Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links

“News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues”—The news you won't see on W3!

Our Friends:

Watching IBM Watching IBM Facebook

Quick Links:

Get involved! Insider trading After IBM Lenovo Employee Discount

Previous highlights:

April 2, 2016 March 26, 2016 March 12, 2016 March 5, 2016 February 27, 2016 February 20, 2016 February 13, 2016 February 6, 2016 January 30, 2016 January 16, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 19, 2015 December 12, 2015 December 5, 2015 November 28, 2015 November 21, 2015 November 14, 2015 November 7, 2015 October 31, 2015 October 24, 2015 October 17, 2015 October 10, 2015 October 3, 2015 September 26, 2015 September 19, 2015 September 12, 2015 August 29, 2015 August 22, 2015 August 15, 2015 August 8, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 25, 2015 July 18, 2015 July 4, 2015 June 27, 2015 June 20, 2015 June 13, 2015 June 6, 2015 May 30, 2015 May 23, 2015 May 16, 2015 May 9, 2015 May 2, 2015 April 25, 2015 April 18, 2015 April 11, 2015 April 4, 2015 March 28, 2015 March 21, 2015 March 14, 2015 March 7, 2015 February 28, 2015 February 21, 2015 February 14, 2015 February 7, 2015 January 31, 2015 January 24, 2015 January 17, 2015 January 10, 2015 January 3, 2015 December 27, 2014 December 20, 2014 December 13, 2014 December 6, 2014 November 29, 2014 November 22, 2014 November 15, 2014 November 8, 2014 November 1, 2014 October 25, 2014 October 18, 2014 October 11, 2014 October 4, 2014 September 27, 2014 September 13, 2014 September 6, 2014 August 30, 2014 August 23, 2014 August 16, 2014 August 9, 2014 August 2, 2014 July 26, 2014 July 19, 2014 July 12, 2014 July 5, 2014 June 28, 2014 June 21, 2014 June 14, 2014 June 7, 2014 May 31, 2014 May 24, 2014 May 17, 2014 May 10, 2014 May 3, 2014 April 26, 2014 April 19, 2014 April 12, 2014 April 5, 2014 March 29, 2014 March 22, 2014 March 15, 2014 March 8, 2014 March 1, 2014 February 22, 2014 February 15, 2014 February 8, 2014 February 1, 2014 January 25, 2014 January 18, 2014 January 11, 2014 January 4, 2014 December 28, 2013 December 21, 2013 December 14, 2013 December 7, 2013 November 30, 2013 November 23, 2013 November 16, 2013 November 9, 2013 November 2, 2013 October 26, 2013 October 19, 2013 October 12, 2013 October 5, 2013 September 28, 2013 September 21, 2013 September 14, 2013 September 7, 2013 August 31, 2013 August 24, 2013 August 17, 2013 August 10, 2013 August 3, 2013 July 27, 2013 July 20, 2013 July 13, 2013 July 6, 2013 June 29, 2013 June 22, 2013 June 15, 2013 June 8, 2013 June 1, 2013 May 25, 2013 May 18, 2013 May 11, 2013 May 4, 2013 April 27, 2013 April 20, 2013 April 13, 2013 April 6, 2013 March 30, 2013 March 23, 2013 March 16, 2013 March 9, 2013 March 2, 2013 February 23, 2013 February 16, 2013 February 9, 2013 February 2, 2013 January 26, 2013 January 19, 2013 January 12, 2013 January 5, 2013 December 29, 2012 December 22, 2012 December 15, 2012 December 8, 2012 December 1, 2012 November 24, 2012 November 17, 2012 November 10, 2012 November 3, 2012 October 27, 2012 October 20, 2012 October 13, 2012 October 6, 2012 September 29, 2012 September 22, 2012 September 15, 2012 September 8, 2012 September 1, 2012 August 25, 2012 August 18, 2012 August 11, 2012 August 4, 2012 July 28, 2012 July 21, 2012 July 14, 2012 July 7, 2012 June 30, 2012 June 23, 2012 June 16, 2012 June 9, 2012 June 2, 2012 May 26, 2012 May 19, 2012 May 12, 2012 May 5, 2012 April 28, 2012 April 21, 2012 April 14, 2012 April 7, 2012 March 31, 2012 March 24, 2012 March 17, 2012 March 10, 2012 March 3, 2012 February 25, 2012 February 18, 2012 February 11, 2012 February 4, 2012 January 28, 2012 January 21, 2012 January 14, 2012 January 7, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 24, 2011 December 17, 2011 December 10, 2011 December 3, 2011 November 26, 2011 November 19, 2011 November 12, 2011 November 5, 2011 October 29, 2011 October 22, 2011 October 15, 2011 October 8, 2011 October 1, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 17, 2011 September 10, 2011 September 3, 2011 August 27, 2011 August 20, 2011 August 13, 2011 August 6, 2011 July 30, 2011 July 23, 2011 July 16, 2011 July 9, 2011 July 2, 2011 June 25, 2011 June 18, 2011 June 11, 2011 June 4, 2011 May 28, 2011 May 21, 2011 May 14, 2011 May 7, 2011 April 30, 2011 April 23, 2011 April 16, 2011 April 9, 2011 April 2, 2011 March 26, 2011 March 19, 2011 March 12, 2011 March 5, 2011 February 26, 2011 February 19, 2011 February 12, 2011 February 5, 2011 January 29, 2011 January 22, 2011 January 15, 2011 January 8, 2011 January 1, 2011 December 25, 2010 December 18, 2010 December 11, 2010 December 4, 2010 November 27, 2010 November 20, 2010 November 13, 2010 November 6, 2010 October 30, 2010 October 23, 2010 October 16, 2010 October 9, 2010 October 2, 2010 September 25, 2010 September 18, 2010 September 11, 2010 September 4, 2010 August 28, 2010 August 21, 2010 August 14, 2010 August 7, 2010 July 31, 2010 July 24, 2010 July 17, 2010 July 10, 2010 July 3, 2010 June 26, 2010 June 19, 2010 June 12, 2010 June 5, 2010 May 29, 2010 May 22, 2010 May 15, 2010 May 8, 2010 May 1, 2010 April 24, 2010 April 17, 2010 April 10, 2010 April 3, 2010 March 27, 2010 March 20, 2010 March 13, 2010 March 6, 2010 February 27, 2010 February 20, 2010 February 13, 2010 February 6, 2010 January 30, 2010 January 23, 2010 January 16, 2010 January 9, 2010 January 2, 2010 December 26, 2009 December 19, 2009 December 12, 2009 December 5, 2009 November 28, 2009 November 21, 2009 November 14, 2009 November 7, 2009 October 31, 2009 October 24, 2009 October 17, 2009 October 10, 2009 October 3, 2009 September 26, 2009 September 19, 2009 September 12, 2009 September 5, 2009 August 29, 2009 August 22, 2009 August 15, 2009 August 8, 2009 August 1, 2009 July 25, 2009 July 18, 2009 July 11, 2009 July 4, 2009 June 27, 2009 June 20, 2009 June 13, 2009 June 6, 2009 May 30, 2009 May 23, 2009 May 16, 2009 May 9, 2009 May 2, 2009 April 25, 2009 April 18, 2009 April 11, 2009 April 4, 2009 March 28, 2009 March 21, 2009 March 14, 2009 March 7, 2009 February 28, 2009 February 21, 2009 February 14, 2009 February 7, 2009 January 31, 2009 January 24, 2009 January 17, 2009 January 10, 2009 January 03, 2009 December 27, 2008 December 20, 2008 December 13, 2008 December 6, 2008 November 29, 2008 November 22, 2008 November 15, 2008 November 8, 2008 November 1, 2008 October 25, 2008 October 18, 2008 October 11, 2008 October 4, 2008 September 27, 2008 September 20, 2008 September 13, 2008 September 6, 2008 August 30, 2008 August 23, 2008 August 16, 2008 August 9, 2008 August 2, 2008 July 26, 2008 July 19, 2008 July 12, 2008 July 5, 2008 June 28, 2008 June 21, 2008 June 14, 2008 June 7, 2008 May 31, 2008 May 24, 2008 May 17, 2008 May 10, 2008 2008 Stock Meeting April 26, 2008 April 19, 2008 April 12, 2008 April 5, 2008 March 29, 2008 March 22, 2008 March 15, 2008 March 8, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 16, 2008 February 9, 2008 February 2, 2008 January 26, 2008 January 19, 2008 January 12, 2008 January 5, 2008 December 29, 2007 December 22, 2007 December 15, 2007 December 8, 2007 December 1, 2007 November 24, 2007 November 17, 2007 November 10, 2007 November 3, 2007 October 27, 2007 October 20, 2007 October 13, 2007 October 6, 2007 September 29, 2007 September 22, 2007 September 15, 2007 September 8, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 25, 2007 August 18, 2007 August 11, 2007 August 4, 2007 July 28, 2007 July 21, 2007 July 14, 2007 July 7, 2007 June 30, 2007 June 23, 2007 June 16, 2007 June 9, 2007 June 2, 2007 May 26, 2007 May 19, 2007 May 12, 2007 May 5, 2007 2007 Stock Meeting April 21, 2007 April 14, 2007 April 7, 2007 March 31, 2007 March 24, 2007 March 17, 2007 March 10, 2007 March 3, 2007 February 24, 2007 February 17, 2007 February 10, 2007 February 3, 2007 January 27, 2007 January 20, 2007 January 13, 2007 January 6, 2007 December 30, 2006 December 23, 2006 December 16, 2006 December 9, 2006 December 2, 2006 November 25, 2006 November 18, 2006 November 11, 2006 November 4, 2006 October 28, 2006 October 21, 2006 October 14, 2006 October 7, 2006 September 30, 2006 September 23, 2006 September 16, 2006 September 9, 2006 September 2, 2006 August 26, 2006 August 19, 2006 August 12, 2006 August 5, 2006 July 29, 2006 July 22, 2006 July 15, 2006 July 8, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 24, 2006 June 17, 2006 June 10, 2006 June 3, 2006 May 27, 2006 May 20, 2006 May 13, 2006 May 6, 2006 2006 Stock Meeting April 22, 2006 April 15, 2006 April 8, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 25, 2006 March 18, 2006 March 11, 2006 March 4, 2006 February 25, 2006 February 18, 2006 February 11, 2006 February 4, 2006 January 28, 2006 January 21, 2006 January 14, 2006 January 7, 2006 December 31, 2005 December 24, 2005 December 17, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 03, 2005 November 26, 2005 November 19, 2005 November 12, 2005 November 5, 2005 October 29, 2005 October 22, 2005 October 15, 2005 October 8, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 24, 2005 September 17, 2005 September 10, 2005 September 3, 2005 August 27, 2005 August 20, 2005 August 13, 2005 August 6, 2005 July 30, 2005 July 23, 2005 July 16, 2005 July 9, 2005 July 2, 2005 June 25, 2005 June 18, 2005 June 11, 2005 June 4, 2005 May 28, 2005 May 21, 2005 May 14, 2005 May 7, 2005 April 30, 2005 April 23, 2005 April 16, 2005 April 9, 2005 April 2, 2005 March 26, 2005 March 19, 2005 March 12, 2005 March 5, 2005 February 26, 2005 February 19, 2005 February 12, 2005 February 5, 2005 January 29, 2005 January 22, 2005 January 15, 2005 January 8, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 25, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 11, 2004 December 4, 2004 November 27, 2004 November 20, 2004 November 13, 2004 November 6, 2004 October 30, 2004 October 23, 2004 October 16, 2004 October 9, 2004 October 2, 2004 September 25, 2004 September 18, 2004 September 11, 2004 September 4, 2004 August 28, 2004 August 21, 2004 August 14, 2004 August 7, 2004 July 31, 2004 July 24, 2004 July 17, 2004 July 10, 2004 July 3, 2004 June 26, 2004 June 19, 2004 June 5, 2004 May 29, 2004 May 22, 2004 May 15, 2004 May 8, 2004 2004 Stock Meeting April 24, 2004 April 10, 2004 April 3, 2004 March 27, 2004 March 20, 2004 March 13, 2004 March 6, 2004 February 28, 2004 February 21, 2004 February 14, 2004 February 7, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 18, 2004 December 27, 2003 December 20, 2003 December 13, 2003 December 6, 2003 November 29, 2003 November 22, 2003 November 15, 2003 November 8, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 25, 2003 October 18, 2003 October 11, 2003 October 4, 2003 September 27, 2003 September 20, 2003 September 13, 2003 September 6, 2003 August 30, 2003 August 23, 2003 August 16, 2003 August 9, 2003 Pension Lawsuit Win July 26, 2003 July 19, 2003 July 12, 2003 July 5, 2003 June 28, 2003 June 21, 2003 June 14, 2003 June 7, 2003 May 31, 2003 May 24, 2003 May 17, 2003 May 10, 2003 2003 Stock Meeting April 26, 2003 April 19, 2003 April 12, 2003 April 5, 2003 March 29, 2003 March 22, 2003 March 15, 2003 March 8, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 22, 2003 February 15, 2003 February 8, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 25, 2003 January 18, 2003 January 11, 2003 January 4, 2003 December 28, 2002 December 21, 2002 December 14, 2002 December 7, 2002 November 30, 2002 November 23, 2002 November 16, 2002 November 9, 2002 November 2, 2002 October 26, 2002 October 19, 2002 October 12, 2002 October 5, 2002 September 28, 2002 September 21, 2002 September 14, 2002 September 7, 2002 August 31, 2002 August 24, 2002 August 17, 2002 August 10, 2002 August 3, 2002 July 27, 2002 July 20, 2002 July 13, 2002 July 6, 2002 June 29, 2002 June 22, 2002 June 15, 2002 June 8, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 25, 2002 May 18, 2002 May 11, 2002 2002 Stock Meeting April 27, 2002 April 20, 2002 April 13, 2002 April 6, 2002 March 30, 2002 March 23, 2002 March 16, 2002 March 9, 2002 March 2, 2002 February 23, 2002 February 16, 2002 February 9, 2002 February 2, 2002 January 26, 2002 January 19, 2002 January 12, 2002 January 5, 2002 December 29, 2001 December 22, 2001 December 15, 2001 December 8, 2001 December 1, 2001 November 24, 2001 November 17, 2001 November 10, 2001 November 3, 2001 October 27, 2001 October 20, 2001 October 13, 2001 October 6, 2001 September 29, 2001 September 22, 2001 September 15, 2001 September 8, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 25, 2001 August 18, 2001 August 11, 2001 August 4, 2001 July 28, 2001 July 21, 2001 July 14, 2001 July 7, 2001 June 30, 2001 June 23, 2001 June 16, 2001 June 9, 2001 June 2, 2001 May 26, 2001 May 19, 2001 May 12, 2001 May 5, 2001 2001 Stock Meeting April 21, 2001 April 14, 2001 April 7, 2001 March 31, 2001 March 24, 2001 March 17, 2001 March 10, 2001 March 3, 2001 February 24, 2001 February 17, 2001 February 10, 2001 February 3, 2001 January 27, 2001 January 20, 2001 January 13, 2001 January 6, 2001 December 30, 2000 December 23, 2000 December 16, 2000 December 9, 2000 December 2, 2000 November 24, 2000 November 17, 2000 November 10, 2000 November 4, 2000 October 28, 2000 October 21, 2000 October 14, 2000 October 7, 2000 September 30, 2000 September 23, 2000 September 16, 2000 September 9, 2000 September 2, 2000 August 26, 2000 August 19, 2000 August 12, 2000 July 29, 2000 July 22, 2000 July 15, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 24, 2000 June 17, 2000 June 10, 2000 June 3, 2000 May 27, 2000 May 20, 2000 May 13, 2000 May 6, 2000 April, 2000

