But, maybe there is another reason. With the stock price up from the 70's last year to $114 today. The shareholders? The Executives? Institutions investing in IBM for IRA, 401K, 403B, 457 accounts? Well all the above.
The Executives stand out as benefiting the most with Stock Options that are expiring June 30, 2008 awarded June 30, 1998. As they say, "Greed is good". So there might be a "sell off bubble" before June 30, 2008. You will not see the individual sell of Louis V Gerstner Jr of his 20,000,000 shares as he is no longer a VP or director. His strike price along with the other 34 Stock Option award receivers is about $53 so if the price, at the time of sale is $114 as of today, Gerstner will glean $61 a share times 20,000,000 or $1,220,000,000 in his bank account.
After giving this chart to a reporter at the IBM stockholder meeting a few years ago, the information disappeared from the cbsmarketwatch.com website. You can probably find these stock option awards in the archive filings at the SEC however.
In the following chart, I visited www.cbsmarketwatch.com and looked at each person listed that received stock Options on June 30,1998. The day Gerstner negotiated his outrageous contract and stock options. So these assumptions are made, we know that these folks sold shares, but lets assume, they did not, are good employees like me, and held their shares and are going to cash them in today. All of them. Now when they do, we will assume, that all the money is taken out of the company, at the present share price of $114, Feb 27, 2008.
The Options, June 30, 1998 were issued with an exercise price of $106, there was a split in June 1999 of 2 for 1 share, the amount of stock would double and the exercise price would halve to $53 a share. But, did you know, that Gerstner had the power to change the exercise price from what the shareholders approved in 1998? The $53 stock option can be turned in, Lou mentions this on page 99 of his "Elephant" book as distasteful. You can see this as Lou bought a lot of shares at $13 and so did many of these "35 people" and turned around and sold the same $13 share the next day for $115.
Stock Options Awarded June 30, 1998 to "35" People:
|Name||Title||Stock Options Awarded in 1998||Stock Options Following June, 1999 2 for 1 Split||Value of Stock if Sold on Feb 27, 2008|
|Beitzel, George (affiliated)||VP||2,132||4,264||$486,096|
|Gerstner, Louis V||COB||10,713,960||21,427,920||$2,442,782,800|
|Metz, Frank||Officer, Director||14,753||29,506||$3,363,684|
|Thompson, John M||Officer, Director||80,213||160,426||$18,288,564|
Three Billion, four-hundred fifteen million, seven hundred eighty two thousand, dollars divided up somewhat unevenly for "35" people, granted on June 30, 1998 and if sold at a share price for $114, June 30, 2008, in this example. No matter how you cut it, it is $3.4 Billion that is available to be removed from IBM assets and put in the bank accounts of "35" people.
I considered taking even more radical steps to increase IBM's commitment to its employees. Those at the top were doing fantastically well on stock options-despite the fact that Williams (Al Williams, then IBM President) and I stopped taking options in 1958, after Williams said, "We don't want to look like pigs." While IBM's workers were making good money, they couldn't look forward to the rich capital gains that executives with options had. I asked myself, "How much more am I worth to IBM than that guy down at the bottom of the pay scale? Twice as much? Sure. Ten times as much? Maybe. Twenty times as much? Probably not."
Pg 311, Father, Son & Co.: My Life at IBM and Beyond, by Thomas J. Watson Jr.
These folks are way beyond pigs...
I've been a good performing employee in the company for almost 34 years. Mostly 1's and 2's.
In the last year, however, I have lost faith in IBM and it's management. They have also lost faith in me as well. For the first time their business models don't make sense to me as well as to many of my colleagues. I realize it's time to go and believe me, I hope the best for those still working in the company but I think it'll be a problem to work there at least in the United States.
In any case, I am very lucky and can retire, so I am planning to advise my management that I will retire on June 30. This is almost 120 days away.
So the question is: If I call up the ESC, and give them the date and I hear it is then "cast in concrete", will I be able to move it up in the event of a major change in the retirement plan? Although the chances are remote, there could be for example a pension change announced let's say on April 1 just after I agreed to retire "cast in concrete" on June 30. Frankly, I don't trust (never have) the management of this company.
Is there ERISA protection for those who decide to formally have a date to retire beyond the normal 90 days or should I just wait until March 30? I know this is a small deal compared to what many thousands have suffered here in the last decade.
I also plan not to sign anything as I go out the door, no HR sponsored "remembrance book", etc. I have 2 patents and a half dozen more in application status, but I don't agree with their new confidentiality agreement "reminder". I'll just leave my badge and AMEX card on someone's desk and go quietly out the door to a new career, whatever it may be. Scary, but it's can't be worse than staying inside this mess that some called the "blue pig"!
In parallel with this, your manager has to work with HR on your exit paperwork (i.e. your resignation from IBM).
If IBM should announce something in the next few months, you can always change your retirement date. ERISA protects your vested benefits, so there is little reason to think that something would happen between now and June 30 that would force you to rush out the door. You are already retirement-eligible, your pension is already frozen and you aren't earning anything more, and IBM can't take away what you have already earned.
One thing to think about as far as the date goes... if you retire on June 30, I don't believe you will receive any variable pay for 2008. But if you retire on July 31, you will receive a pro-rated amount. It's your choice as to whether you think it is worth it to hang around for an extra month.
