Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links
"News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues."
Web This Site

Quick Links:
  Get involved!
  Press articles
  Important Links
  Insider trading
  Lou's Contract
  Total Compensation
  Add or delete ID
  Change ID
  Contact site owner
Previous Highlights:
  April 21, 2007
  April 14, 2007
  April 7, 2007
  March 31, 2007
  March 24, 2007
  March 17, 2007
  March 10, 2007
  March 3, 2007
  February 24, 2007
  February 17, 2007
  February 10, 2007
  February 3, 2007
  January 27, 2007
  January 20, 2007
  January 13, 2007
  January 6, 2007
  December 30, 2006
  December 23, 2006
  December 16, 2006
  December 9, 2006
  December 2, 2006
  November 25, 2006
  November 18, 2006
  November 11, 2006
  November 4, 2006
  October 28, 2006
  October 21, 2006
  October 14, 2006
  October 7, 2006
  September 30, 2006
  September 23, 2006
  September 16, 2006
  September 9, 2006
  September 2, 2006
  August 26, 2006
  August 19, 2006
  August 12, 2006
  August 5, 2006
  July 29, 2006
  July 22, 2006
  July 15, 2006
  July 8, 2006
  July 1, 2006
  June 24, 2006
  June 17, 2006
  June 10, 2006
  June 3, 2006
  May 27, 2006
  May 20, 2006
  May 13, 2006
  May 6, 2006
  2006 Stock Meeting
  April 22, 2006
  April 15, 2006
  April 8, 2006
  April 1, 2006
  March 25, 2006
  March 18, 2006
  March 11, 2006
  March 4, 2006
  February 25, 2006
  February 18, 2006
  February 11, 2006
  February 4, 2006
  January 28, 2006
  January 21, 2006
  January 14, 2006
  January 7, 2006
  December 31, 2005
  December 24, 2005
  December 17, 2005
  December 10, 2005
  December 03, 2005
  November 26, 2005
  November 19, 2005
  November 12, 2005
  November 5, 2005
  October 29, 2005
  October 22, 2005
  October 15, 2005
  October 8, 2005
  October 1, 2005
  September 24, 2005
  September 17, 2005
  September 10, 2005
  September 3, 2005
  August 27, 2005
  August 20, 2005
  August 13, 2005
  August 6, 2005
  July 30, 2005
  July 23, 2005
  July 16, 2005
  July 9, 2005
  July 2, 2005
  June 25, 2005
  June 18, 2005
  June 11, 2005
  June 4, 2005
  May 28, 2005
  May 21, 2005
  May 14, 2005
  May 7, 2005
  April 30, 2005
  April 23, 2005
  April 16, 2005
  April 9, 2005
  April 2, 2005
  March 26, 2005
  March 19, 2005
  March 12, 2005
  March 5, 2005
  February 26, 2005
  February 19, 2005
  February 12, 2005
  February 5, 2005
  January 29, 2005
  January 22, 2005
  January 15, 2005
  January 8, 2005
  January 1, 2005
  December 25, 2004
  December 18, 2004
  December 11, 2004
  December 4, 2004
  November 27, 2004
  November 20, 2004
  November 13, 2004
  November 6, 2004
  October 30, 2004
  October 23, 2004
  October 16, 2004
  October 9, 2004
  October 2, 2004
  September 25, 2004
  September 18, 2004
  September 11, 2004
  September 4, 2004
  August 28, 2004
  August 21, 2004
  August 14, 2004
  August 7, 2004
  July 31, 2004
  July 24, 2004
  July 17, 2004
  July 10, 2004
  July 3, 2004
  June 26, 2004
  June 19, 2004
  June 5, 2004
  May 29, 2004
  May 22, 2004
  May 15, 2004
  May 8, 2004
  2004 Stock Meeting
  April 24, 2004
  April 10, 2004
  April 3, 2004
  March 27, 2004
  March 20, 2004
  March 13, 2004
  March 6, 2004
  February 28, 2004
  February 21, 2004
  February 14, 2004
  February 7, 2004
  February 1, 2004
  January 18, 2004
  December 27, 2003
  December 20, 2003
  December 13, 2003
  December 6, 2003
  November 29, 2003
  November 22, 2003
  November 15, 2003
  November 8, 2003
  November 1, 2003
  October 25, 2003
  October 18, 2003
  October 11, 2003
  October 4, 2003
  September 27, 2003
  September 20, 2003
  September 13, 2003
  September 6, 2003
  August 30, 2003
  August 23, 2003
  August 16, 2003
  August 9, 2003
  Pension Lawsuit Win
  July 26, 2003
  July 19, 2003
  July 12, 2003
  July 5, 2003
  June 28, 2003
  June 21, 2003
  June 14, 2003
  June 7, 2003
  May 31, 2003
  May 24, 2003
  May 17, 2003
  May 10, 2003
  2003 Stock Meeting
  April 26, 2003
  April 19, 2003
  April 12, 2003
  April 5, 2003
  March 29, 2003
  March 22, 2003
  March 15, 2003
  March 8, 2003
  March 1, 2003
  February 22, 2003
  February 15, 2003
  February 8, 2003
  February 1, 2003
  January 25, 2003
  January 18, 2003
  January 11, 2003
  January 4, 2003
  December 28, 2002
  December 21, 2002
  December 14, 2002
  December 7, 2002
  November 30, 2002
  November 23, 2002
  November 16, 2002
  November 9, 2002
  November 2, 2002
  October 26, 2002
  October 19, 2002
  October 12, 2002
  October 5, 2002
  September 28, 2002
  September 21, 2002
  September 14, 2002
  September 7, 2002
  August 31, 2002
  August 24, 2002
  August 17, 2002
  August 10, 2002
  August 3, 2002
  July 27, 2002
  July 20, 2002
  July 13, 2002
  July 6, 2002
  June 29, 2002
  June 22, 2002
  June 15, 2002
  June 8, 2002
  June 1, 2002
  May 25, 2002
  May 18, 2002
  May 11, 2002
  2002 Stock Meeting
  April 27, 2002
  April 20, 2002
  April 13, 2002
  April 6, 2002
  March 30, 2002
  March 23, 2002
  March 16, 2002
  March 9, 2002
  March 2, 2002
  February 23, 2002
  February 16, 2002
  February 9, 2002
  February 2, 2002
  January 26, 2002
  January 19, 2002
  January 12, 2002
  January 5, 2002
  December 29, 2001
  December 22, 2001
  December 15, 2001
  December 8, 2001
  December 1, 2001
  November 24, 2001
  November 17, 2001
  November 10, 2001
  November 3, 2001
  October 27, 2001
  October 20, 2001
  October 13, 2001
  October 6, 2001
  September 29, 2001
  September 22, 2001
  September 15, 2001
  September 8, 2001
  September 1, 2001
  August 25, 2001
  August 18, 2001
  August 11, 2001
  August 4, 2001
  July 28, 2001
  July 21, 2001
  July 14, 2001
  July 7, 2001
  June 30, 2001
  June 23, 2001
  June 16, 2001
  June 9, 2001
  June 2, 2001
  May 26, 2001
  May 19, 2001
  May 12, 2001
  May 5, 2001
  2001 Stock Meeting
  April 21, 2001
  April 14, 2001
  April 7, 2001
  March 31, 2001
  March 24, 2001
  March 17, 2001
  March 10, 2001
  March 3, 2001
  February 24, 2001
  February 17, 2001
  February 10, 2001
  February 3, 2001
  January 27, 2001
  January 20, 2001
  January 13, 2001
  January 6, 2001
  December 30, 2000
  December 23, 2000
  December 16, 2000
  December 9, 2000
  December 2, 2000
  November 24, 2000
  November 17, 2000
  November 10, 2000
  November 4, 2000
  October 28, 2000
  October 21, 2000
  October 14, 2000
  October 7, 2000
  September 30, 2000
  September 23, 2000
  September 16, 2000
  September 9, 2000
  September 2, 2000
  August 26, 2000
  August 19, 2000
  August 12, 2000
  July 29, 2000
  July 22, 2000
  July 15, 2000
  July 1, 2000
  June 24, 2000
  June 17, 2000
  June 10, 2000
  June 3, 2000
  May 27, 2000
  May 20, 2000
  May 13, 2000
  May 6, 2000
  April, 2000

Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits - Join the Alliance!

Retirees, Vendors, Contractors, Temps, and Active Employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance.

    Highlights—November 6 , 2004
  • From Janet Krueger. Full excerpt: I just talked to a national magazine reporter who is looking at doing a story on the disappointments of retirement. She would specifically like to talk to someone who retired, and then ended up going back to work, either full or part time, because they found they needed extra money to cover their basic expenses, such as the health care bills. It would be ideal if that person has adult children who have started thinking about their prospects for being able to retire someday, as she would like to do a cross-generational story about retirement challenges. You do NOT need an accounting background for this story, nor do you need to understand the progressive cuts IBM has implemented in their pension plan. If you would be willing to share your story with a reporter, or if you know someone else who might be willing, please send me a note at janet.krueger@prodigy.com... or give me a call at 507 289 9030.

  • MSN/Money: Welcome to the risk economy. The current economy has shifted risk to the individual. We shoulder more burden for our retirements, our paychecks and our insurance than previous generations. No wonder we’re anxious. Excerpt: Will I be better off than my parents? Will my children be better off than me? Those are extraordinary questions for those of us living in the United States to ask. At least since the Great Depression, and even further back if your family immigrated to this country in the last half of the 19th century, each generation has done better economically than the previous one. Economic progress from one generation to the next has been the foundation of our society. We’re asking those questions now because we’re all part of a big economic change that I call the “risk economy." That the questions are even being raised indicates just how anxious many of us feel about the future. Most efforts to analyze this anxiety have focused on the numbers -- specifically, will we be better off, on average, than the preceding generation? That misses the point, and can be too easily influenced by the researcher’s bias. Instead of averages, real people worry about worst-case scenarios while hoping for best-case scenarios. The average doesn’t keep us up at night. And that, I’m sure, explains our heightened economic anxiety. Because so much economic risk has shifted, and continues to shift, to individuals, many people fear the worst-case scenarios (serious illness, fraud, irreplaceable loss of income) are possible, if remote. A good part of the certainty that characterized our parents’ economic life has turned into a set of variable outcomes for this generation.