Highlights—August 4, 2012

  • CIO: IBM Beats Indiana in Outsourcing Case No One 'Deserves to Win'. A rare and costly judgment in favor of the IT service provider yields lessons about the folly of public sector mega outsourcing deals, the importance of a detailed contract, and why IT can't outsource responsibility. By Stephanie Overby. Excerpts: "Neither party deserves to win this case." So begins the judge's order in the legal outsourcing battle between the state of Indiana and its former IT service provider IBM. While deciding last week that Indiana failed to prove that IBM materially breached its 2006 $1.6 billion contract with the state, Marion County Judge David Dreyer wrote: "This story represents a 'perfect storm' of misguided government policy and overzealous corporate ambition. Overall, both parties are to blame and Indiana's taxpayers are left as apparent losers."

    Indiana initially sued IBM for the $437 million it paid the provider for what it said was a failed welfare system overhaul, an amount that was later reduced to approximately $170 million. IBM countersued for $100 million that it claimed it was owed by the state. Judge Dreyer awarded Big Blue $12 million for the equipment retained by the state. ...

    It was a rare judgment in favor of an outsourcing provider that should serve as a wakeup call for all IT leaders. "Buyers have a tendency to select big-box service providers, because they feel more secure operating under the notion that if something goes wrong they can always sue [them] and recoup their losses," says Paul Pinto, managing partner at outsourcing consultancy Sylvan Advisory. "Buyers believe that the larger service providers will not be willing to endure the bad publicity associated with a law suit. The result of this case clearly displays the contrary." ...

    Pinto isn't surprised that IBM walked away unscathed. "IBM prides itself on its ability to write and negotiate onerous contract terms. They have developed this skill through many years of experience, and wield it artfully," he says. " Even though IBM did not perform in alignment with the intent of the agreement, they were deemed to have satisfied the letter of the law."

    IBM was able to avoid material breach of the contract by meeting somewhere between 50 and 80 percent of its service levels. "Surprisingly, the court minimized problems that many IT managers would find unforgiveable, including a 48 hour call center outage, and readily gave IBM a pass for the difficult and politicized environment in which it was working," Parks says.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • This is what Indiana gets for outsourcing. This is what IBM gets for global labor arbitrage. IBM may have "won" this case, but it was a pyrrhic victory at best. Every organization with an ounce of common sense will now think long and hard about the wisdom of outsourcing to big-name companies, because the safeguards they thought they had have now been shown to be imaginary. And outsourcing to smaller, less well known outsourcing providers? You gotta be kidding. IBM just ruined the reputation of outsourcing altogether. There were American IT people decrying the wisdom of outsourcing for the last decade plus, and they were always denounced as xenophobes, racists, and luddites. But they can now rise up in unison and sing, "We told you so" as time has proved the naysayers right.
    • Typical Big Blue. They have gutted their projects of American workers, doubled the workload of existing employees, and staffed their projects with H1B workers and offshore labor. The customer satisfaction is in the basement, but they don't care because they are milking the government cow. Take a look at Child Welfare Services and Medi-Cal in California and you will see what I mean.

  • NET(net): Top 10 Reasons Why Ginni Rometty Will Fail as IBM’s New CEO. By Steven Zolman. Excerpts: IBM’s first female CEO, Virginia “Ginni” Rometty, is in after Sam Palmisano parachutes out with $127 million, but not until he leaves a wake of wreckage in his trail. Ginni will have big challenges to overcome if she is to be successful leading IBM, and in this blog, I will outline the Top 10 Reasons Why Ginni Rometty Will Fail as IBM’s new CEO. ...

    3. IBM Executives are out of Touch. IBM has gone through major transformations before, and the last major transformation was designed to make the company more lean, more efficient, and able to make better decisions. One of the stated objectives of that reorganization was to reduce bloat, simplify management, and connect the company to the decision makers so they would make better business decisions faster and more effectively. Today, IBM has more layers of management than it did before these efforts, and that executive bloat has not only cost the organization more money, it has further insulated top decision makers from developing a real understanding of the business, and therefore their decisions are not as good as they can be. What’s worse; there is no real accountability for these bad decisions because they don’t see the real field impact, and are not able to decipher what’s working and what isn’t, rendering them as useless politicians that merely manage their careers. ...

    4. IBM’s Sales Culture is Poison. IBM’s sales culture has nearly ruined the company as many of its executives have no real knowledge about the products and services they sell, rather an obsessive desire for more “high margin” sales. IBM’s sales aspirations, and its plan to achieve those objectives, will ruin the company if not revised. IBM has developed growth objectives for earnings, and all indicators of the plan to achieve these aggressive targets seem to come at the expense of jobs, primarily jobs based in the USA – in favor of shipping them overseas, as this is thought to be ‘less costly’. The scale of a reduction required to achieve the aggressive growth targets for earnings suggest that while executives and sales folks will stay, most everyone else will need to go. The staff changes will require massive cuts in technical folks. ...

    5. IBM’s Executive Compensation is Misaligned. IBM has aligned executive compensation to its earnings per share targets, and if the executives achieve their targets, again, primarily by downgrading skilled workers in the USA, and moving labor from the USA to lower cost countries, which will be a move that kills the ability of the company to innovate and solve complex problems, they get stock incentives. This executive compensation misalignment continues to drive behaviors towards activities that are killing the organization, yet the strategic plan hasn’t changed, nor has the executive compensation arrangement changed since Ginni’s arrival. ...