Be sure to use your floating holidays before you use any vacation days. And keep track of how many earned-but-unused vacation days you still have as of your retirement date, as IBM will pay you for those.
As you age, the conversion factor that is used to calculate your monthly pension benefit decreases, causing your pension amount to increase slightly for each additional month you postpone starting your pension.
The lump sum works differently. The lump sum is based on the age-65 value of your pension in 1999, when the cash balance plan was implemented. To calculate the lump sum value, a long term interest rate is used. This used to be the rate on 30-year bonds, but when the Pension Protection Act was signed into law in 2006, it allowed companies to switch to using an interest rate based on high quality corporate bonds, which is generally higher than the 30-year bond rate. This causes the value of the lump sum to decrease. The phase over to the corporate bond rate is being implemented gradually from 2008 to 2012, and you can expect the lump sum value to decrease over that time.
In addition, the pension protection act also switches to new mortality tables, which also have an effect on the lump sums. Note that the change in interest rates and mortality tables does NOT change your monthly annuity amount. They only affect the lump sum amount.
Here is a recent article on this: http://www.kiplinger.com/magazine/archives/2008/03/lump-sum-payout-vs-distribution.html
It is my understanding that IBM has been updating the interest rates only once per year, at the end of the year. I'm not sure if this has changed or not, but it might be that it has. Finally, as has been mentioned before, the lump sum is often a poor deal for employees who are not close to age 65 and have a normal life expectancy, as it gives up the early retirement subsidy which can be quite valuable.
Also, it may be to your benefit if your salary is cut 15% before you leave. The summary plan description indicates that if your salary is cut more than 10%, you are eligible for a severance package.
In addition, you are not required to give advance notice of your retirement, it is done as a courtesy to IBM for planning. At least 45 days has to elapse before a 1st day of a month for you to receive your pension, although you will receive retroactive pay. As an example, I told HR on January 15th that I'm retiring on 2/29, but I will not be paid until April 1, not my first retirement day on March 1st. I will receive retroactive pay for March on April 1st, in addition to my April payment, because they want the signed paperwork with your payment choices at least 45 days before your first check. Good luck with your decision.
After 33 years of 1 and 2 appraisals and doing what I thought was the right thing, I was not very surprised to get my first "3" in 33 years but I was surprised to be threatened with getting managed out of the business. In the past, I'd search out another job and transform myself once again, but the "new IBM" is not about creating employees with great broad expertise, it's about using up people in a narrow job and getting rid of them once they get tired, sick, obsolete or irrelevant. You can't grow technically or intellectually here anymore. It's also about adulation of management, much like hollywood stars and politics. These guys really think they are infallible gods as they reach the VP levels.
During last year, another division requested my well publicized and very specialized expertise in a particular industry and set of technologies. When asked to help, I immediately did so (with management approval) went out of my territory and closed some more business for them. In 2008 they asked for more help and when my management refused they just escalated and blew them away. It turns out they now hold that against me. At least I'll get canned for doing the right thing! One colleague said "You are committing career suicide. Go ahead and enjoy it, you have nothing to worry and you'll do better outside of IBM!" I've agreed to work as a subcontractor for the other division if I get canned out of IBM.
Interesting point on the 15% cut triggering a severance package. Although I'm not involved (I was an IT Networking Architect for at least 10 years in IGS and now an SSL in IGS GTS sales) I've passed this tidbit to some of my old delivery friends and at least one has acted on that tip.
I've disclosed my decision to a couple of friends and have been pleasantly shocked at their reactions. More than one suggested that I just sit on my ass and encourage management to give me the "3" package of 13 weeks pay and CORBA which will save me money over the FHA theft victim rates for a year. One potential new employer and friend even said "Go for it! Let them fire you! It doesn't hurt a bit - it may even make your resume look better - and you can take some more money from the bastards as you go out the door!".
Another good friend, and well known past poster (by his ID) here, just said "Well I'm happy you have decided to wean yourself out of that meagerly paycheck. Now we have to work on weaning the IBM thinking out of you so you can be successful out there!". I've received 3 unsolicited job offers and calls to interview at HP, Cisco and an IBM Business Partner.
I'm not taking the lump sum because actuarially it is essentially another attempt of theft from management and my health seems good. Here's my steps: 1) I've decided to not formally announce my retirement to my management until the last minute, maybe 30 days to 2 weeks out. I don't hate them, I just can't understand the business model they are operating. I really think they are powerless to do much anyway. 2) I am requesting a pension estimate from the ESC this week. 3) I'll clean up my admin stuff and making sure I'm ready to leave at a moment's notice in case I'm lucky and get a severance package. 4) I'll take all of my holidays ASAP. 5) Since I'm mobile, I have no worries about an office, but I think I'll stock up on office supplies.
Thanks for the help, folks.
"It's all well and good for [Bernanke] to say there's no inflation, but that's just not the case for the supermarket shopper or the average person filling their gas tank," says Arthur Hogan, an analyst with Jefferies and Co., an investment bank. Hogan believes the Fed is more concerned with the dangers of an economic slowdown than inflation. ...
But lofty prices don't just loom in the grocery aisle and at the gas pump. Look closely and there are pockets of inflation across many sectors of the economy. ...