  • BenefitNews.com: Pension system future may turn on cash balance decisions. Excerpts: IBM case reverberates. Cash balance opponents assert that they do not oppose the plan design itself, but are instead concerned about the impact on long-service employees when there is a conversion from a defined benefit plan to a cash balance plan. Despite earnest attempts by most employers to provide increased disclosure and transition assistance for their employees, some long-tenured workers continue to cry foul over the loss of future benefits, and legislators have heard their cries. The most outspoken critics of cash balance plans continue to stoke the fire of debate by invoking claims of age discrimination, a charge based on the aberrant July 2003 decision by the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in the case of Cooper v. IBM. Despite case law and legislative history to the contrary, Chief U.S. District Judge G. Patrick Murphy ruled in this case that cash balance plans - and, by implication, numerous other pension plan designs - are inherently age discriminatory. Even the federal government's own employee retirement plans would flunk the court's standard. According to the court's flawed logic, a pension design is discriminatory even if the employer makes equal contributions to the plan on behalf of all its workers and, ironically, even in many instances where the design provides greater contributions for older workers.

    Representative John Boehner, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee (with jurisdiction over ERISA issues), has announced his intention to propose legislation in 2005 that will help clarify the legitimacy of cash balance plans. "Our ultimate goal is to ensure cash balance plans remain a viable option for employers who want to remain in the defined benefit system and workers who prefer the portable and secure benefit this option provides," Boehner said at a July 15, 2004, hearing on the topic. There will doubtless be resistance to such legislation. Critics will continue to cite the Cooper decision in support of their efforts to undermine these plans. By preventing the Treasury Department from regulating these plans rather than working constructively to help plan sponsors, anti-cash balance activists are harming millions more working Americans than they are helping. By attempting to discredit innovative pension plans with faulty claims of age discrimination, they are exposing all pension plans to unwarranted liability. And by misappropriating the appropriations process to further their own agenda, they are abusing the trust placed in them by their constituents. Cash balance plans can still be the bright, shining star in a dimming universe of the pension system - if we can get our leaders to see the light. - E.B.N.

  • Workforce Management: The Cash-Balance Battle Grinds On. "Massive plan termination" is possible unless Congress acts. Excerpts: Give round one to Kathi Cooper. She’s the IBM employee whose lawsuit over the computer giant’s conversion to a cash-balance plan helped transform the plans from one of the most popular kinds of corporate pensions into one of the most controversial, and contentious. In late September, IBM agreed to a partial settlement of the class-action suit, saying it would take a $320 million charge against third-quarter earnings to end all but two claims. IBM also agreed to a $1.4 billion cap for any additional liabilities it might be held responsible for, bringing to $1.7 billion the total liability the company could face in the matter. But the fight is not over. IBM is still contesting claims at the heart of Cooper’s 1999 suit that the formula it used to convert to a cash-balance plan discriminated against older workers in violation of federal pension laws. In July 2003, a U.S. District Court judge ruled in favor of Cooper and 140,000 IBM employees. IBM is appealing that ruling to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A verdict could be more than two years away. ...

    If an appeals court in the IBM case lets the lower court’s ruling stand, it could have a further chilling effect, says Ethan Kra, chief retirement actuary with Mercer Human Resource Consulting in New York. "It would be devastating, and would lead to massive plan termination," Kra says. That’s not true, says Cooper, 54, a 25-year IBM veteran who’s become an active pension reformer since filing her suit, traveling to Washington, D.C., to lobby for fair treatment for older workers and retirees. "They’ve said the entire pension scheme of America could be affected, that everyone will go bankrupt. That’s the phoniest spin they created." ... Even before IBM’s case is resolved, federal lawmakers are expected to pick up next year where they left off earlier this year in drafting new pension guidelines. "I would be shocked if we get through next year without legislation," Kra says.

  • BenefitNews.com: Next Congress could pass pension bill, experts say. Excerpt: With the prospects dim for Congress passing legislation this year to address the concerns of defined benefit plan sponsors, pension advocates are looking to the next two-year congressional cycle for a fix to their problems. "The 109th Congress has the potential to be know as the Pension Congress,'" forecasts Stuart Brahs, The Principal Financial Group's vice president of federal government relations. ... One issue that plan sponsors want clarified is the legality of cash balance plans. A cash balance plan combines aspects of traditional defined benefit plans, which pay fixed benefits for life, and defined contribution plans like 401(k) accounts. The hybrid plan delivers benefits more evenly to the workforce and is more portable than traditional DB plans. Critics say cash balance plans have discriminated against older workers, who would benefit more under traditional arrangements. Indeed, that was the finding of a lower court last year in a case against IBM Corp. (Cooper vs. IBM). The company agreed in September to settle most of the claims filed by its older workers who said the company's cash balance plan discriminated against employees based on age. The partial settlement gave pension advocates some legal relief because it allows IBM to resolve age discrimination charges in an appeals court and caps its potential liability at $1.4 billion. "We are gratified that IBM will continue its appeal to the Seventh Circuit," says Mark Ugoretz, president of ERISA Industry Committee, which represents large employers. "If the Cooper case were to be upheld, which we strongly believe it will not, it would jeopardize over a thousand pension plans and the benefits of millions of current and future plan participants."