    6. IBM’s Rape, Pillage & Burn Acquisition Strategy. This is an area where IBM deserves some credit. At least they get the sequencing right. If they were to burn first, they wouldn’t be able to rape & pillage, so at the very least, let’s give them credit for knowing how to ruin a company properly. One of the ways IBM has cloaked its demise is to continue to buy highly profitable businesses with the hoards of cash the company controls. Once they do buy a new company, however, as a matter of routine, they saddle those organizations with bloated IBM processes, force them through standards processes that strip out much that was special, unique and cool about the acquired entity, they increase charges back to the mother ship to siphon off profits, and ultimately, they make the company no longer able to satisfy its customers, who eventually leave. Once IBM has sucked out all the blood, they leave the body for dead and go find another new company to buy (and subsequently ruin). ...

    7. IBM’s Offshore Model will kill its Services Business. I hear a lot of people say that IBM is a services company. Well if that’s the case, they are actively trying to commit suicide by killing off their services business. Over the last five years, IBM has aggressively pursued an offshore staffing model, seemingly believing that more unskilled workers are a more effective way to do business than having fewer higher skilled workers. Apparently, IBM doesn’t understand that you can’t outsource making a baby in a month to nine women in India. Not only does this create problems with logistics, language, communications and other issues, it eliminates the organization’s ability to solve complex problems. Many of our clients who subscribe to this model are dramatically disappointed with IBM’s lack of effectiveness on resolving issues, and amazed at how long it takes, and how many people it requires to get resolution. The aggressive offshore model particularly affects IBM Global Services, which represents a disproportionate share of revenue and employee head count, so the impact here will be severe. In the last 18 months, NET(net) has noticed a sharp increase in the number of disenfranchised clients who have terminated their agreements with IBM and sought arrangements with other suppliers. If Ginni allows the IBM Offshore model to continue in Global Services, the company will further convolute its ability to execute, become less able to solve complex problems, and will continue to lose more business at a faster rate. ...

    10. IBM Seems to be Preparing to Sell is Services Business. Like IBM jettisoned the PC business years ago, citing a highly commoditized market and the inability to make enough profit, IBM’s services business is under similar pressure and may be being secretly prepared for sale. Feedback from insiders suggests that the cuts are so deep in recent months, that there is really no other viable explanation other than the services business is being prepared for sale.

    Selected reader comments follow:

    • I left IBM last year after 17 good years exactly on the reasons described here. Instead of a technical vision and strategy, the only strategy during the past years were profit making and share price development. Firing people and spending billions for share-buy-back programs and top-management boni is not good for customers/partners/employees. Everything said here about the management is true. Most of them (of course there are exceptions!) have NO idea of their own products, nor the competitive situations. They very much focus on numbers on their own career rather than customers, employees or a sustainable strategy for the company. Next quarter is beyond their horizon.
    • I have never seen anything this true and to the point about IBM and its current executive team; their strategy and lack of vision. It also was spot on regarding their M&A, they have killed successful businesses, including the acquisition of their Service arm by who else on the helm but Ginny, who is now divesting it, making it ready for sale. I have been involved in 4 of such acquisitions and have seen a list of companies who were bought and then destroyed after being "blue-washed," It pains me to see that bunch of career politicians, as you called them, are ruining IBM; an AMERICAN ICON.

      I wish there was a watchdog organization or a technology group that could arrest IBM's self-serving current executive team, send them to jail till they have their day in the court for crimes against humanity, technology, and also against America. Ginny is just like rest of them, she grew up in IBM. She doesn't think there is anything wrong, or she would have fixed it by firing these leaches to bring in a team of intelligent, competent leaders who care for IBM, its clients, and its high skilled employees who are either leaving to competition or escorted out by IBM security. All is left is these career politicians/prostitutes who want nothing but EPS for obvious reasons, they are worst than blood suckers.

      Thanks for your article, so I am not the only one who sees it this way. I am sure the market and clients think the same, or a huge list of clients including multi billion dollar Disney wouldn't have left IBM just a short while ago. I am very worried for IBM!!!

  • Center for Immigration Studies: IBM: "The Cost Difference Is Too Great for the Business Not to Look for" H-1B Workers. By John Miano. Excerpts: Workers from around the country send me examples of H-1B abuse that is taking place around them. I organize this data to decipher patterns. There is usually no legal action that can be taken due to the way the law is structured and the circumstances of the information provider. Generally, I just collect.

    Separately, I have been preparing a case in which discrimination against Americans in favor of foreign workers is a factor. As part of the preparation I have been collecting advertisements from companies that say they only want foreign workers.

    The companies that publicly advertise illegal recruitment tend to be small. Many of these small companies publish lists of companies they supply workers to. I compiled the advertisements and customer lists in a database and found a striking feature in the data. The median percentage for companies showing up as customers of companies making foreign-workers-only advertisements was 1 percent. However, at the high end there is a small cluster of customer companies that show up much more frequently. IBM leads the pack here, being claimed as a customer by 35 percent of the companies only seeking foreign workers. Let me rephrase that. Among advertisements seeking only foreign workers that had lists of companies it supplied these workers to, over one-third listed IBM (With Verizon and JPMorgan Chase close behind).

    The frequency with which IBM appears suggested that I should return to my IBM collection and write about it. One item in the collection seemed particularly appropriate for showing how H-1B abuse takes place in big corporations behind the scenes.

    An American IBM employee sent me an e-mail chain among the employee, IBM hiring managers, and IBM HR that shows how IBM flagrantly violates the law in regard H-1B usage and immigration status discrimination. ...

    Now let me set the stage for the e-mail chain. An American IBM employee in the United States had been working on a software development project for a customer that had recently ended. The employee needed to find another project to avoid being laid off, as it is easier to lay off people who are not working on projects.

    The American IBM employee was on an internal IBM mailing list for employees who were available for a new project. The IBM employee received a timely mass e-mail through this list from IBM HR with a job description that started out:

    We are urgently seeking Business Analyst resources with Test experience for two positions on the Alcatel-Lucent account (emphasis in original).

    A lengthy job description and instructions on how to apply followed this introduction. (IBM uses the term "resource" throughout to refer to employees.) The job was located in the United States and the American IBM employee lived close to the project.

    The American IBM employee responded to the job posting with a cover letter explaining how the employee's qualifications matched the posted job requirements, the additional information requested in the job posting, and a resume.

    This is the IBM hiring manager's complete response to the American IBM employee's application (The IBM employee provided translations of acronyms that I have indicated in square brackets.):

    Thank you for your interest in the eBusiness Analyst position on the Alcatel-Lucent account. We are in the process of gathering resumes for this position and will send you a follow-up response once we have had an opportunity to review your qualifications.

    Please understand the clients first preference is IGSI [IBM Global Services India] landed resource, then local US candidates, then remote, so these candidates will be in the second group to be considered. (sic)

    This manager was forcing Americans to get in line for jobs behind "landed resources" from IBM India. In case you are wondering — yes, this is illegal.

    So how can IBM so flagrantly violate the law?

    The reason IBM can get away with this disgraceful behavior is that discrimination enforcement requires a complaint. An employee considering a complaint has to weigh the probability of the government prosecuting the case and winning adequate compensation against the risk of retaliation and damage to his or her career. Many companies make severance packages contingent upon employees signing away rights to file such a complaint.

  • Yahoo! IBM Employee Issues message board: "Re: Undercover Boss?" by Paul Sutera. Excerpts: We have growth market employees here on rotation. We're always very polite and helpful, especially with regards to dining, hotels, etc. I do not train anyone as no-one trained me. Forwarding a link to a helpful manual, sure. And in the growth market there are layoffs which are more like culling the herd. 1000 low-level employees were fired in India last year. There have even been layoffs in Singapore - anywhere wages are high and there are no unions.

    So once again IBM is going back to UK, Australia - any country with high wages and no unions - to do more R/A's. It's the same countries over and over. Of course IBM would salivate over layoffs in the EU, but many of these employees are unionized and severance packages are mandated to be large. The long-term savings of laying off an IBM Italy employee and paying them 2 years pay as severance for a long-term employee - these do not interest IBM Senior management. It's all about destroying a career to show increased profit in 6 months.

    Only an employees union will stop management thuggery. It will also help IBM keep more USA and Canadian customers. Win-win, unless you are Ginny, Sam, Randy.

  • Glassdoor IBM reviews. Selected reviews follow:
    • Innovation no more” Current Software Engineer in Dallas, TX . Pros: Brand and company are great to have on your resume, everyone knows big blue. Cons: Innovation in the company is less and less the focus is shifting more and more to cater to Wall Street. The days of IBM being a company of thinkers and great innovators is long gone. For employees especially American based, every day is lived in fear that today will be your last. Raises and bonuses even for top performers are below standards if even given at all. Negotiate up front only newer employees from outside have remotely competitive base salaries, once in be prepared to live with that salary regardless of duties position or band prerequisites. If cost of living and above average performance combined is worth 1 or 2% a year then this is the place for you. Advice to Senior Management: Stop robbing Peter to pay Paul, invest in your employees, stop off shoring, promote innovation and give a darn about the folks that are earning you your PBC and bonuses.
    • IBM's Political views and offshore jobs” Former Global Operations Manager in Somerset, KY. Pros: Insurance, 401K and vacations. Also a work life balance. Cons: Bad management and way too many resource actions, non-stability and no job security . Way too many political games and not enough employee morale and too many of American jobs sent overseas. Advice to Senior Management: Go back to management school
    • Not much growth opportunities” Current Advisory Systems Analyst in Calcutta (India). Pros: You have the option/liberty of working from home for many projects. Work time is flexible, they do not monitor your check in and check out time for the day. Decent onsite opportunities and the salary at onsite is better than many other Indian companies. Cons: There is not much scope in growing in technical roles. The annual hike % is lower than the other top Indian companies, so not the best place to work for remuneration-wise. Promotion is not automatic after spending x number of years in a band. You have to fight hard (coupled with buttering your management) for band movement, including documenting reasons why you deserve promotion (it's a part of the promotion process!) Advice to Senior Management: Upper management should be more approachable and should hold regular meetings/discussions with employees to understand their career goals, aspirations and concern
    • Good company, great benefits, needs employee development tweaking” Current Anonymous Employee. Pros: Flexible work environment, competitive salary and benefits, dedicated workforce, culturally very diverse and progressive. Cons: No room for upward growth, no incentive - financial, growth, options - to give it my all, company has changed to 100% shareholder focus in the last 5 years. Little to no bonuses for high performance. Do much more to contribute to life/work balance, like management directed time off the week following weekend workdays, or accrual of additional vacation days, etc. Advice to Senior Management: Walk the walk. Many programs are in place to self manage career aspirations, but the information is scattered, and there is no single place to be told what it will take to get a promotion, a salary increase, or other types of advancement.
    • Horrible Managers” Former Accountant in New York, NY. Pros: I met some really good friends at the job. I have nothing else positive to say! Cons: People who have no clue what they are doing are promoted while hard workers are left to be the work horse and told it's what the company needs right now. These people who are promoted can not even orally present and tell management straight to their face what they will and won't do and others are killed with 2x the amount of work while others model around in short skirts and heels. Advice to Senior Management: Open your eyes and not just promote the "brown-nosers" cause at the end of the day they come asking us for help doing their jobs.
    • “Learning about working on a international company” Current Security Compliance Coordinator in Buenos Aires (Argentina). Pros: You learn a lot, company politics, quality process, relate with people of different areas. You also discover the inside of a whole new world within that sometimes will help you to become a better worker. Cons: –Working on a international company will show you that sometimes your effort is not enough. Corporate policies are not fair most of times and in most cases the people that are managing you will not help you out to become a better worker or guide you. Advice to Senior Management: Not everything is for a profit, I have seen experts quit the company for the bad treatment they provide to their employees. At the long run, we not only loose perfectly and capable workers we also lost accounts and money for it.
    • Great place to learn, not-so-good place to earnPros: 1. Solid foundation on processes, learning, systems thinking. This is particularly important for someone who is starting his or her career. Or if someone is moving in from a small company. IBM provides the necessary appreciation of how large corporations need to work, the linkages between different functions. 2. Scale of work - depending on your role in the company, you get opportunities to paint on a really large canvas 3. Work from home. I am torn on this one. On paper, and for most roles, this is such a great thing to have. Particularly, for working mothers, PWDs etc. However, this also tends to mean that work never ceases - whether you are at work or at home.