Then there's the real killer: health insurance. Since 2001, insurance premiums have jumped 78% for family coverage, far outpacing inflation, according to research by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based health care policy research foundation.
One way is to offer superior customer service, the better to compete for the fewer number of dollars out there, and set yourself up with loyal customers for the inevitable economic rebound. A new report finds a lot of companies like Wal Mart and Home Depot seem to have a different plan. ...
Cutting back on service is an easy way to save a buck when things slow down, but it's also short-sighted. Gruca is putting the finishing touches on a follow-up report that measures a firm's willingness to invest in service and spruced up stores against long term profitability growth. He doesn't have final numbers yet, but he says the preliminary results show a strong link.
Here's the quandary: If you claim benefits at 62, you can retire while you're young enough to enjoy it, but you'll receive reduced benefits for the rest of your life. By contrast, waiting to file until at least full retirement age (66 for boomers who turn 62 this year) will increase your monthly payments, reducing the risk that you'll run out of money in your old age. For many boomers, though, that means working longer — a hard pill to swallow if you hate your job and want to spend more time with your grandchildren.
What most retirees don't realize is that they can change their minds. Under the Social Security Act, individuals who receive early-retirement benefits from Social Security can withdraw their application, repay the benefits they've received and refile for higher benefits at a later date, says Mary Jane Yarrington, senior policy analyst for the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.
When we want to hire lots of software engineers, there is a shortage in North America—a pretty significant shortage,” Gates said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We have this tough problem: If you can’t get the engineers, then you have to have those other jobs be [relocated to] where the engineers are.”
30 years and a raise every year? Unheard of in my project !!!!! GDP every year but nobody has gotten a raise every year in a long, long time. The best in the area average about every other year for the past 6 years. The "below best" are starting to starve. Some even cutting into their 401Ks to make ends meet.
It would appear in my area that the death spiral is out of control. Management screwed too many people and morale went to hell. The carrot no longer means anything and it shows in the work. Clients hit the pavement and the grunts could care less. You can only be beat up so many times. Now PBC's will drop further, moral will drop further, clients will drop. Soon it will just the first line and second line wondering what happened.
Here's my nominee: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., the government agency that protects the pensions of 44 million workers in case their employers can't (or won't) pay promised benefits, has announced that to avoid going bust it will double the percentage of its portfolio -- to 45% -- that it puts into stocks. An additional 10% will go into alternative investments, including hedge funds.
In other words, facing a $14 billion deficit and even larger projected shortfalls, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., or PBGC, decided not to save (by raising premiums) or to live within its means (by cutting benefits) but to gamble in the financial markets by taking on more risk. The PBGC was so proud of its new strategy that it announced it on Presidents Day, when the U.S. financial markets were closed and almost no one was paying attention.
So why is this so scary? Because as a result of 10 years of booms and busts -- the Asian currency crisis, the Long Term Capital Management hedge fund disaster, the tech stock bear market of 2000-02, the housing smash-up, the debt market debacle -- I've increasingly come to believe that those of us who play by the rules (work hard, live within our paychecks, save) are chumps. The way to get ahead is to gamble big and then, if you lose, find someone to cover your losses.
Buckley loved debate. Unlike today's cowardly conservatives, he debated the best minds he could entice on to a stage. He never used his opponents as props or punch lines for fixed fights. He liked them. Loving his own ideas, not just hating theirs, left room for liking them. ...
To get out of Iraq or into a new health care system will require some hard fighting, but also some hard thinking and most of all reasoned arguments to persuade, if not the opposition, certainly the public. If you want to see how far we are from having that kind of debate, watch an old episode of Firing Line and then watch a random hour of live cable television. That's how far.
Bill Buckley raised an army against a liberal establishment. Like Barry Goldwater, he often dissented in later years from a conservative establishment he helped create. The political debate Buckley launched is over, many of its old categories defunct. To shape a new debate we'll need at least a few people with the intellect, humanity, civility and great good humor of Bill Buckley. I hope we find them.
“You’re used to making $17 an hour with benefits, and now you have to take any job for $8 an hour,” Ms. Flennaugh says. On a recent afternoon, she sat in front of a computer terminal at an employment center in a gritty part of town, scrolling dejectedly through online job listings while sending another batch of applications into the ether. “I’ve literally sat and cried, but my friends with double degrees are doing worse,” she says. “It’s the economy. It’s really bad.” ...
Across the nation, the labor market has been deteriorating. Many companies, long reluctant to add workers, are hunkered down and waiting for improved prospects, engaged in what Ed McKelvey, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs, calls “a hiring strike.” Americans with jobs are taking cuts to their work hours; those without jobs are staying out of work longer, or accepting positions that pay far less than they earned previously. ...
Indeed, the increasingly anemic job market comes on the heels of six years of economic expansion that delivered robust corporate profits but scant job growth. The last recession, in 2001, was followed by a so-called jobless recovery. As the economy resumed growing, payrolls continued to shrink.
Michigan is not alone. Across the country, state and local government agencies, big nonprofit organizations and major corporations are rushing to do the same. One result is that the Medicare trust fund is evaporating even faster than expected. At the heart of what critics say is a major cost-shifting maneuver is a program called Medicare Advantage, which pays private insurers a bonus to take over Medicare coverage for seniors.
The payments to the private insurers average more per senior than the cost of care with regular Medicare. The bonus payments enable insurers to offer features that seniors in regular Medicare don't get.
