Welcome to IBM Employee News and Links
"News and links for IBM employees, retirees, ex-employees, and persons interested in pension, retirement, off-shoring and corporate governance issues."
Web This Site

Quick Links:
  Get involved!
  Press articles
  Important Links
  Insider trading
  Lou's Contract
  Total Compensation
  Add or delete ID
  Change ID
  Contact site owner
Previous Highlights:
  April 21, 2007
  April 14, 2007
  April 7, 2007
  March 31, 2007
  March 24, 2007
  March 17, 2007
  March 10, 2007
  March 3, 2007
  February 24, 2007
  February 17, 2007
  February 10, 2007
  February 3, 2007
  January 27, 2007
  January 20, 2007
  January 13, 2007
  January 6, 2007
  December 30, 2006
  December 23, 2006
  December 16, 2006
  December 9, 2006
  December 2, 2006
  November 25, 2006
  November 18, 2006
  November 11, 2006
  November 4, 2006
  October 28, 2006
  October 21, 2006
  October 14, 2006
  October 7, 2006
  September 30, 2006
  September 23, 2006
  September 16, 2006
  September 9, 2006
  September 2, 2006
  August 26, 2006
  August 19, 2006
  August 12, 2006
  August 5, 2006
  July 29, 2006
  July 22, 2006
  July 15, 2006
  July 8, 2006
  July 1, 2006
  June 24, 2006
  June 17, 2006
  June 10, 2006
  June 3, 2006
  May 27, 2006
  May 20, 2006
  May 13, 2006
  May 6, 2006
  2006 Stock Meeting
  April 22, 2006
  April 15, 2006
  April 8, 2006
  April 1, 2006
  March 25, 2006
  March 18, 2006
  March 11, 2006
  March 4, 2006
  February 25, 2006
  February 18, 2006
  February 11, 2006
  February 4, 2006
  January 28, 2006
  January 21, 2006
  January 14, 2006
  January 7, 2006
  December 31, 2005
  December 24, 2005
  December 17, 2005
  December 10, 2005
  December 03, 2005
  November 26, 2005
  November 19, 2005
  November 12, 2005
  November 5, 2005
  October 29, 2005
  October 22, 2005
  October 15, 2005
  October 8, 2005
  October 1, 2005
  September 24, 2005
  September 17, 2005
  September 10, 2005
  September 3, 2005
  August 27, 2005
  August 20, 2005
  August 13, 2005
  August 6, 2005
  July 30, 2005
  July 23, 2005
  July 16, 2005
  July 9, 2005
  July 2, 2005
  June 25, 2005
  June 18, 2005
  June 11, 2005
  June 4, 2005
  May 28, 2005
  May 21, 2005
  May 14, 2005
  May 7, 2005
  April 30, 2005
  April 23, 2005
  April 16, 2005
  April 9, 2005
  April 2, 2005
  March 26, 2005
  March 19, 2005
  March 12, 2005
  March 5, 2005
  February 26, 2005
  February 19, 2005
  February 12, 2005
  February 5, 2005
  January 29, 2005
  January 22, 2005
  January 15, 2005
  January 8, 2005
  January 1, 2005
  December 25, 2004
  December 18, 2004
  December 11, 2004
  December 4, 2004
  November 27, 2004
  November 20, 2004
  November 13, 2004
  November 6, 2004
  October 30, 2004
  October 23, 2004
  October 16, 2004
  October 9, 2004
  October 2, 2004
  September 25, 2004
  September 18, 2004
  September 11, 2004
  September 4, 2004
  August 28, 2004
  August 21, 2004
  August 14, 2004
  August 7, 2004
  July 31, 2004
  July 24, 2004
  July 17, 2004
  July 10, 2004
  July 3, 2004
  June 26, 2004
  June 19, 2004
  June 5, 2004
  May 29, 2004
  May 22, 2004
  May 15, 2004
  May 8, 2004
  2004 Stock Meeting
  April 24, 2004
  April 10, 2004
  April 3, 2004
  March 27, 2004
  March 20, 2004
  March 13, 2004
  March 6, 2004
  February 28, 2004
  February 21, 2004
  February 14, 2004
  February 7, 2004
  February 1, 2004
  January 18, 2004