      Cons: 1. Poor Salary -- IBM takes people at lower salary, and then pushes them even lower every year. The annual increment is marginal (if at all) and much below the inflation levels. If you work for IBM for a few years, you would have a salary way behind market parity, thanks to years of being undercut. 2. Slow career progression -- goes hand in hand with salary. Don't be surprised to see your friends and peers outside IBM in much senior positions, while you have hardly made any progress in your career ladder at IBM. 3. Stifling bureaucracy -- one of those companies where 1 employee has 3-4 managers, each bringing additional complexity and reporting.

      Advice to Senior Management: 1. Integrate first inside, before trying to integrate outside to clients 2. Treat employees to a little more than mere words - they work because they need to put food on the table, and do the things their friends and peers outside IBM are doing. It costs money, money that an IBMer doesn't get paid today.

    • Global Business Services: Safe, but poor reward” Former Consultant in Chicago, IL. Pros: – Safety in Job; consistent long-term projects; training both classroom, e-learning, and client-site training was excellent. Cons: Poor reward for performance. Partners were forced to dust off age-old PWC policies to reward performance and even that was well below par. Travel policies ruined by long time IBM sales teams taking advantage. Travel policies can't compete with flexibility required by clients of a consulting firm. Need to be separated. HR policies get worse each year. Impressively bad decisions taken on behalf of 420,000 employees and in no way reflect how a consulting firm should be run. Loses a lot of ground against the private firms (i.e., Deloitte). Advice to Senior Management: Outsource HR management and travel policy. These are two bloated overhead costs that restrict growth of your business. Assume the need to "be seen to be doing something" each year is the reason they come up with incredibly painful and growth smothering policies that cannot let the firm run at it's potential. Separate out policies for your core hardware/software sales business away from your services businesses. Everyone shouldn't have to suffer because of a few bad apples in your traditional sales depts.
    • IBM India Pvt. Ltd. - A mixed review” Former Systems Engineer in Bangalore (India). Pros: Awesome work culture. Best opportunity to learn and grow within the organization. Cons: Management will now give time for anything else during office hours. Biased more towards Ladies. Ladies get Bunkers with bed to sleep. Poor boys have to their chair to sleep. Advice to Senior Management: Nothing. I think they do their job properly. Its just the way they it. :(
    • IT - Unix Admin 15+ years” Former Software Engineer in Denver, CO. Pros: Work at home is about the only plus I can think of. Benefits are sub-par. Cons: Never ending work flow, expect to put in 10-12 hours a day. Very little room for advancement, most moves blocked because of job cuts and off-shoring. Advice to Senior Management: Be honest and forthright about the future. Everything can't really be a secret can it?
    • You are in charge of your career at IBM.” Current Technical Sales in Philadelphia, PA. Pros: Great people work for IBM. Unfortunately, not very many of them work in management. Cons: Lots and lots of hoops to jump through for no particular reason. Sales organization is very political (not unusual, but stressful nonetheless). Commissions for sales don't always go to the people who made the sale happen. In services, the travel is never-ending and the hours are long. Advice to Senior Management: Don't take all the money for yourselves.
    • A life time experience or some average company?” Former N/A in Cairo (Egypt). Pros: I.B.M. International business machine, one of the first computer companies in the world and the biggest in 2009 reviews; a multinational with over 100k employee world wide; a positive and strong name in your C.V.; a very professional company, try to meet the average employee with the necessary needs; a good place to start if your a fresh graduate. Cons: – No extra - Real - experience. You "have" to debate strongly your salary or you will be cut of short, and if comparing the offered salary and other competitive you would never consider IBM-GPS Egypt. If you are qualified you'll notice that you are given the same job responsibilities and salary of not only a fresh graduate with no experience, but also people who did not even graduate but not given any challenges to meet your qualification what so ever. Advice to Senior Management: –My personal advice is to work on the employees you have, it is not necessary that a senior agent who has been working with you for 4-5-6 or even 10 years is more qualified than a newbie, also consider the qualification and the personal skills that the employee have and make use out of it, get to know them, work with them, you'll even find many that are even better than their managers.
    • Resource Action” Former Procurement in Fishkill, NY. Pros: High tech industry. lots of benefits good salaries. Cons: Too big to recognize workers. Focusing on cutting costs to the detriment of its workforce. Advice to Senior Management: Work with people.
    • Struggles with going global” Current Senior Software Development Manager in Austin, TX. Pros: Opportunities to easily move around to job assignments globally Leadership development opportunities are endless for business leaders. Because IBM has very experienced leaders (10-40 years of experience) there is a lot of wisdom. In addition IBM has invested heavily in this space keeping the skill current. Family friendly - good benefits, flexible work schedules Excellent virtual tools to facilitate global collaboration.

      Cons: Lack of investment in the US - Most of the new talent is being hired abroad, which means tomorrow's future leaders will be in these growth markets (China, India, Russia, Brazil).

      A large portion of US technical talent is wasted on educating cheaper later in the growth markets. The end result is poor quality products developed by a large number inexperienced developers. A better quality product could be achieved with a smaller, more experienced team. There needs to be a finer line established between the people responsible for training and the people responsible for delivering good products. Almost no one has demonstrated the ability to do both at the same time.

      IBM is not as selective as they should be in terms of technical talent. Instead of hiring the top technical talent selectively, they hire a large number of less talented individuals. Occasionally this works out OK as people can grow. However, this often results in poorly designed products that do not meet customer expectations.

      It takes too long to fire incompetent engineers due to legal risks. Thus these engineers drag down product quality and the productivity of teams. Or, sometimes these individuals hide in the system by moving from one product to the next. Since it is so hard for managers to get rid of incompetent individuals, the managers resort to transferring them to some other team to become some other manager's problem.

      Advice to Senior Management: Stop all cross boarder virtual training All development of growth markets needs to be in person in the growth market. Provide incentive to lower level US engineers to take temporary assignments in the growth markets to develop the skill. Allow US engineers to work on producing excellent products without constantly having to retrain some replacement team.

    • “Good benefits and good company if you like what you do.” Current Senior Hardware Engineer in Raleigh, NC. Pros: IBM still has good benefits most of which are better than other companies. I have great flexibility in whether I want to work in the office or work from home. Cons: If you don't like your current role, it will take quite a while for you to be able to change jobs internally, even though they claim you have a right to do it within 6 months. Advice to Senior Management: Share some of the 3x stock price increase with your employees to show your appreciation.
    • You're just a number in a huge company” Current IT Specialist in New York, NY. Pros: IBM is an elite brand that is recognized everywhere. Pay is decent and culture is mostly laid back. Benefits are good. There is room to grow within the company if you are willing to put in the time. Cons: Offshoring and layoffs are the norm and you will hear people complain about their job and rarely say anything good about the company. Raises are nonexistent. Work is mostly mundane and conference calls fill your schedule. You never really feel like you're treated as a person or employee...only a number that's replaceable. Advice to Senior Management: Put some effort and money into improving morale and not just pleasing the shareholders with the bottom-line.
    • Decent Employer” Current Anonymous Employee. Pros: Good work environment, bleeding edge. Cons: Layoffs common at IBM. They want to ship all the jobs to India. Advice to Senior Management: Value US employees.
    • Greed Rules” Current Senior Consultant in Manchester, England (United Kingdom). Pros: Can often work from home, numerous offices round the country, employees are mostly (now) cynical and fun to be with, not dedicated IBMers Cons: No salary rise for years, company is cheap (mean expenses, most training is on-line rubbish, no funding for meeting team members who all work from home). Software development is getting worse not better as experienced staff leave and/or outsourced to inexperienced people who don't understand the customer requirements. Secrecy. Advice to Senior Management: Open up. If you are making people redundant in another division don't keep is 'secret' so we all hear rumours and wonder if we are next. Scrap PBC and introduce a fair method of rating employees
    • Not working smarter” Current Project Manager in Austin, TX. Pros: Its name impresses certain people. Cons: Does not matter how skilled and productive you are, as you get older they want you out. Advice to Senior Management: Don't throw away your highly skilled senior staff.
    • Good work environment, but recognition is rewarded poorly” Current Staff Software Developer in Markham, ON (Canada). Pros: - Flexible work hours. - Results based, leaves the employee to determine most efficient way to get the job done. - Good starting salary. Cons: - Annual raises are less than satisfactory. - Benefits are mediocre for a large company. - Replaces experienced professionals with inexperienced new graduates. Advice to Senior Management: - Try harder to keep good people around. - Further distinguish the elite from the average worker.
    • “Great company to start off my career” Former GBS Consultant in Singapore (Singapore). Pros: Surrounded by smart people who were also fresh out of college. Great Team Blue training program to get us to be connected across various departments. Cons: Most people left before 3 years was up. Due to slow career advancements opportunities. We end up doing local projects or serving only local customer accounts which defeats the purpose of working in a large MNC like IBM. Advice to Senior Management: Fresh graduates with lots of energy would be most keen to try new things to keep them interested to work harder.
    • Various opportunities to build a career path” Former Java Software Developer in Markham, ON (Canada). Pros: - Entertainment facilities to accommodate and encourage motivation and inspiration. - The IBM Toronto Software Lab provides PS3's, table tennis tables, gym, beach volleyball court, basketball court, scenic location, cafeteria. - Flexible working hours and option to work from home or remotely in any area of the world. Cons: Candidate has to be highly intelligent and highly adaptable to provide good performance in the company
    • Acquired company salary packages takes a deep dive.” Current Client Technical Specialist in Hong Kong (Hong Kong). Pros: Large partner network to sell software through. Existing relationships that can speed up a sales cycle. Cons: Bureaucratic nightmare. Coming from an acquired company with a flat org structure, there's a definite culture shock. Pay packages are also very lopsided and non-negotiable. Advice to Senior Management: – If you're going to have a whole integration team spread the message that "nothing's going to change, it's business as usual, we'll get you to par with your current offer", and then force people to sign contracts that are severely less the original contract, then what's the point?
    • Great place to be - Very professional environment” Current Client Executive in Zürich (Switzerland). Pros: Global Team with highly motivated and skilled people. Very broad product range. Great vision: Smarter Planet Change the world with the help of IT. Cons: – Processes and structures are to (sic) rigid. Admin work has increased over the years. Advice to Senior Management: Give more power to the individuals Reduce processes Introduce more customer centric simpler processes and structures.
    • Working at IBM” Former Global Project Manager in Chicago, IL. Pros: Afforded me ability to worked on some exciting projects. Able to get my PMP certification. Cons: Now they only seem to care about bottom line—not employee. Too big. Employees don't really care anymore as they all think they will be next one to be laid off—in US only as IBM now only hires in other countries—India/Romania, etc. where they can get really cheap labor. Advice to Senior Management: As I told a employee that is still there...get out...it is a toxic environment.
    • Used to be one of the best to work for, but no longer.” Former Program Manager in Poughkeepsie, NY. Pros: IBM is a prestigious company to work for and it has excellent benefits, including up to 4 weeks paid vacation, a 401K, a pension program, healthcare benefits and employee stock purchase plan. It provides you with opportunity to grow your career. Employees have a lot of empowerment. You work in a highly matrixed environment and with people from all over the globe. IBM's strength is its people who generally go above and beyond to service their customers. IBM is a well run, progressive, highly ethical business that seems to always find ways to be successful from quarter to quarter.