Individual policies are portable, so workers don't have to worry about losing coverage if they change jobs. Plus, employees keep the funds in their HSAs, he says. Critics say workers with health problems may end up paying very high premiums, face exclusions for existing medical conditions, or wind up without insurance in the state-regulated individual market -- challenges not faced in group plans. In addition, when adopting novel ways of providing benefits, employers need to be mindful that they comply with state and federal laws. ...
Karen Politz, a research professor at Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute, is one of the skeptics. Some 30 states have high-risk pools, but the premiums can be as much as double the usual rate. And some, such as in Florida, are closed to new enrollment because of lack of funding. Fewer than 200,000 Americans are covered through high-risk pools. As a coverage option, says Ms. Politz, "It's a fig leaf."
Ms. Coons, a 23-year-old waitress who rents a room and rarely eats out, said she could probably afford a high-deductible policy if she gave up her gym membership and spent less on her amateur photography. But she chooses instead to gamble against the odds of confronting a bankrupting catastrophe.
She worried that she might not be able to get health insurance, or even a job, if a genetic predisposition showed up in her medical records, especially since treatment for the condition, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, could cost over $100,000 a year. Instead, Ms. Grove sought out a service that sent a test kit to her home and returned the results directly to her.
Nor did she tell her doctor when the test revealed that she was virtually certain to get it. Knowing that she could sustain permanent lung damage without immediate treatment for her bouts of pneumonia, she made sure to visit her clinic at the first sign of infection
But then came the day when the nurse who listened to her lungs decided she just had a cold. Ms. Grove begged for a chest X-ray. The nurse did not think it was necessary. “It was just an ongoing battle with myself,” recalled Ms. Grove, of Woodbury, Minn. “Should I tell them now or wait till I’m sicker?”
The first, much-anticipated benefits of personalized medicine are being lost or diluted for many Americans who are too afraid that genetic information may be used against them to take advantage of its growing availability. In some cases, doctors say, patients who could make more informed health care decisions if they learned whether they had inherited an elevated risk of diseases like breast and colon cancer refuse to do so because of the potentially dire economic consequences.
Andrew Menter, founder of the Highland Campus Health Group, a company that bills and collects third-party insurance for college health centers, estimated that only 2 percent to 3 percent of centers nationwide are in-network providers with the large insurance carriers.
Campus health centers traditionally have been financed through tuition, general fees or specific health fees, allowing the same access for all students. More recently, a fee-for-service approach has become increasingly common. As a result, parents who are already buying their own insurance may have to pay substantial health fees and out-of-pocket costs for lab tests and X-rays.
Students could pay for health services themselves and then file for reimbursement from their insurance companies, but Mr. Menter said only about one in eight claims is reimbursed for out-of-network providers. And when they are paid, he said, it is sometimes for a fraction of the charge.
The 2003 Medicare prescription drug law requires that no more than 45 percent of total Medicare expenditures be paid for by general revenues, drawn mostly from the progressive income tax. (The other main funding sources are payroll taxes and beneficiary payments.)That restriction means that Congress can’t bolster Medicare with money generated by closing corporate tax loopholes or letting the president’s tax cuts for the wealthy expire. Those sensible steps would increase the amount of income tax supporting the program — pushing it over the arbitrary 45 percent cap. Instead, as health care costs rise and the population ages, the program will have to reduce services and reimbursements or find additional revenues elsewhere. ...
The administration has made no effort to reduce the lavish and unjustified subsidies granted to the private health plans that participate in Medicare. Eliminating them could save Medicare far more general revenue money than reducing drug-program subsidies would. Medicare needs to be reformed, but that debate should not be artificially constrained. Congress needs to focus on ways to restrain the relentless rise in health care costs that is bedeviling all health insurers, including Medicare. Congress and the administration need to be able to consider all possible sources of revenue for Medicare — on their own sound and equitable merits.
In America, a lucky employee with gold-plated employer-based coverage may well get access to A-level care (though that level of coverage becoming rarer by the month, even among the professional classes). On the other hand, about 50 million under-insured Americans are barely scraping by with C or D-level care; and the nearly 50 million with no insurance at all get next to no care whatsoever. Worst of all: 18,000 Americans die every year due to lack of access to healthcare. That’s one every 30 minutes, around the clock, every day of the year — the equivalent death toll of six 9/11s every single year that passes.
In Canada, everybody gets at least B-level care, pretty consistently across the board — and, on occasion, quite a bit better than that. You might not like those odds if you’re one of the shrinking handful of Americans who’s used to A-level care; but if that’s not you, you’d be getting a much better deal in Canada.
The private sector has had 20 years to prove that it could deliver low-cost, quality care using those vaunted business-style efficiencies; and it has failed us utterly and completely. This fact should be the ultimate nail in the coffin of the old conservative canard that “the free market always does it better.” If that was true, privatizing health care would have been the shining example that proved it once and for all. Instead, all we got was a colossally expensive national disaster that’s denying full coverage to a third of the country — and putting our health, competitiveness, financial and social capital, and national security at risk in the process. It’s also devastating the aspirations of our entire middle class, which is being hollowed out by our current health policies.