  December 27, 2003
  December 20, 2003
  December 13, 2003
  December 6, 2003
  November 29, 2003
  November 22, 2003
  November 15, 2003
  November 8, 2003
  November 1, 2003
  October 25, 2003
  October 18, 2003
  October 11, 2003
  October 4, 2003
  September 27, 2003
  September 20, 2003
  September 13, 2003
  September 6, 2003
  August 30, 2003
  August 23, 2003
  August 16, 2003
  August 9, 2003
  Pension Lawsuit Win
  July 26, 2003
  July 19, 2003
  July 12, 2003
  July 5, 2003
  June 28, 2003
  June 21, 2003
  June 14, 2003
  June 7, 2003
  May 31, 2003
  May 24, 2003
  May 17, 2003
  May 10, 2003
  2003 Stock Meeting
  April 26, 2003
  April 19, 2003
  April 12, 2003
  April 5, 2003
  March 29, 2003
  March 22, 2003
  March 15, 2003
  March 8, 2003
  March 1, 2003
  February 22, 2003
  February 15, 2003
  February 8, 2003
  February 1, 2003
  January 25, 2003
  January 18, 2003
  January 11, 2003
  January 4, 2003
  December 28, 2002
  December 21, 2002
  December 14, 2002
  December 7, 2002
  November 30, 2002
  November 23, 2002
  November 16, 2002
  November 9, 2002
  November 2, 2002
  October 26, 2002
  October 19, 2002
  October 12, 2002
  October 5, 2002
  September 28, 2002
  September 21, 2002
  September 14, 2002
  September 7, 2002
  August 31, 2002
  August 24, 2002
  August 17, 2002
  August 10, 2002
  August 3, 2002
  July 27, 2002
  July 20, 2002
  July 13, 2002
  July 6, 2002
  June 29, 2002
  June 22, 2002
  June 15, 2002
  June 8, 2002
  June 1, 2002
  May 25, 2002
  May 18, 2002
  May 11, 2002
  2002 Stock Meeting
  April 27, 2002
  April 20, 2002
  April 13, 2002
  April 6, 2002
  March 30, 2002
  March 23, 2002
  March 16, 2002
  March 9, 2002
  March 2, 2002
  February 23, 2002
  February 16, 2002
  February 9, 2002
  February 2, 2002
  January 26, 2002
  January 19, 2002
  January 12, 2002
  January 5, 2002
  December 29, 2001
  December 22, 2001
  December 15, 2001
  December 8, 2001
  December 1, 2001
  November 24, 2001
  November 17, 2001
  November 10, 2001
  November 3, 2001
  October 27, 2001
  October 20, 2001
  October 13, 2001
  October 6, 2001
  September 29, 2001
  September 22, 2001
  September 15, 2001
  September 8, 2001
  September 1, 2001
  August 25, 2001
  August 18, 2001
  August 11, 2001
  August 4, 2001
  July 28, 2001
  July 21, 2001
  July 14, 2001
  July 7, 2001
  June 30, 2001
  June 23, 2001
  June 16, 2001
  June 9, 2001
  June 2, 2001
  May 26, 2001
  May 19, 2001
  May 12, 2001
  May 5, 2001
  2001 Stock Meeting
  April 21, 2001
  April 14, 2001
  April 7, 2001
  March 31, 2001
  March 24, 2001
  March 17, 2001
  March 10, 2001
  March 3, 2001
  February 24, 2001
  February 17, 2001
  February 10, 2001
  February 3, 2001
  January 27, 2001
  January 20, 2001
  January 13, 2001
  January 6, 2001
  December 30, 2000
  December 23, 2000
  December 16, 2000
  December 9, 2000
  December 2, 2000
  November 24, 2000
  November 17, 2000
  November 10, 2000
  November 4, 2000
  October 28, 2000
  October 21, 2000
  October 14, 2000
  October 7, 2000
  September 30, 2000
  September 23, 2000
  September 16, 2000
  September 9, 2000
  September 2, 2000
  August 26, 2000
  August 19, 2000
  August 12, 2000
  July 29, 2000
  July 22, 2000
  July 15, 2000
  July 1, 2000
  June 24, 2000
  June 17, 2000
  June 10, 2000
  June 3, 2000
  May 27, 2000
  May 20, 2000
  May 13, 2000
  May 6, 2000
  April, 2000

