Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links
"News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues."
Search:
Web This Site

Quick Links:
  Get involved!
  Press articles
  Important Links
  Insider trading
  Lou's Contract
  Total Compensation
Subscribe:
  Add or delete ID
  Change ID
  Contact site owner
Previous Highlights:
  Current
  April 21, 2007
  April 14, 2007
  April 7, 2007
  March 31, 2007
  March 24, 2007
  March 17, 2007
  March 10, 2007
  March 3, 2007
  February 24, 2007
  February 17, 2007
  February 10, 2007
  February 3, 2007
  January 27, 2007
  January 20, 2007
  January 13, 2007
  January 6, 2007
  December 30, 2006
  December 23, 2006
  December 16, 2006
  December 9, 2006
  December 2, 2006
  November 25, 2006
  November 18, 2006
  November 11, 2006
  November 4, 2006
  October 28, 2006
  October 21, 2006
  October 14, 2006
  October 7, 2006
  September 30, 2006
  September 23, 2006
  September 16, 2006
  September 9, 2006
  September 2, 2006
  August 26, 2006
  August 19, 2006
  August 12, 2006
  August 5, 2006
  July 29, 2006
  July 22, 2006
  July 15, 2006
  July 8, 2006
  July 1, 2006
  June 24, 2006
  June 17, 2006
  June 10, 2006
  June 3, 2006
  May 27, 2006
  May 20, 2006
  May 13, 2006
  May 6, 2006
  2006 Stock Meeting
  April 22, 2006
  April 15, 2006
  April 8, 2006
  April 1, 2006
  March 25, 2006
  March 18, 2006
  March 11, 2006
  March 4, 2006
  February 25, 2006
  February 18, 2006
  February 11, 2006
  February 4, 2006
  January 28, 2006
  January 21, 2006
  January 14, 2006
  January 7, 2006
  December 31, 2005
  December 24, 2005
  December 17, 2005
  December 10, 2005
  December 03, 2005
  November 26, 2005
  November 19, 2005
  November 12, 2005
  November 5, 2005
  October 29, 2005
  October 22, 2005
  October 15, 2005
  October 8, 2005
  October 1, 2005
  September 24, 2005
  September 17, 2005
  September 10, 2005
  September 3, 2005
  August 27, 2005
  August 20, 2005
  August 13, 2005
  August 6, 2005
  July 30, 2005
  July 23, 2005
  July 16, 2005
  July 9, 2005
  July 2, 2005
  June 25, 2005
  June 18, 2005
  June 11, 2005
  June 4, 2005
  May 28, 2005
  May 21, 2005
  May 14, 2005
  May 7, 2005
  April 30, 2005
  April 23, 2005
  April 16, 2005
  April 9, 2005
  April 2, 2005
  March 26, 2005
  March 19, 2005
  March 12, 2005
  March 5, 2005
  February 26, 2005
  February 19, 2005
  February 12, 2005
  February 5, 2005
  January 29, 2005
  January 22, 2005
  January 15, 2005
  January 8, 2005
  January 1, 2005
  December 25, 2004
  December 18, 2004
  December 11, 2004
  December 4, 2004
  November 27, 2004
  November 20, 2004
  November 13, 2004
  November 6, 2004
  October 30, 2004
  October 23, 2004
  October 16, 2004
  October 9, 2004
  October 2, 2004
  September 25, 2004
  September 18, 2004
  September 11, 2004
  September 4, 2004
  August 28, 2004
  August 21, 2004
  August 14, 2004
  August 7, 2004
  July 31, 2004
  July 24, 2004
  July 17, 2004
  July 10, 2004
  July 3, 2004
  June 26, 2004
  June 19, 2004
  June 5, 2004
  May 29, 2004
  May 22, 2004
  May 15, 2004
  May 8, 2004
  2004 Stock Meeting
  April 24, 2004
  April 10, 2004
  April 3, 2004
  March 27, 2004
  March 20, 2004
  March 13, 2004
  March 6, 2004
  February 28, 2004
  February 21, 2004
  February 14, 2004
  February 7, 2004
  February 1, 2004
  January 18, 2004
  December 27, 2003
  December 20, 2003
  December 13, 2003