  • New York Times: States Are Battling Against Wal-Mart Over Health Care. Excerpt: Now, Wal-Mart finds itself under attack for what critics see as its miserly approach to employee health care, which they say is forcing too many of its workers and their families into state insurance programs or making them rely on charity care by hospitals. ... A survey by Georgia officials found that more than 10,000 children of Wal-Mart employees were in the state's health program for children at an annual cost of nearly $10 million to taxpayers. A North Carolina hospital found that 31 percent of 1,900 patients who described themselves as Wal-Mart employees were on Medicaid, while an additional 16 percent had no insurance at all. ... Although Wal-Mart officials flatly deny it, some Wal-Mart employees say they are encouraged to turn to public health care assistance. When Wal-Mart hired Samantha Caizza, a single mother of three, as a cashier at its Chehalis, Wash., store last November, she says she was told by a personnel manager "to get ahold of the state" for coverage for her children.

  • BenefitNews.com: More states help residents buy drugs from abroad. Excerpts: Missouri and Washington recently introduced programs allowing state residents to buy medications from foreign countries. Missouri's program, I-SaveRx (http://www.i-saverx.net/), helps residents to save 20% to 50% on the price of medications by using pharmacies in Canada, England and Ireland. Washington's program involves a state Web site (http://www.rx.wa.gov/) that links to approved Canadian pharmacies. At least a dozen other states and local governments have done likewise in defiance of federal law. ... Americans paid an average of 81% more for patented, brand name drugs than buyers in seven foreign countries in 2003, a new report from Boston University researchers indicates. For example, Americans paid 118% more than Italians and 75% more than Canadians.

  • CNN/Money: IBM: Workplaces did not cause cancer. Big Blue says study it commissioned says some diseases warrant additional research. Excerpt: A study of 126,000 IBM employees commissioned by the world's largest computer company found that workplace conditions did not cause cancer or other fatal illnesses, but some diseases warranted further research, IBM said Wednesday. IBM commissioned the study in 2000. The company has faced dozens of lawsuits from former employees who alleged that IBM knowingly exposed them, or their unborn babies, to dangerous chemicals. Critics and activists expressed skepticism about results of the study, which was carried out by researchers from Harvard University and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. ... Sheila Davis, director of the clean computer campaign for the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, an advocacy group, said it would be premature to make conclusions about the study before greater details were published. Davis added that she was skeptical of IBM's findings, noting that some other studies that were not paid for by the computer maker came to other conclusions. "It's not a surprise that if IBM sponsors a study they would get the results they're looking for," Davis said.

  • New York Times: Bush Pledges a Broad Push Toward Market-Based Policies. Excerpts: Mr. Bush's allies say they are confident he can now advance his vision of an "ownership society" and extend his conservative, market-oriented proposals for health, economic and tax policy. In particular, they said he was ready and eager to tackle what many considered an extraordinarily difficult political task - transforming Social Security so that younger workers could divert part of the taxes they pay into it to private accounts. ... Mr. Bush's "ownership society" is built on the assumption that giving individuals more responsibility for their financial lives, combined with a greater reliance on the private market, can slow the growth of government, reduce the cost of social welfare programs and modernize programs created in the New Deal and Great Society. ... "This is not going to be easy," he said. "This is the underpinning of the New Deal. There's a lot of emotional attachment to it among Democrats. And then there's the practical difficulties as well." Among those practical difficulties are the costs of moving to such a system, which some analysts estimate could be as much as $2 trillion over 10 years. Mr. Bush is also expected to keep pushing the idea of health savings accounts as a way to create savvier consumers who shop around for the best deals in medical care. ... Mr. Bush has been vague about how he will approach rewriting the tax code. Tax reform is appealing in the abstract, but the actual details and tradeoffs can be politically dangerous. Almost all of the major ideas being debated - such as a flat tax - would involve shifting some of the tax burden from the wealthy to middle-income families. Many Republicans say the current system penalizes people who save or invest their money rather than spend it.

  • New York Times: After the Voting: What May Lie Ahead for Business in America. Excerpts: From Wall Street to Detroit, there were plenty of sighs of relief as it became clear that President Bush had won another term. As one auto executive said, "Bush has been a good president to work with." ... But the biggest smiles yesterday came from Wall Street executives, who were pleased with the tax cuts in the first Bush term and hope for more of the same from the second. ... With the Bush victory, the shares of pharmaceutical makers like Pfizer, Merck and Eli Lilly, and for-profit health maintenance organizations like United HealthCare, Aetna and Wellpoint rose sharply yesterday. "We're seeing a big collective sigh of relief from those companies," said Kenneth Thorpe, a health care economist at Emory University. But no matter who is in the White House, big policy challenges remain. Roughly 45 million people are uninsured in the United States, and an estimated 70 percent of them are employed. To increase coverage, the Bush administration supports creating tax credits and health savings accounts and associated health plans for small businesses. Those strategies are intended to reduce the cost of health insurance for small employers and individual workers. But those kinds of health plans typically require sizable out-of-pocket payments by individuals.