Join your fellow employees who are fighting for your benefits - Join the Alliance!

Retirees, Vendors, Contractors, Temps, and Active Employees are all eligible to become members of the Alliance.

    Highlights for week ending May 17, 2003
  • Janet Krueger reports: The latest 10Q IBM has filed with the SEC (http://biz.yahoo.com/e/l/i/ibm.html) has a telling statement about workforce reductions: Workforce reductions, which are the ongoing reductions and rebalancing that occur each quarter were $79 million in first quarter of 2003 versus $138 million in first quarter of 2002. They admit workforce reductions are part of the plan! The reductions occur EACH QUARTER! The reductions are ONGOING! We knew this, of course, but there it is in black and white.
    • "rosiethemba" comments. Excerpt: Yes, the plan averages everyone to be 7 year temps. Pretty ingenious, albeit sick. An exec shared the 10% churn plan last year. Steve Mills, head of SWG, came to RTP and said layoffs were to be monthly. Steve Mills said IBM "Planned to turn over the workforce 10% each year, (pause)...Forever." Then Steve said, "It is still possible to actually have a "nice long term career with IBM, and then retire from them."...funny thing is, his tone of voice, shifting feet, and body weight jostling suggested he "Just told a joke with a punch line"..." laugh if you like." Steve's face gave permission to giggle "if one finds dark humor funny." No one did.

  • Reuters: Democrat Says Pension Plan to Help Banks. Excerpts: But the bill, sponsored by Ohio Republican Rep. John Boehner, would also allow companies to offer workers investment advice from firms that may have conflicts of interest, as long as the conflicts are disclosed and the firms agree to act in a worker's interest. In other words, the advice could come from the same company that provides mutual funds for the 401(k) plan, so long as this fact is disclosed to employees. ... Recalling a recent $1.4 billion Wall Street settlement over other conflicts of interest involving analysts at investment banks, Rep. George Miller said now was not the time to allow "conflicted" investment advice. "The main purpose of the Republican bill is to increase the market for investment companies wanting to manage and advise 401 (k) plans, something that is prohibited under law today," a statement from Miller's office said.

  • Democrats Joint Economic Committee: Why the Pension Preservation and Savings Expansion Act of 2003 Fails to Live Up to its Name [PDF--7 pages]. Excerpt: The Pension Preservation and Savings Expansion Act of 2003 makes a number of costly changes to the current employer-sponsored pension system and individual retirement saving arrangements that would provide significant benefits to those who least need help in preparing for retirement, while doing little to meet the retirement income security needs of most workers and retirees. In particular, the bill would accelerate to 2003 and make permanent scheduled increases in 401(k) and IRA contribution limits, raise the income limits for tax deductible and Roth IRA contributions, and raise the age at which workers must begin withdrawing assets from retirement accounts. The bill would also change funding rules for defined benefit pension plans, allowing sponsors to contribute less money to plans that are in many cases already dangerously underfunded.

  • New York Times: House Approves Pension Rule Changes. Excerpt: The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday approved changes in pension laws that sponsors said would provide workers advice on investing their retirement assets, and give them more control over them. Critics poured scorn on the bill, saying it was a sop to Wall Street firms penalized recently for conflicts of interest involving stock analysts because it would allow similar conflicts in the management of retirement funds. ... The House rejected a Democrat-sponsored amendment aimed at preventing abuses of executive compensation and protecting older workers when companies convert traditional pension plans to "cash balance" plans, which cut costs for employers.
    • The defeated Democrat-sponsored amendment was summarized as follows on the Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives Web site: An amendment in the nature of a substitute that requires executive pensions to be subject to the same pension rules that apply to other workers. Changes provisions that allow special executive pension plans to escape taxation, to receive special protection against creditors, and to end-run pension laws that require wide employee participation at the company. Requires that executive plans be subject to the same uniform and fair vesting and contribution limits that apply to rank-and-file employees. Requires companies changing from traditional pension plans to cash balance plans to allow older workers the choice of remaining in the old plan or joining the new plan. Requires executive compensation packages including pensions to be approved by the board of directors. Gives employees greater protections when a company declares bankruptcy, and denies executives preferential protection against creditors. Imposes an excise tax on executive golden parachutes.