  December 6, 2003
  November 29, 2003
  November 22, 2003
  November 15, 2003
  November 8, 2003
  November 1, 2003
  October 25, 2003
  October 18, 2003
  October 11, 2003
  October 4, 2003
  September 27, 2003
  September 20, 2003
  September 13, 2003
  September 6, 2003
  August 30, 2003
  August 23, 2003
  August 16, 2003
  August 9, 2003
  Pension Lawsuit Win
  July 26, 2003
  July 19, 2003
  July 12, 2003
  July 5, 2003
  June 28, 2003
  June 21, 2003
  June 14, 2003
  June 7, 2003
  May 31, 2003
  May 24, 2003
  May 17, 2003
  May 10, 2003
  2003 Stock Meeting
  April 26, 2003
  April 19, 2003
  April 12, 2003
  April 5, 2003
  March 29, 2003
  March 22, 2003
  March 15, 2003
  March 8, 2003
  March 1, 2003
  February 22, 2003
  February 15, 2003
  February 8, 2003
  February 1, 2003
  January 25, 2003
  January 18, 2003
  January 11, 2003
  January 4, 2003
  December 28, 2002
  December 21, 2002
  December 14, 2002
  December 7, 2002
  November 30, 2002
  November 23, 2002
  November 16, 2002
  November 9, 2002
  November 2, 2002
  October 26, 2002
  October 19, 2002
  October 12, 2002
  October 5, 2002
  September 28, 2002
  September 21, 2002
  September 14, 2002
  September 7, 2002
  August 31, 2002
  August 24, 2002
  August 17, 2002
  August 10, 2002
  August 3, 2002
  July 27, 2002
  July 20, 2002
  July 13, 2002
  July 6, 2002
  June 29, 2002
  June 22, 2002
  June 15, 2002
  June 8, 2002
  June 1, 2002
  May 25, 2002
  May 18, 2002
  May 11, 2002
  2002 Stock Meeting
  April 27, 2002
  April 20, 2002
  April 13, 2002
  April 6, 2002
  March 30, 2002
  March 23, 2002
  March 16, 2002
  March 9, 2002
  March 2, 2002
  February 23, 2002
  February 16, 2002
  February 9, 2002
  February 2, 2002
  January 26, 2002
  January 19, 2002
  January 12, 2002
  January 5, 2002
  December 29, 2001
  December 22, 2001
  December 15, 2001
  December 8, 2001
  December 1, 2001
  November 24, 2001
  November 17, 2001
  November 10, 2001
  November 3, 2001
  October 27, 2001
  October 20, 2001
  October 13, 2001
  October 6, 2001
  September 29, 2001
  September 22, 2001
  September 15, 2001
  September 8, 2001
  September 1, 2001
  August 25, 2001
  August 18, 2001
  August 11, 2001
  August 4, 2001
  July 28, 2001
  July 21, 2001
  July 14, 2001
  July 7, 2001
  June 30, 2001
  June 23, 2001
  June 16, 2001
  June 9, 2001
  June 2, 2001
  May 26, 2001
  May 19, 2001
  May 12, 2001
  May 5, 2001
  2001 Stock Meeting
  April 21, 2001
  April 14, 2001
  April 7, 2001
  March 31, 2001
  March 24, 2001
  March 17, 2001
  March 10, 2001
  March 3, 2001
  February 24, 2001
  February 17, 2001
  February 10, 2001
  February 3, 2001
  January 27, 2001
  January 20, 2001
  January 13, 2001
  January 6, 2001
  December 30, 2000
  December 23, 2000
  December 16, 2000
  December 9, 2000
  December 2, 2000
  November 24, 2000
  November 17, 2000
  November 10, 2000
  November 4, 2000
  October 28, 2000
  October 21, 2000
  October 14, 2000
  October 7, 2000
  September 30, 2000
  September 23, 2000
  September 16, 2000
  September 9, 2000
  September 2, 2000
  August 26, 2000
  August 19, 2000
  August 12, 2000
  July 29, 2000
  July 22, 2000
  July 15, 2000
  July 1, 2000
  June 24, 2000
  June 17, 2000
  June 10, 2000
  June 3, 2000
  May 27, 2000
  May 20, 2000
  May 13, 2000
  May 6, 2000
  April, 2000
 

Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits - Join the Alliance!