  • Workforce Management: What to Watch for in ’05. Excerpts: The new look of Washington, D.C., is likely to be more business-friendly than the past four years have been. ... Indeed, Tim Cullen, senior vice president of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin, says that employers themselves may soon tire of lackluster results in the efforts to control health costs. Cullen tells the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that if costs don’t slow down by the next presidential election, businesses might "throw in the towel" and support far more government involvement in the health-care system. Voters in California narrowly defeated Proposition 72, which would have forced medium and large employers to pay 80 percent of employees’ health insurance premiums or contribute to a state fund. Gretchen Young, vice president of government affairs for Aon Consulting, says that the initiative could have passed had the very popular California governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, not opposed it. And, adds Young, some employers wouldn’t be too upset if the initiative went through--particularly those that currently pay for employees’ health care. "Employers who have (provided) health care are saying, ‘I want a level playing field,’ " Young says. Some employers, Young says, also believe that if more employees are covered, it could reduce the costs of uncompensated care that are eventually paid for by all Californians.

  • Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: Health Care Industry: Expects To Benefit From Bush Re-Election. Excerpts: "Status quo is good news for drug makers" such as Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, which were "facing the potential of much tougher oversight in pricing under" a Kerry presidency, according to the AP/Times. The result of the election prompted shares of Pfizer stock to increase 75 cents, or 2.6%, to 29.45 on Wednesday. Shares of Johnson & Johnson stock rose $1.41, or 2.4%, to $59.45, and shares of Merck stock increased $1.07, or 4%, to $27.87. In addition, shares of Abbott Laboratories stock increased 3%. ... Shares of stock in large health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and hospitals also increased on Wednesday, in large part because some had concerns that Kerry would "reverse many of Bush's Medicare reforms that were viewed as being very favorable to health care providers and insurers," USA Today reports. According to the Journal, the re-election of Bush could provide a "potential windfall" for health insurers as he seeks to implement a proposal to move the industry to a more free-market system through tax credits and health savings accounts ... Meanwhile, stocks in companies that currently perform embryonic stem cell decreased "sharply" on Wednesday "in expectation that Bush-imposed funding limitations will continue," according to the Journal.

  • New York Times: Insurers and Drug Makers See Gain in Bush Victory. Excerpts: Insurance and pharmaceutical executives said Thursday that they were pleased and immensely relieved at the election results. President Bush's victory, they said, guarantees that the new Medicare prescription drug program will be carried out by officials who enthusiastically support it. By contrast, they said, if John Kerry had won the election, he would have tried to revise and repeal major parts of the law, and the appointment of a new team of federal health officials would have delayed efforts to carry out the complex measure. ... The election results were seen as a good omen for insurers, especially managed-care companies. Smith Barney, the stock brokerage unit of Citigroup, predicted higher earnings for Aetna, Humana and PacifiCare as a result of the presidential and Congressional elections. "Medicare is a profitable new growth driver," Smith Barney said Thursday in a research report written by Charles A. Boorady, a securities analyst. By increasing Medicare payments to private plans, it said, the new law will make all three companies "more profitable.'' "A managed-care organization can receive an average $10,000 per customer per year for each Medicare enrollee they sign on, and marginal profit of about $300 to $400 per member per year,'' Smith Barney said. "Senator Kerry had threatened to cut reimbursement, whereas President Bush is a strong supporter of Medicare privatization.''

    Mr. Kerry had denounced the new Medicare law, saying it did more to help drug and insurance companies than the elderly. On the campaign trail, he often said he believed that the government should directly negotiate with drug companies to secure lower prices for Medicare beneficiaries, a practice forbidden under the law. Mr. Bush and Republicans in Congress can ensure that the ban stays in force. Bradford J. Holmes, vice president of Forrester Research, a technology consulting company in Cambridge, Mass., said: "The new law will now go into effect unchanged, without the pressure of revisionist desires of the Democrats. A Kerry administration would have put the Medicare drug benefit under the microscope and would have pushed for importation of prescription drugs as a way to expose global price differentials.''

  • Yahoo! News: Bush Pledges to Make Changes to Tax Code. Excerpts: Contending Americans have embraced his conservative agenda, President Bush (news - web sites) pledged Thursday to aggressively pursue major changes in Social Security, the tax code and medical malpractice awards, working with Democrats if they are receptive and leaving them behind if they're not. "I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it," Bush said a day after a decisive victory that made him the first president in 68 years to win re-election and gain seats in both the House and Senate. "I'll reach out to everyone who shares our goals," said Bush, who 24 hours earlier had promised to try to win over those who voted for his Democratic opponent.

  • New York Times: Confident Bush Outlines Ambitious Plan for 2nd Term. Excerpts: As he did in 2000, Mr. Bush campaigned this year on his proposal to add voluntary personal investment accounts to Social Security, letting workers divert part of their payroll taxes into stocks and bonds for their retirement. But he has never answered the big questions that would accompany any effort to remake the system, starting with how, in an era of large budget deficits, he would continue to pay for full benefits for current retirees if payroll taxes from current workers are partially diverted to private accounts. Personal accounts could provide greater returns than those earned by the system currently. But they are unlikely, by themselves, to address Social Security's long-term financial problems, which will become acute over the next several decades as the baby boom generation begins reaching retirement age and life expectancies continue to rise. Mr. Bush has never said what steps he might support, along with the creation of personal accounts, to pay for the new system and fill the long-term financial hole projected by Social Security's trustees. Beyond higher returns through investment, the menu of options is not appealing to either political party: benefit cuts to reduce expenses or tax increases to increase the amount of revenue flowing into the system.