      Cons: Although IBM has excellent benefits, over the years they have diminished. Exempt employees are expected to work a minimum of 20% overtime with little or no comp time. Everyone is constantly expected to do more and more and many people are getting burned out. IBM has also been moving a large number of jobs offshore (India, Brazil, Argentina, etc.) and this puts additional burden on those who remain in the US to train and support the offshore resources. IBM has been moving a lot of its IT support to US Global Data Centers in Dubuque, Springfield and Columbia and a lot of the US jobs have moved to those locations. Recently IBM announced that there would be no salary increases this year in the Global Technology Division.

    • Enriching Experience” Former Consultant in Delhi (India) Pros: IBM is a great company to work for. IBM provides a very Good Work environment, good opportunities, global exposure, good policies, work life balance. The work is still around a lot of the big technology deals that IBM has but you still get good consulting opportunities Cons: Too many policies, too bureaucratic, not so good hikes. Sometimes the size of the company gets to you but one has to use that to your advantage. Advice to Senior Management: Better rewards for performance.
  • Alliance for Retired Americans: Friday Alert (PDF). This week's articles include:
  • New York Times: When Your Pension Offers a Choice. By Paul Sullivan. Excerpt: The basic choice itself — between a set amount of money that has to last and a guaranteed payout for however long you live — seemed almost like an experiment designed by a behavioral economist to test our irrationality about money decisions. So I turned first to Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago, to discuss the retirees’ predicament. Mr. Thaler, after all, has spent a lot of time thinking about annuities and retirement savings.

    “One of the mistakes is to think about this as a break-even proposition,” Mr. Thaler said. “How many years do I have to live for this to pay off? That’s not a particularly helpful frame for this problem.”

  • Reuters, courtesy of the New York Times: U.S. Loves Cops and Firefighters-But Not Their Pensions. Excerpt: Pharmacist Michael Nastro is full of admiration for how police responded to a deadly robbery in his suburban New York neighborhood in 2011. A gunman walked into a pharmacy near his town on Long Island, killed four people and fled with a stash of painkillers. Police in the area, which is part of wealthy Suffolk County, best known for the exclusive Hamptons beach towns, boosted patrols and gave advice on what to do if the robber hit again. They caught him three days after the shooting.

    But Nastro, 50, admits he's torn about police officers' pay and retirement benefits. "I'd be lying to you if I said I wasn't conflicted," he said. "I want good police work, but I'm a taxpayer too. There's got to be a middle ground."

  • Huffington Post: AARP Launches Networking, Job Search Site For Unemployed. By Laura Rowley. Excerpt: AARP today announced the launch of Work Reimagined, a social networking site powered by LinkedIn that connects post 50 professionals on the hunt with employers seeking experienced workers, and with their peers.

    Work Reimagined will offer access to openings with the nearly 120 employers "who have taken the Work Reimagined pledge, publicly committing to treat all employees equally regardless of age," according to an AARP press release. They include more than two dozen employers. At its launch, the site listed more than 2,600 openings at AT&T and just two available slots at Dollar General. Other employers listing immediate openings include tech firms such as Google, retailers such as Toys R Us and Lowe's and insurance firms including United HealthCare and New York Life.

  • Wired UK: Jonathan Ive: Apple's goal isn't to make money. By Olivia Solon. Excerpts: Apple's goal is not to make money, but to make good products, said Jonathan Ive, senior vice president of industrial design at Apple, speaking at the British Embassy's Creative Summit.

    "We are really pleased with our revenues but our goal isn't to make money. It sounds a little flippant, but it's the truth. Our goal and what makes us excited is to make great products. If we are successful people will like them and if we are operationally competent, we will make money," he said.

    He explained how, in the 90s, Apple was very close to bankruptcy and that "you learn a lot about vital corporations through non-vital corporations". When Steve Jobs returned to the company in 1997, his focus was not on making money -- "His observation was that the products weren't good enough. His resolve was to make better products." This was a different approach from other attempts to turn the company around, which had focused first and foremost on cost savings and revenue generation.

    "I refute that design is important. Design is a prerequisite. Good design -- innovation -- is really hard," said Ive, explaining how it is possible to be both a craftsperson and a mass manufacturer with discipline and focus. "We say no to a lot of things that we want to do and are intrigued by so that we only work on a manageable amount of products and can invest an incredible amount of care on each of them." ...

    I've closed by reiterating the Apple mantra that "we don't do market research". "It will guarantee mediocrity and will only work out whether you are going to offend anyone." He said it is a designer's responsibility to understand potential opportunities and be familiar and fluent with technologies that could enable the creation of products that fit with those opportunities.

  • MIT's Technology Review: Human Workers, Managed by an Algorithm. Foreign recruits are the newest cogs in the crowdsourcing machine. By Antonio Regalado. Excerpts: Stephanie Hamilton is part of something larger than herself. She's part of a computer program. The 38-year-old resident of Kingston, Jamaica, recently began performing small tasks assigned to her by an algorithm running on a computer in Berkeley, California. That software, developed by a startup called MobileWorks, represents the latest trend in crowdsourcing: organizing foreign workers on a mass scale to do routine jobs that computers aren't yet good at, like checking spreadsheets or reading receipts.

    By assigning such tasks to people in emerging economies, MobileWorks hopes to get good work for low prices. It uses software to closely control the process, increasing accuracy by having multiple workers perform every task. According to company cofounder Anand Kulkarni, the aim is to get the crowd of workers to "behave much more like an automatic resource than like individual and unreliable human beings." ...

    Jessica Mah, inDinero's CEO, says she couldn't easily run her business without a crowd of assistants. "The alternative would be to have high-school students do it ... but there's no redundancy, and there's no built-in workflow management," she says. "The price of having MobileWorks have five people look over a receipt is cheaper than the cost of hiring a high-school student at minimum wage to do the task once."