Retirees, Vendors, Contractors, Temps, and Active Employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance.


    Highlights—December 3, 2005

  • New York Times: Age of Anxiety. By Paul Krugman. Excerpts: Many eulogies were published following the recent death of Peter Drucker, the great management theorist. I was surprised, however, that few of these eulogies mentioned his book ''The Age of Discontinuity,'' a prophetic work that speaks directly to today's business headlines and economic anxieties. Mr. Drucker wrote ''The Age of Discontinuity'' in the late 1960's, a time when most people assumed that the big corporations of the day, companies like General Motors and U.S. Steel, would dominate the economy for the foreseeable future. He argued that this assumption was all wrong. [...]
    American workers at big companies used to think they had made a deal. They would be loyal to their employers, and the companies in turn would be loyal to them, guaranteeing job security, health care and a dignified retirement. Such deals were, in a real sense, the basis of America's postwar social order. We like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists, not like those coddled Europeans with their oversized welfare states. But as Jacob Hacker of Yale points out in his book ''The Divided Welfare State,'' if you add in corporate spending on health care and pensions -- spending that is both regulated by the government and subsidized by tax breaks -- we actually have a welfare state that's about as large relative to our economy as those of other advanced countries.
    The resulting system is imperfect: those who don't work for companies with good benefits are, in effect, second-class citizens. Still, the system more or less worked for several decades after World War II. Now, however, deals are being broken and the system is failing. Remember, Delphi was once part of General Motors, and its workers thought they were totally secure. What went wrong? An important part of the answer is that America's semiprivatized welfare state worked in the first place only because we had a stable corporate order. And that stability -- along with any semblance of economic security for many workers -- is now gone. Regular readers of this column know what I think we should do: instead of trying to provide economic security through the back door, via tax breaks designed to encourage corporations to provide health care and pensions, we should provide it through the front door, starting with national health insurance. You may disagree. But one thing is clear: Mr. Drucker's age of discontinuity is also an age of anxiety, in which workers can no longer count on loyalty from their employers.
  • In a Yahoo! message board post, Janet Krueger answers this question: Please tell me if I have a valid concern here. I finish my 30 years in 2011 and will be 53 years old. Let us say I retire at 53 with my 30 years of service completed. Now, let us play the worse case scenario game. If the US Government Pension Guarantee Corporation ends up with the responsibility for IBM's pension obligations after I retire, will my pension checks stop or be reduced until I reach the age of 65?
    Ms. Krueger replies: I don't think you are even close to the worst case scenario... In your case, the worst -- and most likely -- scenario, based on what has happened with many of your colleagues who are a little older than you, is that IBM will lay you off in 2009. This will leave you with a much reduced pension, no health care benefits beyond Cobra, and no job.
    Another bad and not impossible scenario is that IBM will convert all the second choicers to a new, but lower, cash balance plan. It should be noted that they can also convert the no-choicers from a cash balance plan that had 5% salary credits to one that has 3% salary credits -- after all, the cash balance accounts are not real, but just calculated based on the formula 'du jour'. This is especially likely if Congress proceeds with legalizing such conversions without any protections for older workers.
    Since the IBM pension fund was fully funded as of the last annual report, there is little likelihood that the PBGC would step in, especially since IBM has formed their new practise of laying off new employees before they vest in the pension fund and laying off older employees before they reach full retirement -- the policy isn't much good for individual employees, but it greatly enhances IBM's ability to squeeze more virtual income from the pension fund!
  • Washington Post Writers Group: Rescuing the Fragile Private Pension System. By Marie Cocco. Excerpts: It is, perhaps, to be done in the grand tradition of burning the village in order to save it. When the House of Representatives returns from its Thanksgiving break next week, lawmakers are poised to give corporations legal sanction to cut the pensions promised to millions of older workers in the name of rescuing the fragile private pension system. Of course, this is not what they say they are doing. [...]