  • Nashville City Paper: Sweeping changes ahead. Excerpts: Steve Forbes, the president and chief executive of Forbes Inc. and editor-and-chief of Forbes magazine sees some major changes in Medicare, Social Security, Federal tax code and personal savings accounts with the re-election of President Bush and the increase in the Republican majority controlling Congress. ... Individuals should expect to be given a choice between Medicare or new health care savings accounts (HSA). In this program Americans can contribute money to their own account, thus providing more control over their health insurance. Initially a hybrid system would exist, consisting of both programs, as Medicare is phased out. He predicts President Bush will also propose legislation for retirement or personal savings accounts to replace Social Security. Forbes expects to see a “super savings account” program proposed, where savings and other needs can be combined. Returns on the account would be tax-free. A revamping of the tax code should be anticipated. Much like his own proposal, he sees this taking the form of a flat tax.

  • New York Times: United Seeks an Additional $2 Billion in Cost Cuts. Excerpts: United Airlines, trying to restructure after nearly two years in bankruptcy protection, told its unions last night that it wanted to terminate its four employee pension plans and seek additional wage and benefit cuts, as part of a plan to cut another $2 billion a year in costs. ... The move has huge implications for the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which insures pension benefits in the event of a default. If United terminates its plans, the pension insurance agency would have to assume most of the airline's unsecured debt to its present and future retirees, which it estimates at $8.3 billion. The government has calculated that it would be responsible for about $6.4 billion of that total, the largest burden from a single company in the agency's 30-year history, almost twice as large as Bethlehem Steel's unfunded liability. United employees would lose the remaining $1.9 billion.

  • http://www.beneplace.com/ibmer/: "As IBM continues to revolutionize excellence in the workplace, we recognize your role you play everyday. With that in mind, welcome to EXTRAS, your one stop destination for all voluntary benefits, discounts and services available to you as an active employee of IBM." (Editor's note: Links to companies offering employee discounts are offered on this site in these categories: financial products and services, insurance programs, automobile discount programs, personal shopping, travel services, and work/life services. Also provided are links to regional discounts available to IBMers through the network of IBM Clubs. Although this site is available to anyone on the public Internet, some of the links on the site point to locations on the IBM internal-only (W3) intranet.)

  • "ol_pops" posts information about the DHL Small Package Discount program for IBMers. Full excerpt: NOTE: This program is for personal package delivery only. IBM Employees must pay by check at Airborne distribution centers. Drop boxes and home pickup are not allowed. Employees must insure that the Account Number 191898287 is in the "Bill to" Account # field of the airbill, and the "3rd Party" box is checked. Employees must also place their full name in the "Billing Reference" field of the airbill. (DHL employees are not authorized to provide the Account Number for this program so IBM Employees must have this information with them.) Contact DHL at 1-800-247-2676 or 1-888-508-4IBM or go to the web to determine the location of your local DHL distribution center Take your package(s), and a valid IBM employee badge or an IBM retirement identification card to the DHL distribution center to show eligibility as an active full-time U.S. employee or U.S. IBM retiree.

    DHL will determine price based on the weight of the package (must be <99 lbs), the type of delivery service needed (i.e. next-day, 2nd day), and a U.S. destination address. Print your full name in the "Billing Reference" field on the Airbill. Make sure that the Account Number 191898287 is in the "Bill to" Account # field of the airbill, and the "3rd Party" box is checked. The DHL employee at the station will mark the "Paid in Advance" box (PIA) when they take the package. Marking the PIA box alone does not make it PIA. The "Check No." and "Amount" information must also be on the airbill. The DHL employee will mark the information in these fields. Pay for the shipment by PERSONAL CHECK. IBM does not allow DHL to bill employees! Keep a copy of the Airbill or Airbill number. Track your package(s) with the Airbill Number at DHL track, http://track.dhl-usa.com/TrackByNbr.asp or by contacting DHL at 1-800-247-2676 or 1-888-508-4IBM.

  • Telegraph Group Limited (United Kingdom): Pursuing the American Dream. Excerpts: Many Europeans moving to America assume it will be a cakewalk given the lack of language barriers but discovering how to operate can take a while. ... The next surprise is the cost of health care. No one in their right mind would move to America without medical insurance. Even with coverage, you may have to contribute up to 20 per cent of the cost and meet a minimum deductible. The NHS can only be regarded with fond nostalgia. Some 44 million uninsured Americans rely on health and good fortune, but if either vanishes, they may face financial ruin, a fact borne out by medical bills creating the second major cause of personal bankruptcy. ... A workaholic society based on Protestant work ethics in pursuit of the American Dream, Americans work longer hours than their counterparts in other industrialised countries. As an expatriate, don't expect to stroll in at 9am and sneak out at 5pm each day or have free weekends. ... Affluence has a dark side and the richest nation on earth boasts 34.6 million Americans below the poverty line with around 12 million reportedly living on the edge of starvation. Ironically, the US has the worst child poverty rate and life expectancy throughout the industrialised world. ... After working in America, many Europeans return home with innovative ideas, a stronger sense of "can do" and a sigh of relief at shorter working hours, free medical care and less stress. (Editor's note: This article is highly recommended if you are interested in how at least one expatriate living in America views American society).