New on the Alliance@IBM Site
Minimize
  • Job Cut Reports
    • Comment 07/29/12: Boohoohoo- Our team RA'd a new hire that was with us less than 6 months. Just because you are getting new people doesn't mean your team is safe. -GettinHosed-
    • Comment 07/29/12: IBM will do whatever it has to do to make its numbers. We all know this. I will do whatever I have to do to earn a living and support my family. That includes joining the alliance, trying to recruit others to join. working hard for my and IBM's customers so my reputation as a hard working professional is never tainted in the eyes of my customers who are an RA away from possibly being my employers. I would much prefer a union in place at IBM so I can continue to work with the above average people at IBM and be treated fairly in the process. I enjoy my customers as customers because I really do not know what it would be like to work for them instead of with them. I am comfortable with my relationship with them as it is so the union is the absolute best bet for me. If you feel this is a reasonable way of thinking then I hope you will join me in supporting the Alliance. -Exodus2007-
    • Comment 07/30/12: I was part of the March 28 RA. The Pension department said I have 15 yrs as of March since I worked for a subsidiary, but the Health Care Benefits department said I did not have 15 years since I transferred into IBM in August. So I would have had to stay until August to receive the FHA benefit. I have been through may layers of appeals with no success. I had to leave $40K on the table. Don't feel comfortable thinking you have FHA, you may not have it. -maesey1-
    • Comment 08/01/12: -maesey1- Sadly, pension benefits and retiree healthcare benefits are totally different and determined as such. Are you at least 55 years old? You also need to be this age at a minimum with at least 15 years of IBM service to qualify for FHA. Check your earnings history under the pension account from the Netbenefits site. If you have 15 full years of service and are at least 55 years old then you should continue your fight. You are not leaving $40K on the table. The FHA, as has been mentioned in this forum and the IBM employee issues yahoo board has made it clear that the FHA is a NOTIONAL account balance. It is not a real $ account, not like a 401(k) not like a pension, and certainly not like a real retiree medical insurance plan to cover you for the rest of your retired life. Besides IBM can rescind the FHA at any time. They can deny it to you at any time. It is NOT protected or guaranteed by ERISA and/or a union contract. You and thousands others THINK you are entitled to FHA. Sadly, time to THINK TWICE when the time comes to get it. -FutureHellAccounted-
    • Comment 07/31/12: Hearing that the reductions coming are selective in regards to product profitability. For instance Information Management team that did not have the data warehouse appliance like Netezza going to see some loss. Also, IBM is firing senior people only to replace them with younger inexperienced sales execs. For instance a manager in the midwest fired a productive rep with over 8 years with the company and 25+ years in the industry for a Ricoh copier sales person with less than 18 months of sales experience. This poor kid has to cover the most complex accounts in Core with not experience? I feel for her and the customers. -270%-
    • Comment 08/01/12: Someone asked, "I wonder if the power outages in India are affecting IBM's ability to conduct business." Well, there's fewer errors and mistakes -fixer-
    • Comment 08/01/12: CIO just announced two US Executives are being moved temporarily (2 years) to Eastern bloc countries to build competency centers and skill depth. They'll retain their US organizations, so they can directly manage the job transitions. -anonymous-
    • Comment 08/02/12: I can confirm some contractors got a 3% cut in Canada. -whatever-
    • Comment 08/02/12: @-fixer-, There were several outages on w3 over the same time frame of the India power outage. Hence, support not available when power is down in India? -coincidence--
    • Comment 08/06/12: I was RAed this year. I was working as a PM for a major corporation when I got RAed. I told the customer not to worry since IBM would replace me with someone else. The customer objected to any replacement and told IBM Client Executive that they would not continue their contract after I was gone. They even went further and told IBM that they wanted me to continue the work I was doing and would bring me back after my 30 day separation expired. So IBM lost a $400K contract and the customer is paying me $100 per hour which is a lot more that what I was getting paid at IBM. I would always tell the folks who got RAed before me that there is a life after IBM. Well it is my turn and IBM has released me to enjoy it!! -BeenRAed-
    • Comment 08/06/12: -UnixDude- It's coming. The rumor around the Austin campus that is home to POWER/AIX is that the entire site will be just one building by the end of 2015. And from what I heard, this information came openly from VP Dan Frye. They are already shuffling people around to different buildings so they can terminate leases. This plays well with the STG sell off that has been rumored several times. -IBMAustin-
News and Opinion Concerning Health Savings Accounts, Medical Costs and Health Care Reform
Minimize
  • National Public Radio (NPR) Talk of the Nation: One Doc's Prescription For Hassle-Free Healthcare. Description: Dr. Jay Parkinson envisions a future of more efficient, hassle-free healthcare—and it starts online. He says he and his colleagues at the New York City-based healthcare start-up Sherpaa can solve 70 percent of patients' problems via email, eliminating a trip to the doctor's office.
  • Crooks & Liars: Celebration of the UK National Health Service. By Diane Sweet. Excerpt: If you missed the opening ceremony of the Olympics on Friday evening, here's a glimpse. This was seriously mind blowing, a country where the people pay higher taxes for nationalized health care, and they celebrate it. The mere mention of it in the U.S. makes the right-wing recoil in horror and hiss all at once.

    "It’s something that is very dear to people's hearts. If you live here, you will end up there, it does not matter how rich or powerful you are. ... We got hundreds of volunteers from the National Health Service. All the volunteers made a special sacrifice to be with us and to be rehearsed, but these guys are extraordinary.” – Danny Boyle on celebration of the U.K.'s NHS during London Olympics

  • New York Times: Comparing Medicare and Employer Health Insurance. By Ann Carrns. Excerpts: No wonder older people object so strongly to any changes in Medicare. People with traditional Medicare coverage are less likely to skip needed care or encounter problems in getting care due to cost, and are more satisfied with their coverage, than are younger people with employer-sponsored health insurance, a study published online in the journal Health Affairs finds. ...

    Just 8 percent of those with Medicare rated their insurance “fair” or “poor,” compared with 20 percent of those with employer-based insurance. And 13 percent of those with Medicare reported a financial problem due to a medical bill, compared with 27 percent of those with employer insurance. Less than a quarter of Medicare patients reported a problem obtaining access to care due to cost, compared with 37 percent of those with employer insurance.

  • The Tennessean: Health insurance aids employers. By Dan Cornfield. Excerpts: As Tennessee lawmakers argue whether to call for the repeal or implementation of the Affordable Care Act, 900,000 Tennesseans go without health insurance and adequate health care.

    Over three-fourths of uninsured Tennesseans work in the civilian economy, according to a 2010 U.S. Census Bureau survey. Employers and labor unions should not wait around for lawmakers to figure out their political response to the Affordable Care Act, but should extend health insurance benefits to non-insured workers in the state. Extending health insurance to these workers will improve the health and well-being of Tennesseans and increase the competitiveness of many Tennessee workplaces.

    Who are Tennessee’s 900,000 uninsured? Over 90 percent of Tennesseans who lack health insurance are of working age (16-64). The majority of the working-age uninsured are male, white and U.S. citizens, and most work for an employer rather than for themselves, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. ...

    Historically, labor unions have created decent jobs for workers by negotiating for health insurance benefits, beginning with the sickness and death benefits provided by the building trades, railroad unions and other skilled craft unions in the 1800s. On its 50th anniversary in 1964, the Amalgamated Clothing Workers union proclaimed that its pioneering employer-financed health insurance programs “assist the workers by protecting their health and prolonging their lives; they aid the employers by reducing absence from work because of illness.”

    Today, more than 90 percent of unionized, private-sector workers have access to employment-based health insurance, according to a 2011 U.S. Department of Labor survey.

  • AARP: 5 Myths About Canada’s Health Care System. The truth may surprise you about international health care. By Aaron E. Carroll, M.D., M.S. Excerpts: ow does the U.S. health care system stack up against Canada’s? You’ve probably heard allegedly true horror stories about the Canadian system — like 340-day waits for knee replacement surgery, for example. To separate fact from fiction, Aaron E. Carroll, M.D., the director of the Center for Health Policy and Professionalism Research in Indianapolis, identified the top myths about the two health care systems.
    • Myth #1: Canadians are flocking to the United States to get medical care. ...
    • Myth #2: Doctors in Canada are flocking to the United States to practice. ...
    • Myth #3: Canada rations health care; that’s why hip replacements and cataract surgeries happen faster in the United States. ...
    • Myth #4: Canada has long wait times because it has a single-payer system. ...
    • Myth #5: Canada rations health care; the United States doesn’t.
  • Washington Post: Romney praises health care in Israel, where research says ‘strong government influence’ has driven down costs. By Sarah Kliff. Excerpts: Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney had some very kind things to say about the Israeli health care system at a fundraiser there Monday. He praised Israel for spending just 8 percent of its GDP on health care and still remaining a “pretty healthy nation:”
    When our health care costs are completely out of control. Do you realize what health care spending is as a percentage of the GDP in Israel? 8 percent. You spend 8 percent of GDP on health care. And you’re a pretty healthy nation. We spend 18 percent of our GDP on health care. 10 percentage points more. That gap, that 10 percent cost, let me compare that with the size of our military. Our military budget is 4 percent. Our gap with Israel is 10 points of GDP. We have to find ways, not just to provide health care to more people, but to find ways to finally manage our health care costs.

    Romney’s point about Israel’s success in controlling health care costs is spot on: Its health care system has seen health care costs grow much slower than other industrialized nations

    How it has gotten there, however, may not be to the Republican candidate’s liking: Israel regulates its health care system aggressively, requiring all residents to carry insurance and capping revenue for various parts of the country’s health care system.

    Israel created a national health care system in 1995, largely funded through payroll and general tax revenue. The government provides all citizens with health insurance: They get to pick from one of four competing, nonprofit plans. Those insurance plans have to accept all customers—including people with pre-existing conditions—and provide residents with a broad set of government-mandated benefits.

News and Opinion Concerning the "War on the Middle Class"
Minimize "It is a restatement of laissez-faire-let things take their natural course without government interference. If people manage to become prosperous, good. If they starve, or have no place to live, or no money to pay medical bills, they have only themselves to blame; it is not the responsibility of society. We mustn't make people dependent on government- it is bad for them, the argument goes. Better hunger than dependency, better sickness than dependency."

"But dependency on government has never been bad for the rich. The pretense of the laissez-faire people is that only the poor are dependent on government, while the rich take care of themselves. This argument manages to ignore all of modern history, which shows a consistent record of laissez-faire for the poor, but enormous government intervention for the rich." From Economic Justice: The American Class System, from the book Declarations of Independence by Howard Zinn.

  • The Fiscal Times: Offshore Accounts on the Rise and Costing Taxpayers. By Kenneth Thomas. Excerpts: A new report by the Tax Justice Network, "The Price of Offshore Revisited," shows that the amount of wealth held in tax havens has increased enormously since 2004, and confirms what I previously wrote about the huge cost to tax coffers of money hidden offshore.

    The report was authored by the former Chief Economist of McKinsey and Company, James Henry. Its findings advance our understanding of tax havens and demonstrate that typical estimates of wealth inequality are significantly understated.

    The major finding is that offshore financial holdings now come to some $21-32 trillion, compared with the estimate in TJN's 2005 report of $9.5 trillion (this excludes non-financial wealth, such as real estate). James makes a very conservative estimate of how much governments lose in taxes of $189 billion a year, based on earning just 3 percent on this $21 trillion, taxed at 30 percent. ...

    On the inequality of financial wealth, Henry says: "By our estimates, at least a third of all private financial wealth, and nearly half of all offshore wealth, is now owned by world's richest 91,000 people, or just 0.001 percent of the world's population. The next 51 percent of all wealth is owned by the next 8.4 million, another trivial 0.14 percent of the world's population."

  • New York Times op-ed: Mitt Romney’s Financial Mysteries. By Michael J. Graetz. Pressure is mounting for Mitt Romney to release more of his financial records. Mr. Romney has made public only his 2010 tax returns and has said his 2011 documents will be released soon. “That’s all that’s necessary for people to understand something about my finances,” he said recently. He is “simply not enthusiastic,” he also said, about giving the Obama campaign “hundreds or thousands of more pages to pick through, distort and lie about.”

    But it is a good bet that Mr. Romney’s vetters have picked through more than two years of returns of his vice-presidential contenders. And the Senate typically requires more for confirmation to a cabinet or even a subcabinet post. Until Mr. Romney recognizes the right of voters to understand the finances of their leaders, all we are left with is speculation. ...

    After all, the one year’s tax returns that he has released raise doubt about his campaign’s claims that his offshore accounts did not save him one penny of tax. Putting business assets into an individual retirement account invested in a Cayman Islands corporation allows Mr. Romney to avoid the “unrelated business income tax” — a 35 percent levy — on at least some of his I.R.A.’s earnings, a tax that he would have had to pay if his I.R.A. were held directly by a financial institution in the United States. With an I.R.A. account of $20 million to $101 million, the tax savings would be more than a few pennies. ...

    Mr. Romney’s Cayman Islands and Bermuda corporations also probably allowed him to avoid limitations on deductions for investment expenditures that would otherwise apply. So we don’t need any more tax returns to know that Mr. Romney is an Olympic-level athlete at the tax avoidance game. Rich people don’t send their money to Bermuda or the Cayman Islands for the weather. ...