    Among the revisions is a change that makes legal the conversions of traditional pensions to ``cash balance'' plans. This is a corporate cost-cutting endeavor which, for years now, has been stymied by lawsuits and government regulation as a form of illegal age discrimination. In a "cash balance" plan, workers earn pension credits consistently over a lifetime of work. Older workers who were previously covered by plans under which the amount of expected benefit would increase with longevity -- with much of the eventual monthly pension amount determined in the last years of work -- lose out.
    The Government Accountability Office reported in October that workers of all ages, not just those who are middle-aged, lose money when their plans are converted to cash-balance pensions. Despite corporate claims that the cash-balance pensions are great for young workers, a typical 30-year-old still loses about $59 a month in promised benefits when a traditional pension is converted, the GAO found. [...]
    The harsh treatment of middle-aged workers is the basis of dozens of age-discrimination suits. IBM pension beneficiaries, in fact, won a $1.7 billion settlement after a successful federal lawsuit. But such an injustice against the corporate bottom line, House Republican leaders believe, must not stand. So they immediately moved to make sure no future group of employees could win an age-discrimination claim. Tucked into the larger pension bill is language that basically pronounces cash-balance plans to be free of such discrimination. [...]
    The Senate bill represents the sort of trade-off that used to be common practice, but has become nearly extinct in this era of one-party political control and bare-knuckles partisanship. Roughly put, if corporations are entitled to legal protection from age discrimination claims, then older workers who are caught short in cash-balance conversions are entitled to have their benefits protected. This is not what companies want. The point of converting the pension is, after all, to save corporate money. So what if it comes out of the checks of future retirees? The trouble is that a Congress that blithely does the bidding of its corporate donor-masters is a Congress which has abandoned any pretense of representing the public. Surely House Republicans -- already beset by scandals, public disillusionment over Iraq and a pervasive sense among the citizenry that things have gone off track -- don't want to contend with campaign ads next year that charge them with robbing retirees of $238 a month. Or do they?
  • ZDNet UK: Record rise in overseas IT workers. By Karen Gomm. Excerpts: As many as 22,000 foreign IT workers were issued with work permits for the UK last year, of whom 85 percent were from India, according to a report by the Association of Technology Staffing Companies (ATSCO), which extracted the figures from the Home Office. Ann Swain, chief executive of ATSCO, said the UK is not only outsourcing low level IT jobs to India but is also receiving high level expertise from the region. "The transfer of jobs between the UK and India is now very much two way traffic. "The irony is that while low-skilled IT jobs continue to be shipped to India, highly skilled Indian IT professionals are coming to the UK to take up managerial roles," she said. [...] PayScale, which claims to be the largest database of employee salary information in the world, said a seasoned software programmer in India is currently paid $11,423 (£6,649) a year, roughly one fifth of a UK equivalent.
  • Los Angeles Times: As Profits Surge, Workers Still Wait. By Tom Petruno. Excerpts: This is Wall Street's version of comfort food: Corporate earnings keep rising at a double-digit pace while workers are lucky to get even low-single-digit wage increases. For the last few years, those trends have been dependable and soothing for many stock market bulls — if not for the average worker. It's a world in which share prices are underpinned by healthy earnings while inflation risks are muted because employee pay isn't in danger of an upward spiral. [...] As for the workers whose toil is producing these handsome results, wages and salaries for all private-industry employees rose 2.2% in the 12 months ended Sept. 30, according to the government's employment cost index. That was down from a 2.6% increase in the year ended September 2004. Add in benefits such as healthcare coverage, and total employment costs were up 3% in the most recent 12 months, compared with 3.7% in the previous period, government data show.