  • Statement from U.S. Representative Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont): The Republican pension bill is a complete disaster. If you think what happened to the pensions of workers at Enron and WorldCom was a good thing, that it was good to destroy the retirement savings of tens of thousands of workers while those at the very top made out like bandits, you will love this bill. But, if you believe as I do, that more workers in this country need a strong pension plan, instead of fewer workers; and if you believe that those who do have good pension plans should not be robbed through cash balance pension schemes, you will support the George Miller-Charlie Rangel Amendment. ... The White House policy on cash balance pension plans is a direct assault on the retirement plans of millions of American workers. Hundreds of companies all across America have already reneged on the retirement promises they made to their employees by switching to cash balance pension plans. If the White House proposal is aloud to stand, it will give the green light to hundreds more -- resulting in financial disaster for workers all across the country who will not be receiving the pensions they were promised.

  • Bernie Sanders statement and questions for the Secretary of the Treasury. Excerpts: Since you became Treasury Secretary, how many meetings have you had with labor groups and senior citizen groups to get their views on the proposed Treasury regulations on cash balance pension plans? Would you be willing to meet with me and a group of labor unions and senior citizen advocates on this issue at a mutually convenient time and location? Do you think it is fair for workers to have their pensions slashed by as much as 50% under a cash balance pension conversion? Will you withdraw the proposed regulations on cash balance plans and issue new ones that won’t harm older workers as 217 Members of the House and Senate have urged you and the President to do? Will you support legislation to require employers that convert to cash balance plans to give workers the choice to remain in the traditional defined benefit pension plan that was promised to them when they first started working for their companies, just like you did when you were the CEO of CSX?

  • Wall Street Journal: Companies Cope With Pension Woes,But Some May Drop Plans. Excerpts: A number of U.S. companies may drop their defined-benefit pensions because plan liabilities are getting so large, according to a new study. Nonetheless, many companies are either coping with the impact on cash flow of big pension contributions, or don't think it's a problem.

  • Wall Street Journal: 2002 Was Worst Year Ever For Corporate Pensions -Study. Excerpts: Last year was the worst ever for corporate defined-benefit pensions, according to a study that reports on dramatic shifts in the retirement plans. A group of 320 companies in the S&P 500 lost $106 billion in pension assets, and responded by quadrupling their plan contributions to $41 billion from the $12 billion they contributed in 2001. Overall, the 320 companies saw a $34 billion pension surplus dissolve into a $177 billion deficit, according to the study. As a result, they are rethinking their longtime investment strategies.

  • Wall Street Journal: More Companies Seek IRS Waiver To Defer Pension Payments. Excerpt: More companies are asking the Internal Revenue Service for relief in coping with their eroded retirement plans. A growing number are telling the IRS that making required contributions to their pension plans would represent a business hardship. Companies are requesting that the agency let them delay contributions to their defined-benefit plans, which have lost big sums at a time when they must put away more to cover future benefits. They want the IRS to grant them waivers that give them the right to put off contributions for a year, and then stretch them out over the next several years. The waivers essentially relax a section of tax code governing pension funding standards.

  • Wall Street Journal: Bush Quietly Abandons Retirement-Savings Plan. Excerpt: President Bush is poised to win sweeping changes in the U.S. tax system, but not the top-to-bottom rewrite of retirement-savings incentives the White House was seeking. The president's proposal called for switching Americans from the dizzying array of tax-advantaged plans to a simplified system consisting of two basic vehicles: lifetime savings accounts and retirement savings accounts. But the plan was quietly abandoned soon after its splashy release with the federal budget.

  • Computerworld: Offshore coding work raises security concerns. Excerpt: A recent study by Gartner Inc. predicts that by 2004, more than 80% of U.S. companies will consider outsourcing critical IT services, including software development, to countries such as India, Pakistan, Russia and China. But some users said the trend needs to be given a sanity check in light of recent changes in the global security environment. At last week's Techno-Security Conference here, users peppered a panel of corporate security officers with questions about the wisdom of outsourcing software development to cheap labor overseas, where there is little or no way to ascertain the security risk that workers may pose.

  • Computerworld: Harvard event showcases Russia as outsourcing site. Excerpts: Lower wages than in the U.S. and an abundance of highly skilled computer programmers make Russia a good fit for companies aiming to bolster research and development or lower development costs, according to representatives from major Russian IT outsourcing firms. ... Luxoft, based in Moscow, runs offshore development centers in Russia for a number of major U.S. corporations including IBM, Dell Computer Corp. and The Boeing Co.