A famous Hebrew prophet once advised his followers to take the log out of their own eyes before trying to remove the splinter from someone else’s. As much as it hurts American pride to admit it, Canada and the rest of the industrialized world has us roundly beat on this one. Those who are so quick to criticize the Canadian system might be better off holding their fire until they’ve shown us they can do better. America, and the world, is waiting.
The efforts, which are getting a largely positive reception from consumer groups, are emerging amid public outrage in several states against insurers that have voided policies after the beneficiaries started racking up large claims for cancer or other serious illnesses.
Last week, an arbitration judge in California awarded $9.4 million, mostly in punitive damages, to a hairdresser whose medical coverage was canceled by Health Net Inc. The insurer, which acted while the woman was undergoing treatment for breast cancer, claimed that she had falsified information about her weight and failed to mention a heart murmur. The judge ruled that Health Net's conduct was "reprehensible" and unlawful. ...
Last year, the Connecticut attorney general's office investigated complaints about coverage denials by units of Assurant Inc. In one case, the company refused to pay a 34-year-old woman's bills after she was diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma, according to the attorney general's office. The insurer claimed she had a pre-existing condition because during a postenrollment doctor's visit she recalled experiencing mild shortness of breath while exercising six months earlier, the office said. Under a state order, the company's decision was later reversed and the woman's claims were paid.
"The stories are heart wrenching of people who have paid their money and are relying on the care they paid for, only to have the rug suddenly pulled out from under them," said Betsy Imholz, special projects director at the nonprofit advocacy group Consumers Union.
The report says, “Medicare spends more per beneficiary in Medicare Advantage than it does for beneficiaries in the original Medicare fee-for-service program, at an estimated additional cost to Medicare of $54 billion from 2009 through 2012.” ...
Medicare makes substantial contributions to the earnings of insurers like Humana and UnitedHealth. Representative Pete Stark, the California Democrat who is chairman of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health, said, “Medicare overpayments fatten company profits, even as many seniors face higher costs in private plans than they would in traditional Medicare.”
Democrats tried unsuccessfully last year to cut Medicare payments to private plans. CIBC World Markets, an investment bank, predicted last month that “Humana and the Medicare industry will have at least two years, and probably three years, of continued strong enrollment and earnings growth.”
Critics had said that restricting use of propofol would discourage patients from undergoing a colonoscopy. Cancers of the colon and rectum trail only lung and prostate cancer in cancer deaths among Americans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but survival rates are high when they are caught early. ...
The American Gastroenterological Association, a medical society representing the doctors who perform colonoscopies, had recommended that Aetna defer its plan and praised the company on Wednesday. But the battle is far from over. Aetna said that it expected the Food and Drug Administration to approve new devices or drugs that would allow it to revisit its coverage as soon as this summer with the support of doctors who perform colonoscopies.
Keep the Pressure on! Take a stand! SAY NO to Pay Cuts! Tell me more...
First of all, you don't have to attend unless you are directed by your line management IN WRITING to attend. You can't be accused of insubordination for not attending if your P/A holding manager has not formally directed you to attend. You don't report to HR or to legal and they can't force you to do anything. They can only force something if they have found you are doing something illegal and the action must be altered or stopped.
Second of all, if an IBM attorney attends, then in some states you have the right to legal representation if the attorney is present and performing as an attorney. You also don't have to sign any documents unless you have time to review them. Make sure if they are legal documents that there is a notary there as well (another witness) that is not beholden or representing one of the parties (IBM). Don't fall for them asking you to sign and "we'll get a notary later". In some states that's illegal. Tell that to the attorney's face. Ask the attorney "Do you as a member of the state bar agree that a notary is not required to be present to witness this document?" and that'll get them thinking.
I refused to attend my re-classification meeting. My response stated that I'd be happy to attend if I was allowed my legal representation or if I was allowed to videotape the meeting. I'm not in a hurry to be re-classified again. -Something Smells in HR-
It's the select few in upper management that are causing all of this as well. As one famous female of the group has stated to the ranks, "It will be like putting a square peg into a round hole. Keep POUNDING until it fits"
There is a drive to make the books look very good. They have been working with a consortium based in India for selling Global. Don't expect the fear mongering to stop when we sell either. The new group will look to level set FTE expenses with what it pays in other countries...cost of living is not a factor.
I am close to my retirement so I am putting in my time. I am sorry for those that are affected. The pay cuts are looking at an average of 26% now, versus the 32% that what the average prior. Select few didn't comprehend the billing factor (snicker), as far as legal exposure. They made money hand over fist when the bill over approx 48.00 because your salary is covered at that point, the rest is cream to pull off the table into the books at 100% Best wishes to everyone -insider-
As we have started the New Year I wanted to take a moment to thank each of you for your hard work in 2007. As the “In the Public Eye” newsletter mentioned in the email from this weekend, we made some good progress in 2007 but did not quite meet our objectives. I truly appreciate your efforts throughout 2007. I especially want to thank those of you who sacrificed some of your vacation time to contribute to the year end proposals the Government and other industries prior to the holidays. We had a number of significant new business wins in 2007, and are looking forward to an even stronger 2008.
While AIS had a number of strong wins and excellent delivery performance across a number of clients last year, 2007 AIS practice results were less than plan in several areas. We had a tough year with utilization challenges and finding qualified resources to join our team as well as some deals moving out to 2008. As we now have started 2008, I need your help and attention to various elements that significantly impact the success of our business. We can have a great 2008 with just a little effort on all of our parts and drive year-to-year growth.