  • NewsMax: GM CEO Secures $4.6 Million Pension. By Carl Limbacher. Excerpts: As General Motors slashes jobs, closes plants and battles to avoid bankruptcy, the company’s CEO has set up a retirement plan that will pay him at least $4.6 million a year – nearly twice his current salary. G. Richard Wagoner, who the New York Post calls "the greediest, most undeserving CEO since Chainsaw Al Dunlap,” was named GM’s chief financial officer in 1992, when the company had a global payroll of 750,000 employees. Under Wagoner’s command as CFO and, since 2000, CEO, the carmaker has seen its employees dwindle to 324,000. [...] The carmaker’s pension fund is under-funded by more than $45 billion, according to the Post. But Wagoner has nothing to worry about. He has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which allows a company to use after-tax dollars "that rightly belong to shareholders to shower riches on the CEO instead,” the Post reports.
  • New York Times: Sometimes, a Tax Cut for the Wealthy Can Hurt the Wealthy. By Robert H. Frank. Excerpts: WHEN market forces cause income inequality to grow, public policy in most countries tends to push in the opposite direction. In the United States, however, we enact tax cuts for the wealthy and cut public services for the needy. Cynics explain this curious inversion by saying that the wealthy have captured the political process in Washington and are exploiting it to their own advantage. This explanation makes sense, however, only if those in power have an extremely naïve understanding of their own interests. A careful reading of the evidence suggests that even the wealthy have been made worse off, on balance, by recent tax cuts. The private benefits of these cuts have been much smaller, and their indirect costs much larger, than many recipients appear to have anticipated. [...]
    On the cost side of the ledger, the federal budget deficits created by the recent tax cuts have had serious consequences, even for the wealthy. These deficits will exceed $300 billion for each of the next six years, according to projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The most widely reported consequences of the deficits have been cuts in government programs that serve the nation's poorest families. And since the wealthy are well represented in our political system, their favored programs may seem safe from the budget ax. Wealthy families have further insulated themselves by living in gated communities and sending their children to private schools. Yet such steps go only so far. For example, deficits have led to cuts in federal financing for basic scientific research, even as the United States' share of global patents granted continues to decline. Such cuts threaten the very basis of our long-term economic prosperity. As Senator Pete Domenici, Republican of New Mexico, said: ''We thought we'd keep the high-end jobs, and others would take the low-end jobs. We're now on track to a second-rate economy and a second-rate country.''
  • New York Times: Middle Class Gets in Line for Help With Rising Heating Bills. By Paul Vitello. Excerpts: The main government assistance office in Suffolk County sits just off a busy road in an office park surrounded by a neighborhood of deep lawns and two-car garages. Everyone for miles around uses that road every day. But until recently, hardly anyone from the neighborhood -- people whose status in the middle class was thought secured unquestionably by homeownership -- ever turned into the office park to seek help inside the county's nondescript building. This year, they have come in from the fear of the cold. They are retirees, young couples, the temporarily unemployed, the two-income families stretched to the limit of second mortgages and credit cards, a slice of the suburban demographic that social workers call ''mortgage rich and pocket poor.'' The cost of natural gas heat, already high, has risen 50 percent since last year. Home heating oil prices are up 30 percent. What that means for the larger economy will be divined by economists.
  • National Public Radio: Health Care Costs and the Future of U.S. Labor (audio). Day to Day, November 23, 2005 · Madeleine Brand discusses the national employment outlook with Andrew Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, the largest and fastest-growing union in the United States. Stern warns that mass layoffs -- such as those announced earlier this week by GM, which plans to shed 30,000 workers and close North American production facilities -- will continue unless the United States moves away from a health care system that places most of the financial burden on employers.
  • New York Times: Gimme an Rx! Cheerleaders Pep Up Drug Sales. By Stephanie Saul. Excerpts: As an ambitious college student, Cassie Napier had all the right moves -- flips, tumbles, an ever-flashing America's sweetheart smile -- to prepare for her job after graduation. She became a drug saleswoman. Ms. Napier, 26, was a star cheerleader on the national-champion University of Kentucky squad, which has been a springboard for many careers in pharmaceutical sales. She now plies doctors' offices selling the antacid Prevacid for TAP Pharmaceutical Products. Ms. Napier says the skills she honed performing for thousands of fans helped land her job. ''I would think, essentially, that cheerleaders make good sales people,'' she said. Anyone who has seen the parade of sales representatives through a doctor's waiting room has probably noticed that they are frequently female and invariably good looking. Less recognized is the fact that a good many are recruited from the cheerleading ranks.
