data and understanding and interpreting it properly. If you need more detail, please send an email to the Alliance. Please consider joining the Alliance (as a full voting member) if you have not already done so. Thank you. -International Bowel Movements-
  • Comment 03/06/15:

    For those that got RA'd my condolences and also congrats. I got RA'd back in 2013 after 33 years always a 1, 2+ or 2. A week before I got whacked my manager told me I was doing a great job and she could always count on me being prepared and that my reps and customers loved me.

    I was 56 at the time and saw two attorneys who said this was age discrimination and there was nothing that could be done. Even my contact at Right Management that IBM sends us for resume help and retraining pulled me aside and told me it was age discrimination.

    Some important tips I learned...if in NJ apply for unemployment insurance right away. Get a new life insurance policy; your IBM policy goes down to $25k if you are lucky enough to retire, and the extra policy with Prudential skyrockets in cost...get this done asap as you get older or get health problems you can be denied or the rate will soar.

    Also when dealing with the IBM Service Center write down names, date, times and who you speak to. They cancelled my health insurance in error (on their part) and I had to fight like hell to get it reinstated.

    Finally take a deep breath and enjoy your time off.

    Get your resumes out there and don't panic. I ended up with a better job, more pay and pay a third of what I paid at IBM for my benefits, and I work 35 hours a week...no more 60-70 hours weeks for a company that does not care.

    For older workers look at websites like USAJOBS.COM...the government is looking for people and they don't look at age...the process takes time but is worth looking into. Good luck! -Anonymous-

  • Comment 03/06/15:

    Help the Alliance determine how many work at your site. Every year between Feb 1st to April 30th IBM and other companies must post an OSHA 300 form that shows the number of work-related injuries on site. It also requires the company to show the number of employees on site. These forms generally are with other legal documents that companies must display publicly. Please let us know what the number of employees are at your site from this document. Let us know if it is for 2013 or 2014. Send the information to ibmunionalliance@gmail.com -Alliance-
  • New York Times:

    The Cost of a Decline in Unions. By Nicholas Kristof. Excerpts: Like many Americans, I’ve been wary of labor unions. ...

    More broadly, I disdained unions as bringing corruption, nepotism and rigid work rules to the labor market, impeding the economic growth that ultimately makes a country strong.

    I was wrong.

    The abuses are real. But, as unions wane in American life, it’s also increasingly clear that they were doing a lot of good in sustaining middle class life — especially the private-sector unions that are now dwindling. ...

    I’ve also changed my mind because, in recent years, the worst abuses by far haven’t been in the union shop but in the corporate suite. One of the things you learn as a journalist is that when there’s no accountability, we humans are capable of tremendous avarice and venality. That’s true of union bosses — and of corporate tycoons. Unions, even flawed ones, can provide checks and balances for flawed corporations.

    Many Americans think unions drag down the economy over all, but scholars disagree. American auto unions are often mentioned, but Germany’s car workers have a strong union, and so do Toyota’s in Japan and Kia’s in South Korea.

    In Germany, the average autoworker earns about $67 per hour in salary and benefits, compared with $34 in the United States. Yet Germany’s car companies in 2010 produced more than twice as many vehicles as American companies did, and they were highly profitable. It’s too glib to say that the problem in the American sector was just unions.

    Or look at American history. The peak years for unions were the 1940s and ’50s, which were also some of the fastest-growing years for the United States ever — and with broadly shared prosperity. Historically, the periods when union membership were highest were those when inequality was least. ...

    Richard B. Freeman, a Harvard labor expert, notes that unions sometimes bring important benefits to industry: They can improve morale, reduce turnover and provide a channel to suggest productivity improvements. ...

    It may be that as unions weakened, executives sometimes grabbed the gains from productivity. Perhaps that helps explain why chief executives at big companies earned, on average, 20 times as much as the typical worker in 1965, and 296 times as much in 2013, according to the Economic Policy Institute.

  • Alliance for Retired Americans Friday Alerts. This week's articles include:
    • King v. Burwell Supreme Court Case: Affordable Care Act Hangs in the Balance
    • Oxfam Report: World’s Top 1% Will Have More Wealth than the other 99% by 2016
    • AFSCME: Poll Shows “Tsunami of a Retirement Crisis” due to 401(k) Schemes
    • Daily Beast Piece Highlights Importance of Social Security Disability Insurance
    • Wisconsin Convention Elects Officers, Draws Distinguished Speakers
    • Medicare Turns 50… Despite Repeated Attempts to Dismantle It
If you hire good people and treat them well, they will try to do a good job. They will stimulate one another by their vigor and example. They will set a fast pace for themselves. Then if they are well led and occasionally inspired, if they understand what the company is trying to do and know they will share in its sucess, they will contribute in a major way. The customer will get the superior service he is looking for. The result is profit to customers, employees, and to stcckholders. —Thomas J. Watson, Jr., from A Business and Its Beliefs: The Ideas That Helped Build IBM.

This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.