As we prepare for these our 2008 challenges, I wanted to share with you some important policy information on capacity for Public Sector. Please ensure you read the information carefully and if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact your SAM, 2nd line or SAL or Delivery Executive.
Chargeable Hours. Over the last several years, the Sector’s overtime utilization (defined as the total amount of productive hours charged) has eroded from 110% to our current 107.2%. This erosion has led to a decrease in labor hours and higher labor rate costs. In addition, administrative and bid and proposal (B&P) labor hours and costs have increased as we pursue a number of new business opportunities. In order to maintain affordable labor rates for our customers, increase sector profitability, and increase available B&P, we need the following actions from each of you in 2008: 1) increase project charging to a minimum of 44 hours in all possible cases and 2) drive 10-15% overtime with billable (preferable) or non-project activities such as B&P, marketing, education, and investments. This capacity model allows us to meet our business targets and still accommodate planned time away for education, vacations, and holidays. This model is consistent with what is being driven across our other Public Sector practices.
A minimum 44 hour work week is standard across most industries, particularly the Consulting Services and IT Industry. We find that many of our practitioners are already charging a minimum of 44 hours per week. However there is many that are restricted to 40 hours by their project. In 2008, Public Sector has launched an initiative that will engage our Delivery Executives and Project Management teams to further promote the 110% capacity business model that includes reporting overtime hours for client billable, B&P, education, and other internal investments. Effective immediately all staff should submit their weekly time sheets with no fewer than 44 hours per week (unless you are out on vacation or are ill). If you are unable to charge at least 44 hours to your project you should contact your SAM or 2nd line to discuss how we can work with you and your project teams to accommodate this.
As a reminder, you should always charge all hours worked, whether these hours are Contract, Bid & Proposal, MOS, Authorized Education, Internal Project or Authorized Overhead When staffed full time on a project that is not capped to 40 hours per week, you should work and charge a minimum of 44 hours per week to the contract. When staffed on a contract that is capped at 40 hours per week and you are not working more than 40 hours, then you should charge 40 hours to the contract and a minimum of 4 hours to other activities such as Bid & Proposal work, Internal Projects, and/or authorized Education.
We are planning a large AIS networking and education event for later this year to provide technical training to a large audience in AIS. In order to have this event we need 1Q to start off with strong AIS business results.
Hours Plan: Each month, our practice is asked to forecast our utilization and headcount to the Public Sector and GBS leadership team. Your monthly hours plan is critical to that practice forecast. In 4Q 2007, we had over 200 of these plans that were not completed which meant 0% utilization was forecasted for those individuals in hours plan; this also meant our forecast reporting was not nearly as accurate as it could have and should have been. With over 1400 people in AIS, we need each and every person to complete an accurate forecast in hours plan. Hours plan forecasts as well as timely submission of timecards each week is very important to your personal performance as well as to the practice performance, and subject to our Public Sector“Administrative Good Standing” policy. If you have any problems working with hours plan, please contact your RDM or manager for assistance.
Current RDM Support is as follows: Barbara Pylant Lead RDM and Manager for all AIS RDMS RDM for O&M under Diane Chan and all of Brian's direct reports Jennifer Kramer AD - All people under Linda Zweibel Marisa Hart AD - All people under Milt Harrison Theresa Poffenberger Architect team under Stas Tarchalski and the Delivery teams under B. Koeritzer, W. Zeek, J. Wilcox, J. Thomas, W. Joyner, and T. O'Rourke Michelle Arena All of Security and Privacy under John Lainhart Diane Berry-Brownhill All of IOD under Suresh Kripalani James Newcomb TS&OS under Gary Foster for Wanda Stewart's team Mary Mudryk Remainder of TS&OS under Gary Foster and NSJ (Rusty Patrick & Lem Moore teams)
As you work throughout the year, please get to know your RDM and keep them in informed about your assignment. When you are scheduled to roll-off a project or assignment, the RDM is required to work with you 45 days before your assignment ends to help ensure you are assigned a new project. Your RDM and manager want to help you find you next engagement, so they must know details on when assignments are ending or renewing before it gets to that date. At a minimum, please let your RDM and manager know immediately if you are required to roll off early for any reason as well as if you are being extended on a project. This helps everyone work together at least 2 weeks before an assignment changes to ensure everyone has a project or assignment to move to.
We will also be working with project managers and project executives across the sector to ensure they are aware of these business metrics and can help positively impact our results.
Referrals: Public Sector still has a significant number of open positions to fill. If you have colleagues with strong consulting and technology skills, please refer them to IBM through the IBM Employee Referral Bonus and get a $5000 bonus for helping to bring them on board! See the note from Shelley Smith sent on February 14th for more information..
2008: I’m absolutely excited about the opportunities we have in 2008. We have some key large deals in the pipeline and a number of contracts performing extremely well which will no doubt lead to add-on signings for these contracts. We're only going to win these deals and delight our clients through the efforts of each and every one of you as you help lead AIS to an outstanding 2008.
Thanks for your help and commitment as we continue to drive up our utilization, headcount, signings, revenue and profitability.