    Moreover, we have no clue whether Mr. Romney paid any gift tax on transfers, now valued at $100 million, to a trust he set up in 1995 for the benefit of his five sons. Until this year, the federal gift tax had a lifetime exemption of $1 million, and it taxed gifts in excess of that amount at rates between 29 and 44 percent. A gift of $100 million to one’s children could, therefore, require paying a tax of as much as $29 million to $44 million.

    But every good tax professional knows that gift tax returns are rarely audited, except after the transferor’s death. And normally the I.R.S. cannot challenge such a return after three years from its filing. But if the values of the gifts were not properly appraised and disclosed on Mr. Romney’s gift tax returns, a challenge may still be possible. If he did not file any gift tax return, he would still be liable for the tax, plus interest and penalties. ...

    To settle these questions, Mr. Romney should release his gift tax returns, or other documents showing how he valued his transfers to his family’s trust and to his I.R.A., and at least three additional years of income tax returns.

    No one should begrudge Mr. Romney or his family the wealth they have earned. But if he has not paid the taxes that apply to transfers of such wealth, this should concern us all. After all, who do you think pays for the shortfall?

  • New York Times oped: A Big Banker’s Belated Change of Heart. By Jeff Madrick. Excerpts: Last week, in a CNBC interview, Sanford I. Weill, the former chairman of Citigroup, said that America should separate investment banking from commercial banking. This separation, of course, was the prime purpose of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, a piece of legislation that Mr. Weill and other bankers had successfully watered down, with Alan Greenspan’s support, before Mr. Weill helped engineer its official demise in 1999. Now, Mr. Weill, the creator of what was once the largest financial conglomerate in the world, suggests that Citigroup and others should be broken up. Banks can no longer “be too big to fail,” he told CNBC. ...

    Traditionally, investment analysis on Wall Street had been fairly well trusted as an independent opinion on which investors could rely. But there was a shift during the speculative boom of the 1990s, when analysts were directly compensated by their firms for promoting the sale of shares and the purchase of bonds for investment banking and loan clients.

    This happened across Wall Street, not just at Citigroup. As one well-known analyst, Ronald Glantz, told Congress in 2001, “Now the job of analysts is to bring in investment banking clients, not provide good investment advice.” In the late 1990s, according to the former Harvard Business School professor D. Quinn Mills, only 1 percent of analysts’ recommendations were to sell a stock. ...

    Observers who have been arguing that banks should be broken up shouldn’t especially cheer Mr. Weill’s conversion to their views. Mr. Weill no longer has anything to lose. And he hasn’t come to terms with the damage the financial giants did on his watch, which would have been a true test of his sincerity. Indeed, if he were still running Citigroup, he would almost certainly be singing a different tune.

  • Smirking Chimp: The Nakedness Of Their Greed. By Richard Eskow. Excerpts: it's truly unbelievable: At no time in modern memory has the privileged class been richer, the middle class more endangered, or the number of people in poverty been so high. And yet the Republican Party, whose leaders are overwhelmingly wealthy themselves, is openly and shamelessly proposing to give more tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires - including heirs and heiresses who have done nothing to earn their riches - while actually raising taxes on millions of poor and middle class people. ...

    Yesterday the Senate voted on a Democratic proposal to extend the Bush-era tax breaks for all income below $250,000 per year. Everybody would get that tax break, even billionaires. Taxes would go up for anything earned above that amount, and for some kinds of investment income. The bill would also preserve a number of tax breaks for middle class and lower-income working people.

    Forty-eight Senators voted against the Democratic bill. Forty-four of them then promptly voted for the Republican proposal, which would keep the Bush tax cut for earnings above $250,000 - a cut which provides greater and greater tax breaks as you climb the earnings scale toward "millionaire" status and eventually ascend to the rarefied atmosphere of the billionaires' club. ...

    The Republicans want to impose these new tax burdens on the struggling middle class while giving an average cut of $160,000 in income and estate tax cuts for households that earn a million dollars or more. And if those households earn a billion or more, the breaks could run into tens of millions annually.

    But tax deductions so a working family can send their kids to college, which is already all but impossible? No can do. Perhaps they feel that parents who want a better life for their kids should "know their place" instead.

  • Smirking Chimp: Tax Vote Shows GOP Well-Aware Of Media Impunity. By Dave Johnson. Excerpts: The American voter's information sources are compromised. Republicans voted to cut taxes for the wealthy and raise taxes for the rest of us because they understand that most of the pubic will not find out what they did. They understand they will not be held accountable. They understand they have media impunity. They understand that they have a disinformation machine at their disposal that very effectively disinforms the public. They understand that the 98% whose taxes would go up if their vote makes its way into law will not be informed by our "news media, while meanwhile they pocket plenty of, uh, "campaign" money from the wealthy few who want those tax cuts. ...

    Much of the public thinks unemployment is worse now than when President Obama took office. They think the stimulus "didn't work." But in fact the economy lost 815,000 jobs in Bush's last month. The stimulus turned that around, and now the economy is gaining jobs. Not enough jobs, but it is gaining jobs, not losing jobs. But the right's disinformation machine blasts out the lie that unemployment is worse, and the country's major media does almost nothing to correct the lie.

    Much of the public thinks that President Obama raised taxes. In fact the stimulus was 1/3 tax cuts, and the Social Security "payroll tax" was cut by 1/3. But the right's disinformation machine blasts out the lie that the President has raised taxes, and the country's major media does almost nothing to correct the lie.

    Much of the public thinks thinks President Obama increased the country';s budget deficits. In fact the last Bush budget left us with a $1.4 trillion deficit. But the right's disinformation machine blasts out the lie that the President caused the deficits, and the country's major media does almost nothing to correct the lie. ...

    Another lie: President Obama said business leaders didn't build their own businesses. The President said business owners did not build their businesses alone, that we all pitched in, that the roads, bridges and other infrastructure that enable our businesses require a cooperative joint effort.

  • Washington Post: Report finds for-profit colleges serve shareholders over students. By Daniel de Vise. Excerpts: As of 2009, the report said, three-quarters of students in for-profit colleges attended institutions owned either by publicly traded companies or private equity firms. It said the schools excelled at recruiting students, but not necessarily at retaining them: More than half of students at for-profit schools who enrolled in the 2008-09 academic year left without a degree, the report found. Half of all non-finishers ended their studies within four months. ...

    “We uncovered two very big problems in for-profit higher education,” Harkin said in a statement. “One, billions of taxpayer dollars are being squandered. And two, many for-profit schools are doing real, lasting harm to the students they enroll.” ...

    But for-profit colleges have failed to support those students, the report states, by prizing recruitment over retention. The colleges studied spent 23 percent of their revenue on marketing and recruiting, the report found, and 17 percent on instruction. ...

    The publicly traded companies that operate for-profit colleges yielded an average profit margin of 20 percent in 2009 and paid an average $7.3 million to their chief executives, the report found.

    The companies are successful largely because they charge high tuition. Associate-degree programs at for-profit colleges cost at least four times as much as comparable programs at public community colleges, $34,988 vs. $8,313, the report found. Internal company documents showed tuition hikes were enacted “to satisfy company profit goals,” rather than to cover increased costs of educating students, the report states.

  • Huffington Post: The CEO Plan to Steal Your Social Security and Medicare. By Dean Baker. Excerpts: Many people are following the presidential election closely with the idea that the outcome will have a major impact on national policy. However, according to Steven Pearlstein, a veteran Washington Post columnist and reporter, it may not matter who wins the election. In a column last week, Pearlstein told readers that the top executives of some of the country's largest companies are getting together to craft a budget package that they will try to push through Congress and get the president to sign.

    While Pearlstein clearly sees these backroom meetings of corporate chieftains in positive terms (he refers to them as "grown-ups" who have been noticeably absent from the conversation about the budget), the rest of us might view this plotting a bit differently. As Pearlstein openly acknowledges, this corporate coup is an end-run around the electorate. As corrupt as the political process may have become, at least we will get a vote in the election. Pearlstein's plotters are not inviting the rest of us into the conversation.

    Many of the same folks who brought the economy to ruin just a few years ago are now going to come up with a plan that is supposed to set the budget and the economy on a forward path. At the center of their proposal are big cuts in Social Security and Medicare. ...

    The other way we are paying for this corporate effort to cut our Social Security and Medicare is by virtue of the fact that we allow the CEOs to pay for their campaign with pre-tax dollars. If most of want to give $100 to a political candidate or political cause we have to first pay taxes on our income and then make the campaign contribution out of what we have left.

    However, if you are a CEO who wants to cut Social Security and Medicare, the Supreme Court says you can make your contributions with pre-tax dollars, in effect deducting this contribution as if you were giving money to charity. According to Pearlstein, the CEOs "charitable" contribution for cutting Social Security and Medicare will be on the order of $278 million.

    For most of us, that sum would be real money, but not for CEOs who control trillions of dollars. And, with the rest of us subsidizing through our tax dollars this effort to cut our Social Security and Medicare, how can the CEOs not take up Pearlstein's call?

  • Smirking Chimp: Beating Back the CEO Attack on Social Security and Medicare. By Dean Baker. Excerpts: The CEOs seeking to cut back or dismantle Social Security and Medicare can probably outspend the defenders of these programs 10 to 1. However, there is still the simple fact that the voters overwhelmingly support these programs.

    This is a result reported by every poll every conducted on these issues. Both Social Security and Medicare enjoy extremely high approval ratings across the political spectrum. There is almost nothing that unites the public as much as support for these programs. Well over 70 percent of Republicans, Democrats and Independents indicate strong support for Social Security and Medicare.

    The same holds by ideology. There is little difference between people who call themselves liberals and conservatives, both groups overwhelmingly support Social Security and Medicare and are opposed to cuts in these programs. Even self-described supporters of the Tea Party overwhelmingly support Social Security and Medicare. ...

    People should also be aware that politicians are true masters of evasion on these questions. A response like, "I support Social Security and Medicare," should be taken to mean that they are prepared to support cuts for these programs. All of the people running for office are smart enough to know how to say that they oppose the cuts being put on the table, and they undoubtedly would say that they oppose the cuts, if it is true.

    Similarly, a statement like, "I oppose the privatization of Social Security and Medicare" should also be taken to mean that they are prepared to support cuts to these programs. Again, they are not being asked about privatization, it's not immediately on the table, why would they give an answer about privatization except to avoid admitting their support for cuts? ...