  • Computerworld: IT workforce demand lowest in four years. Excerpt: IT workers looking for jobs in the U.S. have nothing to cheer about in the latest workforce survey released by the Information Technology Association of America (download PDF). Hiring projections for IT workers during the next year are the lowest since 2000, and more than a tenth of IT companies are looking at moving IT jobs to countries with cheaper labor. ... Asked about moving IT jobs outside of the U.S., 6% of all firms said they already have, including 22% of IT companies with 1,000 or more employees. Fifteen percent of IT firms say they will or might move IT jobs out of the U.S. in the next year. The jobs most likely to be moved from the U.S. are programming/software engineering, followed by network design and Web development, according to the ITAA survey.

  • Rediff.com (India): IBM to expand operations in Karnataka. Excerpts: IBM Inc, the $81-billion world's largest IT firm, will be expanding its operations in Karnataka, including a Linux development centre at Hubli and ramping up its existing facilities in Bangalore, where the headquarters of its Indian subsidiary is located. IBM's expansion plans in the state emerged out of a meeting between IBM chairman Samuel J Palmisano and Karnataka Chief Minister S M Krishna and senior government officials in Bangalore on Monday. Though Palmisano declined to interact with the waiting newspersons, Krishna told the media after the 30-minute meeting that IBM India had decided to expand its Bangalore facility in the areas of software development, global services and research and development. ... Describing the significance of Palmisano's first visit to the sub-continent, McNesse said IBM India was increasingly becoming important to the Big Blue's global operations as a development centre with software and research labs, call centre and services. "India is emerging as a huge market for IBM's operations. We value the domain expertise its talented engineers command. To be in India is a win-win situation for us," McNesse claimed.

  • Rdiff.com (India): Big Blue blueprint seems to bet big on India. Excerpt: IBM, the world's largest infotech company, seems to be betting big on India. The past few weeks have seen its top three global executives -- chairman Samuel J Palmisano, president Steven Mills and head of technology and manufacturing Nicholas M Donofrio -- on business visits to India. And now, it's the turn of Paul Horn, head of IBM research, the hallowed research unit, to be here soon. IBM executives in India are tight-lipped about the reasons behind these visits. But the buzz is that IBM is moving strategic operations in the software business area, and looking at expanding its hardware and services operations in India. An industry source said India offers a great destination for a company like IBM to shift its significant software development and services work. Besides, with the consolidation of Indian IT-enabled market, the company can look at moving substantial part of its BPO operations also to India. "The visits of the senior executives of the company is likely to be a prelude to major investment plans by the company," the source added.

  • Economic Times (India): IBM to merge Indian arms, to hire more staff. Excerpt: IT major IBM is merging its two Indian arms — IBM Global Services India (IGSI) and IBM India. The merged entity will be called IGSI. According to sources, as a result of the merger, the entire business of IMB India would be transferred to IGSI and in consideration of the same IGSI would issue shares to the shareholders of IBM India.

  • Read the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers' (WashTech) Web page about offshoring of high tech jobs.

  • New York Times: New Study Finds 60 Million Uninsured During a Year. Excerpt: The report said 57 million to 59 million people, "about a quarter of the nonelderly population," lacked insurance at some time in 1998, the most recent year for which reliable comparative figures were available. At the same time, the budget office said, government surveys suggest that the number of people uninsured for the entire year was 21 million to 31 million, or 9 percent to 13 percent of nonelderly Americans.

  • Washington Post: Kucinich's 'Medicare for All' Offers No Role for Private Insurers.

  • Wall Street Journal: A Retired Steelworker Struggles With a Health-Insurance Crisis. How the Ailing Industry Broke Promises From the Past to Remain Afloat Today. Excerpt: Now 57 years old and in fragile health, Mr. Kurilko faces an excruciating decision. Should he use up his savings to pay the monthly $2,864 fee for health insurance himself? Should he buy a plan that is cheaper but provides less coverage? Or should he go without coverage and hope that his weakened heart doesn't give out?

  • Washington Post: Dean Offers Plan for Near-Universal Health Care Access. Excerpt: Former Vermont governor Howard Dean today unveiled a plan to provide near-universal access to health care coverage by targeting federal assistance to those without insurance and penalizing large, profitable corporations that fail to offer it, saying the United States "has fallen 50 years behind the social standards of what we consider the civilized world." Dean, a medical doctor who has made expanding health care coverage one of the pillars of his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, said the proposal would provide as much or more coverage at less than half the cost of the plan proposed by rival Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.).