  • Telegraph Group Limited (United Kingdom): Dollar hits all-time low despite jobs growth. Excerpts: The US dollar fell to an all-time low against the euro yesterday despite strong employment news, as traders panicked over the greenback's inability to mount a revival. The dollar fell to $1.2942 as the market worried about America's economic prospects and large trade and current account deficits. Some strategists believe it could fall to $1.40 within a month.

  • The Onion (humor): National Museum of the Middle Class Opens in Schaumburg, IL. Excerpts: One of the 15 permanent exhibits, titled "Working For 'The Weekend,'" examines the routines of middle-class wage-earners, who labored for roughly eight hours a day, five days a week. In return, they were afforded leisure time on Saturdays and Sundays. According to many anthropologists, these "weekends" were often spent taking "day trips,"eating at chain family restaurants, or watching "baseball" with the nuclear family. "Unlike members of the lower class, middle-class people earned enough money in five days to take two days off to 'hang out,'" said Benson Watercross, who took a private jet from his home in Aspen to visit the museum. "Their adequate wages provided a level of comfort and stability, and allowed them to enjoy diversions or purchase goods, thereby briefly escaping the mundanity." ... Many museum visitors found the worldview of the middle class—with its reliance on education, stable employment, and ample pensions—difficult to comprehend.
Coverage on H1-B and L1 Visa and Off-Shoring Issues
  • New York Times, courtesy of CNET News: An industry in India cheers Bush victory. Excerpts: India's outsourcing companies were jubilant Wednesday that the elections in the United States will return President Bush to office. "This is great news for the offshoring industry," said Nandan Nilekani, chief executive of Infosys Technologies, a software services company. The trend toward outsourcing will now become even more inexorable, Nilekani said. Offshore outsourcing, or the moving of work from the United States to low-cost centers like India, was an issue in the presidential election. The Democratic candidate, Sen. John Kerry, blamed Bush and outsourcing for the loss of thousands of American jobs. Bush, in contrast, was largely silent on the issue. But members of his team, among them N. Gregory Mankiw, the chief economic adviser, and Treasury Secretary John Snow, have both defended outsourcing as another form of free trade. Kerry referred to ''Benedict Arnold companies and CEOs" who sent jobs overseas. He promised that as president he would end tax deferrals for companies that send work abroad. The tone of some campaign comments criticizing outsourcing was noted with some concern in India. The Times of India, the country's leading newspaper, called outsourcing the "swear word" of the 2004 elections. Thousands of workers in India's technology centers like Bangalore and Hyderabad closely followed the campaign. India's outsourcing industry employs hundreds of thousands of workers.

    Bush's re-election will bring out the latent demand for outsourcing and lead to more offshoring announcements by companies, he said. "Some corporations have been cautious about signing or announcing deals in the last few months," he said, adding, "Now they will no longer hold back." Some executives said that offshoring would grow at even steeper rates with Bush's victory. "The elections are over and so is the rhetoric; it will be easier for American corporations to step out with their outsourcing plans," said Vivek Paul, the vice chairman of Wipro, who works in Mountain View, Calif. The company itself is based in Bangalore. ... Bush's victory also proved that Kerry's anti-outsourcing position did not resonate with voters, Griswold said. "The talk about Benedict Arnold CEOs and traitors of the country, that rhetoric is finally dead," he said.

  • The Economic Times (India): Nasscom happy with Bush victory. Excerpts: Nasscom on Thursday said the re-election of George W Bush as US President would boost outsourcing and hoped that contentious issues like visa cap and social security paid by Indian IT workers in America would be sorted out. "We are glad that President George Bush is back in office as we know his policies. After his re-election, we would see more announcements by companies on outsourcing," Nasscom president Kiran Karnik told newspersons. He said software exports to the US from India account for 68 per cent of our total software exports and have been growing at around 30 per cent a year. "We are confident that with George Bush getting re-elected, the growth momentum will continue," he said. "Because of the rhetoric against outsourcing, many companies were not willing to talk about their plans to move work to India. But now, we would see more announcements by companies on outsourcing that will spur their peers to look at the concrete benefit it brings," he said.

  • The Economic Times (India): What Bush's victory means for India. Excerpts: Bush staying in the White House for a second term will be good for Indian trade. Bush is a big advocate of free trade. Kerry, on the other hand, has been more outspoken about offshoring of jobs. He plans to end tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas and wants federal contract work to be performed by American workers "where possible”. ... Q: What would a Bush victory mean for Indian professionals? A: Pressler said the United States does not have enough young people to do the jobs that are outsourced to India. “The unemployment rate in the US is only 5 per cent, comprising people who don't want to work and 2-3 per cent are temporary workers. We need outsourcing as well as immigration,” he said in a recent speech in India. (Editor's note: Former U.S. Senator Larry Pressler [R-S.D.] serves on a variety of corporate boards, as well as advisory boards, of several U.S., British, and Indian companies. Senator Pressler travels to India several times a year to perform his board duties, give lectures, and attend to other business.) For Indian professionals planning to move to the US, it is better if Bush stays in the White House. Though there has been an outcry over the cap on H1-B visas, there are already quite a few Bills in the US Congress calling for relaxation of visa norms. With Bush in the White House and Republicans in control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, Indian H1-B seekers shouldn’t be worried. India's IT sector is the highest user of these visas globally, used to send its software professionals to the US for providing outsourced services onshore.