Brian Helmey, AIS Practice Leader and Partner, IBM Global Business Services, firstname.lastname@example.org " -SameOldSong-
I have been gone for a month now and have never been happier. There are actually companies outside of IBM who treat their employees with respect. Granted the money isn't as good as I was getting paid but the peace of mind and happiness outweighs the treatment I was getting at IBM. So my advice to everyone that has their 30 years and collect their pension is to get your resume up to date, find a job and stick it to IBM. Why go through the best years of your life going to a job where you are being treated so bad and are miserable?
Maybe if enough highly skilled people leave they will realize that cutting pay and outsourcing isn't such a great idea. Also, another tip, if you do get resourced, you can report your manager to Corporate HR and still keep your severance package. Just make sure to write on the letter you are not filing an appeal or open door. -No More Big Blue-
Social security losses are one example. The employee contributes about 7.5% of his pay and the employer makes a matching contribution and so you lose an est. additional $750 in FICA contributions (when your pay is cut by $9k/yr ( you\'re losing the employer match contribution) That means less money in your retirement years too.
Your vacation pay...holiday pay.....and what if, God forbid, you ever need to claim disability benefits... overtime is not factored into those benefits now is it ? If you have earned three weeks of vacation per year you better figure on working 47 hours a week not just 46 to make up for those vacation days/weeks.
If you have a loan or credit card debt. Some of you may have your credit profiles readjusted as your debt to income ratio changes...you\'ll have a lower credit score... and that may increase the interest that you pay on your credit cards pushing you further into the hole.. Many people fail to see this relationship here as it is not necessarily immediate and your severance package.
We're about seven months away from the next round of H1-b students graduating. These foreign students are another opportunity for the company to cut cost again, Should you get hit with a layoff, your severance package will most likely be based upon base wags not overtime pay. Not to mention that effects to your local committees due to the loss revenue. Yes my friends, some people call it the trickle down economics effect.....but ..I call it piss on the people economics ! -oz-
I had my first offer three weeks after I learned of the pay cuts (I also started submitting my resume the day I found out about the cuts). When I received my offer letter in July it was an agreement between two bodies. IBM agreed to employ me, provide benefits, and pay me a specified salary in exchange for my effort as a consultant. Since they have decided that they don't need to keep up their end of the bargain, I have decided that I don't need to keep up my end. I have resorted to producing very little output. I spend my entire day finding a new job, and produce the bare minimum, and usually even less than that. I'm leaving, why should I care? I hope a lot more people are doing this.
I really think bringing this to the attention of the clients is important as well. The most insulting part of all this is that I was never classified correctly from the beginning. I never even wanted to be an IT Specialist. This was a miscommunication with HR when negotiating my position. Not having known better, I said "I don't want to be an IT Specialist, I want to be a consultant". The HR person answered me with: "Oh you will definitely be a consultant, we just call you an IT Specialist as an internal descriptor". I was too happy with the rest of the package to really push the issue, as they said I could change it whenever I want anyway. Boy did I learn my lesson there.
I don't even do work that resembles my job description, and I know for a fact that my appeal will be rejected. I hope it is. I wouldn't want my disgust with this horrid beast of a company to wane during my last weeks with the company. I have come to the same conclusion that others here have: the fact that IBM would make such a moronic decision as this is clear evidence that the company has completely lost its mind, and is not a place that I would ever want to work.
I will never work for (or with) IBM again, EVER. I have interviewed with 4 other prominent consulting companies, put my project work to a near halt, notified my project managers that I am leaving in the near future as I negotiate my new salary (which will be a SIGNIFICANT raise from my salary BEFORE it was cut). This was a favor to them (who don't need to be victims), because it gives them the opportunity to find my replacement. I waited until I had finished interviewing before notifying them. I have joined the alliance, but because I have lost faith in IBM, I now know that I would never stay at this company even if they gave me my old salary back. As a result I have not escalated to upper management. I spent that time preparing my resume and submitting it to prominent consulting companies. -Outta Here!-
Working for IBM is like being in an abusive relationship. The abuser will try to make you feel that you deserve the abuse, and couldn't possibly find better elsewhere. A good abuser will wear you down and make you actually believe that to some degree. So be grateful you're on your way out. Some of us are less mobile for a variety of reasons, and trying our best to leave. Just takes time. Not as easy for some as for you, you lucky dog you. :-) -Anon-
Thank you for such a wonderful growth opportunity, and thank you for letting me know just how shameful and cold hearted your company is... Not to mention how stupid your managers are! I mean, what are you thinking? Do you really think you can cut employee paychecks and expect them to stay?
If your plan was to drive away your most talented employees, then give yourself a pat on the back! Rest assured that most of the employees who stay with your company will be the bottom of the barrel: either they will be committed for pension reasons (one of the few reasons I can sympathize with), or they will be those employees who are too lazy, unskilled or apathetic to find something new. Either way, you can rest assured that your obvious goal of never getting anything done will be attained with the utmost efficiency.
Congrats! Since I am going to one of Fortune's "100 best places to work", I feel confident that my new managers would never do something as degrading and moronic as cut pay for highly skilled IT workers. Again, I thank you for being so short-sighted, disloyal, and callous. Your inept managerial staff has opened some incredible doors for me! Sincerely, -Outta Here!-
Vault's IBM Business Consulting Services message board is a popular hangout for IBM BCS employees, including many employees acquired from PwC.