  • Washington Post: Feeling Uninsured About Future. Forum in Fairfax Examines Looming 'Health Care Crisis' Excerpt: "We don't know what it will take for people to comprehend the magnitude of the health care crisis," said Christina Stevens, director of Fairfax's Community Health Care Network, which oversees the county's clinics. "It's almost like the whole system will implode." To bring light to the issue, Stevens helped organize a panel of medical professionals, health policymakers and government officials to discuss the future of health care locally and nationally. About 200 people gathered at the Fairfax County Government Center this week as speakers outlined the situation and the cost to society. Because the uninsured cannot easily pay for doctor visits and other treatment, many put it off, said Jane H. Woods, Virginia's secretary of health and human resources and a panelist at Monday night's forum. If their conditions worsen, they usually end up at the hospital with more serious problems. This, in turn, has helped stretch the average wait in local emergency rooms to five hours, said Patricia Schmehl, senior director of women's and emergency services at Inova Fairfax Hospital.

  • San Jose Mercury News: Kerry Touts $80 Billion Health Care Plan. Excerpt: "A quarter of the money America spends on health care goes to non-medical costs - basically the time spent paying bills and handling paperwork," Kerry said. "No other industry is so inefficient." Kerry pointed out that while banks have reduced the costs of individual transactions to as little as a penny per transaction, "a single transaction in health care can cost as much as $12 to $25 - and not a penny of that goes to care," he said.

  • Philadelphia Inquirer editorial, courtesy of the Billings Gazette: Democracy is dead at most corporate annual meetings. Excerpts: Indeed, during the 100-minute meeting, there appeared to be only one decision that was not a foregone conclusion. When a shareholder complained that the directions to the meeting at the First Union Center did not consider the needs of subway riders, Roberts made a quick executive decision. "We will make that correction in the future," he declared. There was nothing unusual in the Comcast meeting -- at almost all annual meetings management gets everything it wants. ... Publicly held corporations are supposed to be democracies. They are owned by the shareholders, who elect directors to hire and fire managers. The annual meeting has all the trappings of democracy -- reports to shareholders, discussion, voting. But the democracy is just an illusion. Typically, the director candidates run unchallenged, since only the directors have the power to decide who gets on the ballot.

  • The Segal Group: Tough Executive Pay Choices for 2003 [PDF]. Excerpts: Clearly, 2003 is shaping up as another year of tough executive compensation choices for management teams and boards. Three years of down markets have done nothing to improve company overhang issues or employee motivation. The realization of a future expense for stock options further complicates the situation.

  • Associated Press: Executive Pensions Mysterious to Many. Excerpts: We know the salaries of the top executives. We know how much their annual bonuses are. We know how many stock options they have. But we don't know everything that goes into their compensation. Not even close. We don't know all about their pensions. They're huge and getting bigger all the time. "Executives are using preferential retirement plans to gain surreptitious pay," said Brandon Reuse, a research analyst for the AFL-CIO, which is lobbying for compensation reform. ... But executives often complain that federally imposed caps curb the amount of their annual pensions at $160,000. Given their hefty paychecks, they think they should get more. That's led many companies to set up special retirement programs just to service top officers, which some critics say is yet another back-door way to line executives' pockets.

  • Business Week: Executive Pay: Labor Strikes Back. Recent union-led proxy victories could curb corner-office excesses. Excerpts: Delta Air Lines pilot Michael H. Messmore was incensed at the $28 million golden parachute handed to former Delta Chief Executive Ronald W. Allen when he resigned in 1997. To stop such excesses, Messmore, with the backing of the Air Line Pilots Assn., submitted a proxy resolution in 2000 demanding shareholder approval of such deals. The initiative was rejected three years in a row. But at Delta's annual meeting on Apr. 25, widespread shareholder anger over revelations of bankruptcy-proof retirement packages for current executives put Messmore's resolution over the top, with a 54% majority. Another pilot-sponsored proposal calling for the cost of stock options to be deducted from earnings racked up a 60% majority. "Executive compensation is out of whack," says Messmore.

This week on the Alliance@IBM Site:

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have too much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." — Franklin D. Roosevelt
This site is designed to allow IBM Employees to communicate and share methods of protecting their rights through the establishment of an IBM Employees Labor Union. Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act states it is a violation for Employers to spy on union gatherings, or pretend to spy. For the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act, notice is given that this site and all of its content, messages, communications, or other content is considered to be a union gathering.