  • Computerworld: Firm that underpaid H-1B workers to pay fine, $2.25M in back wages. By Patrick Thibodeau. Excerpt: Computech was founded in 1996, and the settlement covers violations alleged to have occurred between 1998 and 2000. Within two years of its founding, the company had brought on more than 200 foreign workers. The company failed to pay these workers minimum required wage rates and “frequently” benched workers, the DOL said in a statement. Benching refers to the practice of not paying workers in between contracting jobs.
  • Computerworld: Analysis: Antioffshoring legislation heats up. Some measures seek to end the offshore outsourcing of jobs altogether. By Nancy Weil. Excerpts: Groups of service and blue-collar workers have mobilized to support laws restricting offshoring. Rescue American Jobs, for instance, has a legislation tracker on its Web site and has as its mission the task of “building the largest American workforce mobilization in history” in response to outsourcing and offshoring. The group, based in Pittsburgh and supported by the United Steelworkers of America, contends that offshoring is a consequence of “executive greed” and urges its members to action.
    On the other side of the spectrum is the Technology CEO Council, a group of leading IT companies, including Dell Inc., Intel Corp., IBM and Motorola Inc. The group posts on its Web site “10 common myths about worldwide sourcing,” including a fact that even some in the antioffshoring movement will acknowledge: that the number of U.S. jobs lost to offshoring is a small percentage of the total workforce.
  • Washington Post: Pensions Unzipped. By Abigail Trafford. Excerpts: Tis the season for calendars, and the grabber this holiday season is the "Stewardesses Stripped (of their Pension?)" calendar for 2006. It features five gorgeous 50-plus women in the buff, covered with enough feathers to permit display in the kitchen but showing enough skin to get public attention. These current and former flight attendants for United Airlines are protesting the loss of their company-funded pensions and they make Diane Keaton, the menopausal chick icon of the movie "Something's Gotta Give," seem like a Victorian prude.
  • Wall Street Journal, courtesy of Factiva: Gray Is Good: Employers Make Efforts To Retain Older, Experienced Workers. By Sue Shellenbarger. Excerpts: Traditionally, many employers have viewed older workers as inflexible, less productive than their younger colleagues, and more expensive because of higher salaries and health-care costs. When hard times force layoffs, older workers are often the first to get the ax. But now, many employers are at least giving lip service to retaining older workers. And a few are taking concrete steps to actually do so -- seeking out older workers and retirees with needed skills, rooting out age bias, and setting up complex flexible work arrangements tailored to their needs. [...]
    Some companies are recognizing that older workers are repositories of hard-to-replace knowledge critical to their businesses, says Eric Lesser, an associate partner in Cambridge, Mass., with IBM Business Consulting Services. As workers retire, companies worry about losing relationships with suppliers and distributors, as well as the ability to maintain aging equipment, such as plants, machinery or other gear built to past standards, he says.
  • W.P. Carey School of Business: Dubious Protection: New Medicare Drug Coverage Could Erode Retiree Perks. Excerpts: If Congress gives it, will employers take it away? That was a question lawmakers considered when debating prescription drug coverage as a new Medicare add-on. In fact, the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 provides $71 billion over the next 10 years to reward and repay employers who keep "qualified" retiree drug coverage in place. This year, it looks like most employers will take the bait and enjoy the cash subsidy. But what about next year? The shrinking prevalence of employer-sponsored health insurance is a longstanding trend, and many foresee further erosion to retiree benefits ahead.
  • Nostalgia from IBM: IBM attire. The way we wore: A century of IBM attire. Excerpt: It wasn't too long ago that some observers said that IBMers wore a uniform of pin-striped suits, white button-down shirts, rep ties and wing-tipped shoes. Who us? While it may have been true there was a time such attire was not uncommon in IBM offices, it is also true that pin-striped suits, white button-down shirts, rep ties and wing-tipped shoes were not unique to IBM -- then or now. In fact, IBM men and women, like people everywhere, have tended to dress pretty much in the fashions prevailing in their own period and place. As the style of business clothing around the world has evolved and varied with the passage of time, so too has the appearance of IBMers changed from year to year and from locale to locale. Here -- in a kind of diversity fashion timeline -- is an album of just some of the many people in many countries who helped to make IBM a 20th century global success. And, aside from a baseball team in 1938, there's not a uniform among them.