Then a kind and more senior colleague that was about to leave Big Blue tells me to seek my fortune elsewhere and to look up Vault. I read the threads and felt more despondent about my job than ever, but a seed of hope gets planted. I finally work out the basic maths that being a contractor = doing pretty much the same work with less hours and more pay. I leave the blue pig and predictably, my work-life balance, bank balance and mental+physical health improves by leaps and bounds.
So a big thanks to Dose, civilliberty, ancientblueconsultant and all the posters here for giving me the courage to take that second chance to salvage my career! :)
I'm currently working as a contract coder in the custom application development space(mostly Java platforms) and for now, I'm quite happy about the way things are. I'm living life as a carefree twenty-something with time for a social life as well as the money to put away towards travelling and investing (instead of working late nights and weekends unpaid while watching my face and waistline prematurely age).
However, I don't want to end up stuck in a rut again by not making plans for the future. I was appalled by how many band 7s and 8s in Big Blue were so miserable but felt like they had no way out. I don't want to end up with outdated skills or a hopeless mind set like that, so I'm constantly looking to educate myself and upgrade my skills.
I've been working for my current client for about a year now and have become something of a go-to guy(to my surprise, hard work gets rewarded here, unlike at Big Blue), and they have started to occasionally let me take on more roles in smaller projects due to staff shortage and because they've grown to trust me and see me as a valuable asset they want to retain. Some of these roles included being a stand-in systems analyst while one of their analysts was away for a a long holiday and as a test team lead for a small upgrade project. It's just ridiculous that I got more rotation and variety in roles whilst working as a contractor than within the farcical grad program run by the blue pig.
Anyhow, can you give me any further career advancement advice? Should I move out of the customs application development space? Learn SAP? Siebel? Tibco? Enroll in a business degree?
I lean more towards the technical side of things and older contractors that I've met tell me that as long as I can rub 2 brain cells together, there should never be a shortage of contract work for techy people like me, but I don't want take that for granted. And I guess, I'm starting to get sick of doing the same thing and I'm looking to try something else(hopefully that something else will be a role that's harder to export to offshore teams). I'm not 100% sure if I would fancy being a project manager or being a true strategy consultant though. Looking forward to your thoughts!
For your own sake, develop an interest in the business side of IT, so that you can demonstrate to potential employers that you have business acumen coupled with technical ability. This is still viewed favourabley by many employers. I'm not sure ultimately where the ERP market is heading, but a US survey says that many business's see this as strategic (and quite rightly so since it is often a core enabler for enterprise these days)and one they are investing in more.
I'm hoping and expecting that as the failed off-shoring and out-sourcing efforts get more media attention fewer organisations will be prepared to take the risks - whether this represents a substantial turning of the tide remains to be seen though.
If you have a flair for management (with the interest that goes with it), then you may want to position yourself to take that path - I think there will always be a need for string management, regardless of outsourcing or off-shoring - it's a question of whether this is your field of interest (apart from occasional team lead activities I don't engage much in it).
When I see news stories like Sam buying W's summer home in Maine, I know the Illuminati or some bunch very much like them is running the country.
We are in a cycle, very similar to the late 1890's and mid 1920's, were CEOs were rock stars, had unfettered power and the pursuit of material gains was endemically popular with most Americans. The cycle reached its zenith in the 2004 election and the pendulum is moving back. It won't be long when many business schools will use IBM as the shining "bad boy" example of this latest cycle of unbridled greed and avarice fueled by materialism.
The new generation of Americans is seeing right through the con job. IBM's hiring among young Americans has become a problem. Sales job postings going begging even with promises of unlimited commission go unfilled now because today's youth don't want to experience the materialism and broken pension and medical promises given to their parents generation. That's one of the reasons for the move over seas. Not enough brand blinded materialistic and greedy young to be fooled anymore in this country.
I have just been offered a software engineer/individual contributor role at google. Although there is a degree of prestige there, it is a step back from my current role in terms of responsibility. Any insights that you guys can provide will be greatly appreciated.
In any case, the question is what do you want to do? Stating that being an individual contributor is a "step back" means you've drunk the kool-aid for management and you are on track to get out of the technical part of the business. Nothing wrong with that, but you should realize that you transitioned into management, not IT Architecture. Don't delude yourself into thinking you can be a techie and a manager at the same time, especially in a company like IBM. You have 2 sets of choices. Stay in IBM for a long time or not. Stay in management or not.
If you are a techie at heart and want to have an impressive resume, then I can't understand why you haven't moved to Google already. Having Google in your resume is like having Microsoft 10-15 years ago. You are leading edge.
If you are looking at a management career, then the key is having been successful in more than one culture. You have been successful at a large behemoth such as IBM and if you go to Google, get a supervisory position, then you can show the ability to excel and grow into management no matter what the corporate environment: large and process oriented (IBM) or fast growing and entrepreneurial (Google).
The longer you stay at IBM, the longer you risk being labelled a "lifer" IBMer, which is very "resume dangerous". Just to avoid this career issue, I'd just go to Google then you can come back (if you still think it's the right thing after being exposed and having your head reshaped by Google and the California Silicon Valley mentality) and get a higher position at IBM quicker than if you stayed and languished doing PBC's as a manager.
So the answer? What are you waiting for? I'm just stunned your asking for advice!
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.