    Q: What would a Bush victory mean for India’s booming IT industry? A: Good. Part of the popular enthusiasm for Kerry in the run-up to the elections stemmed from his promise to stop outsourcing American jobs to India and other countries. In a recent survey carried out among 300 companies in the Silicon Valley, 46.7 per cent said that offshoring will increase if President George W Bush is re-elected. As opposed to this, only 14.2 per cent said that outsourcing will increase if Kerry gets elected. While President Bush has refrained from commenting on the subject, his advisers have defended offshoring. Indian technology companies have reported robust growth in earnings in the past few quarters as more and more multinational corporations shifted back office jobs to India in an effort to control costs.

  • Communications of the ACM: Globalization and the American IT Worker [PDF]. Exporting IT jobs and importing IT workers not only harms U.S. IT workers, it also harms U.S. firms and the broader economy, by Norman Matloff. Excerpts: There is no question that having the work done on-site is more productive than shipping it overseas. Offshoring often results in longer completion times and lost market opportunities due to delays. Numerous detailed accounts of such problems have been published. Good software development requires constant interaction among developers and managers being able to walk down the hall for spur-of-the moment face-to-face conversations. Another major problem with offshoring is that the Indian business model involves staffing projects with young, inexperienced programmers in order to minimize costs. This has obvious adverse effects on quality. Some Indian offshoring firms point to their high ratings under the Capabilities Maturity Model (CMM). But CMM merely assesses a project’s management techniques, not the quality of its personnel. As one official in the CMM project at Carnegie Mellon University noted, “You can be an [highest CMM-rated] organization that produces software that might be garbage.”

    Not to worry, says the ITAA, because the number of jobs will increase in non-IT categories (such as construction and finance). But the vast majority of these jobs will not be of the high-level variety (such as architects and financial market analysts that have begun to migrate offshore, too). Thus the U.S. would lose IT and other jobs requiring a more rigorous level of education in exchange for gaining jobs (such as carpenters and loan officers) requiring a less demanding education. You don’t have to be a rocket economist to see that such a trend would be disastrous for the U.S. Some proponents of offshoring argue that the cost savings incurred by U.S. businesses from offshoring will lead to increased IT investment by these same businesses, thus creating new jobs for U.S. IT workers. They also argue that the U.S. should concentrate on its forte—innovation—to create jobs. But in both cases, among the new jobs, the technological ones are likely to be offshored, too, or filled in the U.S. with H-1Bs. Americans would mainly have access only to the nontechnological jobs. The venture capitalists call this new business model “micromultinational,” with sales and marketing jobs in the U.S. but with R&D done offshore. Once again, this amounts to trading jobs that require more education for jobs that need less education.

Now on the Alliance@IBM Site:
  • Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin: 185 jobs cut at Endicott Interconnect, Huron. Excerpts: Endicott Interconnect has reduced its work force twice before in 2004. In April, a union official reported about 60 workers were fired because of performance issues. In May, Endicott Interconnect cut 84 workers as part of a restructuring it said would eventually strengthen the company. Bill Eno, 47, of Vestal, was one of the Endicott Interconnect workers told Friday he no longer had a job. The equipment service technician was at home on vacation when he got a call from his manager to come to the plant. He had spent 22 years working for IBM and then two years employed at Endicott Interconnect. "We were a world-class operation, and now all of a sudden we can't keep our head out of water," said Eno, who described the mood among workers at the plant Friday as "pretty dreary."

    Endicott Interconnect has lost a reported 429 workers through layoffs and firings since its inception. The number includes the 200 workers the company laid off two weeks after the company took over the former IBM Microelectronics operation in 2002. Those cutbacks, which had affected about 10 percent of the company's work force, occurred almost two weeks after Election Day in 2002. Managers told affected employees about the recent job losses just three days after Election Day this year.

In Politics—
Note: The views expressed in the news articles and editorials in this section are those of their authors. They may or may not reflect the views of the editors of www.ibmemployee.com.
  • Robert Vanderbei, Professor, Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University: Election 2004 Results. (Editor's note: Professor Vanderbei's map uses county-by-county election return data from USA Today together with county boundary data from the US Census' Tiger database. His map is interesting in that it shows that, contrary to what traditional "red and blue" electoral college maps infer, the United States' political makeup is very much "purple!" Highly recommended!)
  • New York Times commentary by Nicholas D. Kritof: Living Poor, Voting Rich.
  • New York Times commentary by Maureen Dowd: The Red Zone
  • New York Times commentary by Garry Wills: The Day the Enlightenment Went Out
  • The Guardian (United Kingdom): Onward Christian soldiers
  • BBC News (United Kingdom): US vote boosts interest in Canada. Canadian immigration officials said the number of US citizens visiting their website went up six-fold the day after the US election.
  • New York Times commentary by Bob Herbert: O.K., Folks: Back to Work
  • New York Times commentary by Bob Herbert: Voting Without the Facts


"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have too much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." — Franklin D. Roosevelt
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.