    The whole effort here must be focused on smoking out politicians on where they stand on cuts to Social Security and Medicare. The CEOs want to do this behind closed doors because they know that politicians who have to answer to their constituencies will never be able to get away with these cuts. The key is to force the debate into the sunlight.

  • In These Times: The War on Old Folks. By Susan J. Douglas. Excerpts: While the Republican War on Women has gained national attention, there has been less outrage over the Republican War on Older Americans. But the battles are everywhere. State after state is going after pension funds. Here in Michigan, for example, one of the first things Republican Gov. Rick Snyder did was to impose new and higher taxes on retirement income and public pensions. Making matters worse, our state’s long recession forced many people in their 50s to take early retirement as employers downsized. When you retire early, your benefits are lower than if you wait until you’re 65. So now, a larger percentage of smaller retirement eggs will be subject to income tax. Why? To make up for cuts in the state’s business taxes.

    Beyond Michigan, the AFL-CIO finds that older workers who lose their jobs have the highest rate of long-term unemployment, which in turn means significantly reduced retirement income. Plus, they often have to tap into what savings they have to get by.

    So how are compassionate conservatives at the national level responding to the needs of aging Americans? Congressman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) proposed budget is a full-out, concerted assault on old folks. According to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), he would cut Medicaid by $1 trillion over the next decade and convert it into a block grant to the states, which would result in deep cuts to vital services for seniors. Medicaid, according to SEIU, “is the nation’s main source of payment for long-term care, covering a million nursing home residents and paying for 41 percent of all long-term care expenditures in the country.” Clearly, those folks will be much more comfy living in a refrigerator box under an overpass.

    Also, under Ryan’s plan, starting in 2022, Medicare would no longer exist. Instead, people currently in their early 50s would, when they retire, get a voucher to purchase private health insurance, thus transferring control of Medicare to the health insurance industry. Citing a Congressional Budget Office estimate, SEIU predicts that under this plan 20 million retirees won’t have Medicare when they retire, and that such a voucher program will double healthcare costs for seniors. It also notes that Ryan’s plan proposes to “cut future Social Security benefits for everyone who is earning more than $22,000 a year right now.”

  • Wall Street Journal's SmartMoney: Grandma's New Financial Problem: College Debt. Tens of thousands of retirees have fallen behind on student loans--and the feds are coming after their Social Security benefits. By Annamaria Andriotis. Excerpts: It's no secret that falling behind on student loan payments can squash a borrower's hopes of building savings, buying a home or even finding work. Now, thousands of retirees are learning that defaulting on student-debt can threaten something that used to be untouchable: their Social Security benefits.

    According to government data, compiled by the Treasury Department at the request of SmartMoney.com, the federal government is withholding money from a rapidly growing number of Social Security recipients who have fallen behind on federal student loans. From January through August 6, the government reduced the size of roughly 115,000 retirees' Social Security checks on those grounds. That's nearly double the pace of the department's enforcement in 2011; it's up from around 60,000 cases in all of 2007 and just 6 cases in 2000. ...

    Many of these retirees aren't even in hock for their own educations. Consumer advocates say that in the majority of the cases they've seen, the borrowers went into debt later in life to help defray education costs for their children or other dependents. Harold Grodberg, an elder law attorney in Bayonne, N.J., says he's worked with at least six clients in the past two years whose problems started with loans they signed up for to help pay for their grandchildren's tuition. Other attorneys say they're working with older borrowers who had signed up for the federal PLUS loan -- a loan for parents of undergraduates -- to cover tuition costs. Other retirees took out federal loans when they returned to college in midlife, and a few are carrying debt from their own undergraduate or graduate-school years. (No statistics track exactly how many of the defaulting loans fall into which category.) ...

    Unlike other consumer debts, student loans typically can't be wiped out in bankruptcy. And changes in the law over the last couple of decades have given Uncle Sam more power to pursue defaulters, says William Brewer, president of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 empowered the federal government to offset Social Security payments of defaulted student-loan borrowers. An earlier law, the Higher Education Technical Amendments Act, essentially removed any time limits on the government's ability to collect from the defaulters. The Supreme Court upheld both provisions in a 2005 ruling.

  • Washington Post: Special interests win in Senate panel’s attempt at tax reform. By Lori Montgomery. Excerpts: It was supposed to be a first step toward tax reform. But as lawmakers tackled a list of 75 special-interest tax breaks, the special interests repeatedly won.

    An accelerated write-off for owners of NASCAR tracks: That has to stay.

    An economic development credit for a StarKist tuna cannery in American Samoa: That stays, too.

    A rum-tax rebate for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands worth millions of dollars a year to one of the world’s largest distillers: Check.

    A $2,500 credit for electric motorcycles and other low-speed vehicles: That stays. But “in the spirit of tax reform,” its sponsor, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said he agreed that electric golf carts would no longer be eligible. ...

    The provisions are instead regularly renewed for a year or two “in the dark of night,” as Hatch put it, often as an amendment to must-pass bills. In 2008, for example, the Senate tacked them onto the Troubled Assets Relief Program bank-bailout legislation.

  • Los Angeles Times: Romneys, caught in housing bust, got tax cut in La Jolla. Reassessment of their $12-million home, one of many reductions in San Diego County, has saved $109,000 over four years. By Robin Abcarian. Excerpts: Mitt and Ann Romney were easily able to afford a $12-million La Jolla home. But that didn't insulate them from the winds buffeting the real estate market in the months following their purchase in 2008.

    After paying cash for the Mediterranean-style house with 61 feet of beach frontage, they asked San Diego County for dramatic property tax relief.

    Romney, the presumptive GOP nominee for president whose wealth is estimated at $250 million, has rejected calls from Democrats and Republicans to release his income tax returns prior to 2010. But San Diego County assessor records shed light on one sliver of the couple's personal taxes during that time: a months-long effort to reduce their annual property tax bill.

    Initially, the Romneys asked that their 2009 assessment, $12.24 million, be reduced to $6.8 million, maintaining that their home had lost about 45% of its value in the first seven months they owned it.

    Thirteen months later, after hiring an attorney to guide them, the Romneys filed an amended appeal, contending the home had suffered a less-dramatic fall of 27.3%, to $8.9 million.

    They also filed an appeal for the 2010 tax year, claiming the house had dropped further, to $7.5 million, 38.7% less than the home's assessed value. ...

    Referring to their initial claim, Peterson said he did not know how the Romneys determined that their house value had fallen so dramatically, but he thought they may have been reacting to dismal news reports. In any case, he said, they were not required to file documentation at the beginning.

  • Bloomberg: Romney Persona Non Grata In Italy For Bain’s Deal Skirting Taxes. By Jesse Drucker, Elisa Martinuzzi and Lorenzo Totaro. Excerpts: Mitt Romney skipped Italy on his swing through Europe. That was probably prudent.

    That’s because Bain Capital, under Romney as chief executive officer, made about $1 billion in a leveraged buyout 12 years ago that remains controversial in Italy to this day. Bain was part of a group that bought a telephone-directory company from the Italian government and then sold it about two years later, at the peak of the technology bubble, for about 25 times what it paid.

    Bain funneled profits through subsidiaries in Luxembourg, a common corporate strategy for avoiding income taxes in other European countries, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg News. The buyer, Italy’s biggest telephone company, now has a total market value less than what it paid Bain and other investors for the directory business.

    In Italy, the deals have spurred at least three books, separate legal and regulatory probes and newspaper columns alleging investors made a fortune at the expense of Italian taxpayers. Boston-based Bain wasn’t a subject of the inquiries, which didn’t result in any charges.

    The sale of the government’s directory business is “a dark chapter in the country’s privatization history, one that has hurt Italians deeply,” said Bernardo Bortolotti, an economics professor at Turin University who advised the Italian Treasury on asset sales from 2002 through 2005. “It was a mistake from the start, damaged by a lack of transparency and the use of offshore funds.” ...

    Romney himself probably earned more than $50 million, and possibly as much as $60 million from the Italian directory sale of Seat Pagine Gialle SpA, according to a person familiar with the matter. The deal turned into one of the biggest windfalls of his tenure. ...

    As Bain’s CEO from 1984 to 2001, Romney was personally involved in the deal at various points, including the initial decision to invest. He attended at least one meeting about it in Boston, according to a participant. When Bain sold the directory business in 2000, Romney, while still holding the title of CEO, was in charge of preparations for the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. Romney has contended that he gave up management control of Bain in February 1999 to run the games.

    “Mitt Romney and Bain played the role of successful financial speculators at the peril of the Italian government and the small stock-market investors who were burned by the sharp decline in Seat (PG) shares,” said Giovanni Pons, a journalist for la Repubblica and co-author of “L’Affare Telecom” (2002), which recounts details of the Bain deal.

  • New York Times editorial: Business Fears the Fiscal Cliff. Excerpts: As Nelson Schwartz reported in The Times on Monday, a number of manufacturers say they are canceling plans for investing and hiring, in part, because they fear that some $100 billion in budget cuts will take effect in 2013. In all, the law currently calls for $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts over 10 years, starting Jan. 1, divided between nondefense programs and defense projects.

    Republican lawmakers demanded the cuts last year as part of their brinkmanship over the debt ceiling, and business lobbies have generally supported slashing the deficit. But now that the cuts are imminent, corporate executives seem to have realized that the last thing the economy needs is a large budget cut across the board.

    They’re right about that. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the combined impact of the automatic spending cuts plus the scheduled expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts — the so-called fiscal cliff — would cause the economy to contract in the first half of 2013. Some business leaders seem to think the solution is for Congress to act as soon as possible to avert the spending cuts and to extend all of the tax cuts. That would avoid an economic downturn next year, but it would also mean no progress toward long-term deficit reduction.

    The best approach is to delay the blow of lower federal spending, thus shielding businesses from a sudden drop in support, and, at the same time, temporarily extend the Bush-era tax cuts for most Americans and let them expire for those making more than $250,000 a year, as President Obama has proposed. That would raise revenue and be a credible step toward long-term deficit reduction, without harming the recovery, because high-end tax increases do not cut deeply into consumer spending. ...

    That is crucial because higher taxes for top earners is necessary for the nation to begin to raise the revenue it needs. And until the rich pay more, there will never be a national consensus for tax increases on middle-income Americans, which will eventually be needed to further curb long-term deficits.

If you hire good people and treat them well, they will try to do a good job. They will stimulate one another by their vigor and example. They will set a fast pace for themselves. Then if they are well led and occasionally inspired, if they understand what the company is trying to do and know they will share in its sucess, they will contribute in a major way. The customer will get the superior service he is looking for. The result is profit to customers, employees, and to stcckholders. —Thomas J. Watson, Jr., from A Business and Its Beliefs: The Ideas That Helped Build IBM.

This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.