Vault Message Board Posts
Vault's IBM Business Consulting Services message board is a popular hangout for IBM BCS employees, including many employees acquired from PwC.

New on the Alliance@IBM Site:
  • Alliance@IBM: Attention IBM employees: IBM is blocking e-mail to and from the Alliance@IBM e-mail address endicottalliance@stny.rr.com from inside the company. Please send your job cut information and other correspondence from your home e-mail. You can also contact us the following ways: Phone 607 658 9285 or Fax 607 658 9283.
  • WashTech News: Bitter Holidays for Nestle USA “Associates” Extensive Outsourcing Sends Work Offshore via HP and IBM. By Dan Gillespie.
  • IBM France union's press release on "Sold off IBMers" job cuts. Excerpt: IBM sub-contracts its layoffs to AMCC. Sold by IBM to AMCC for almost $300 million over the past 2 years, 45 employees are now losing their jobs. On Nov. 29, 2005, AMCC France announced to its workers council that it will cut 45 jobs, or nearly half of its employees there. It is likely that all of these cuts will be made through layoffs.
  • From the Visitor's comment page and the Job Cuts Status & Comments page.
    • Comment 12/01/05: Widespread staff layoffs were announced in the US yesterday. Hardest hit was the marketing organization, which was cut 15%. This explains the sudden resignation of Abby Kohnstamm, senior VP of Marketing, that was announced by Sam Palmisano on 11/14. Legal, finance, and operations also suffered layoffs. Many of the affected were in the White Plains & Somers areas, but others worked from home throughout the country. Ironically, the cuts were across the board, affecting even people supporting business units that were "making their numbers". Quite demoralizing seeing that hard work and good results don't translate into job security. But Sam will make his numbers. -Anonymous-
    • Comment 12/02/05: Dear IBM'ers, If you've recently received an offer to sever your relationship with IBM, don't call it a layoff, you were fired. Appeal everything, if you are going to leave the company, you will want to take every option available to you. Including the Internal Appeals process. If IBM is going to turn it's back on you, fight back and by all means, join the Alliance@IBM. I did! -Steve-
    • Comment 12/02/05: Canada is going through the same as Comment 12/01/05 Widespread staff layoffs were announced in the US yesterday. People are just being escorted to the door and told to get lost. Marketing and Operations, Canada is having a great year then this crap. Sure glad we are spending 5-7M making the HQ parking lot bigger and remodeling modules at HQ. What a fxxxxxg lost company. -Anonymous-
    • Comment 12/03/05: Dear IBM'ers, would a Canadian employee please send a copy of the severance package they are receiving from IBM. The Alliance would like to compare the US and Canadian severance packages. -Steve-
    • Comment 11/30/05: Band and Salary Re-assignments: Here's the next thing IBM is starting to do to existing employees. Yesterday, a co-worker notified me that they had just had call with their manager. The manager informed them, they had to find another job or be re-banded to a lower level and take a salary cut. Get ready everyone, this is the next move this company is taking to make the Executives look like heroes to the "head-in-the-sand" stockholders and "smell like three day old dead fish" to the IBM workers. Question: What is the Alliance for IBM workers and retirees going to do to help the employees from doing this? You've been organizing for several years now, collecting dues, saying a lot of good things.... but - we're not seeing any results at all. Isn't it about time - the Alliance does something. -Anonymous-
    • Comment 12/02/05: Sam's been watching too much Grinch or Scrooge, I'm surprised he isn't asking people if they want the whole day off on the 25th and to be back all the earlier the next day because Christmas is just a poor excuse to pick IBM's pocket every 25th of December. Oh well, nice to see he's making it up with more layoffs. We used to have a record store up here in Canada called Sam The Record man, but IBM has Sam The Family Wrecker man. -Anonymous-

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have too much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." — Franklin D. Roosevelt
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.